Download file to see previous pages...
the society as opposed to altering the vital document (Taylor 1).The influential court has not only made it hard to fine-tune the constitution, but also to row against the essentials of the constitution.
The makers of the constitution have been said to have placed the bar extremely high for a likelihood of any type of regulation in the constitution. Black argues that the constitution gave the president the authority of being the commandant of the forces, but ordinarily the president does very little in the event that decisions touching on warfare and peace are concerned (1). This means that the constitution has very little to recommend in regard to nuclear assails. In this case, the main challenge is that the framers of the initial constitution had very little information on the important issues in the country as well as the role of politics in shaping the structure of the constitution (Black 1). Unless this transforms, it might be too time-consuming to adjust the present constitution.
The Senate and the House are require to pass a majority of 2/3 votes if the constitution has to be amended (Black 1). This case has been alien to the country for the earlier periods. Article V of the constitution, as the author terms it, - an “iron cage”- has made it extremely tasking to amend the constitution (Black 1). The Anti-flag-burning amendment is good case in point that failed. The amendment only had 66 votes in favour, and 34 votes opposing the same (Martin 1). This means that the amendment failed to gather the necessary 2/3 votes that would have otherwise led to the Bush government leading the congress towards holding the power of banning contravention of the treasured American flag.
Despite the fact one would argue that passing the amendment would be critical both for the current generation and the future, in terms of political and constitution importance, the same was hampered by the culture of the country in relation to constitution amendments. The narrow defeat
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
citizen certain fundamental liberties and rights. With regard to criminal procedures, the foremost of these rights is the assumption of innocence. Though not explicitly written into the Constitution, this presumption has been interpreted by several court rulings as implied in the Eighth and Fifth Amendments.
To what extent does the evidence suggest that these propositions are valid And, in your scholarly opinion which of the two has more weight
The British Constitution is uncodified and can be found in a variety of documents. Advocates of this form of constitution believe that the uncodified system encourages flexibility and changes can be made easily.
However, this is not the case in the United Kingdom. Constitutions differ as regards their detailed features, though most are nowadays written. The principle characteristics of the British Constitution, which distinguish it from nearly all others, include features, such as it being unwritten and flexible.
While the framers left the door open to amendments and the inevitable need for change, they did it in a fashion that requires deliberation and careful thought. The words of the Constitution rest firmly on a foundation of principles and values. These principles were an extension of right and wrong and the inalienable rights that had been the underpinning of European documents and philosophies that had preceded it.
The European constitution is threatening to overtake British constitution, considered to be the mother of all the constitutions and there are apprehensions in the air.
In his recent speech as party leader at Labour Conference, Prime Minister Gordon Brown Declared: "Britain has been tested and not found wanting.
It suggests that the American Constitution is a manufacture rather than a growth. (Dicey, 1915 24)
In fact, each of these political organisms is the product of progressive history. It is true that the Convention of 1787 sent out a single document for adoption, while the written parts of Britain's fundamental law are embodied in several documents, which took form at different periods.
Since he needed to continuously defend the kingdom and all places where he exercised jurisdictions, the King has practically all powers, which he could use to protect the public good. These residual powers are technically embodied in the term “Royal
The process of amending this constitution is fair because when amendments are proposed, the citizens must approve all the changes. The proposed amendments including the limit of local government tax levy