I will tell you later - Essay Example

ROBINSON AND SEN ON THE ASPECT OF GLOBALIZATION How do both argue that we should judge globalization, and why are their opinions different?Robinson argues that Globalization is the dissemination of capitalism throughout the entire world. Prior to globalization, there was a lot of conflict about the issue of power. America continued the colonialism by politicizing the issue as well using military to rule in Latin America, Latin America, the Middle East and any other place in the entire world. After the Second World War, colonialists empowered America with the obligation of ensuring stability, and they choose authoritarian governments whether intentionally or not1.

However, the authoritarian governments faced many pressures from Egypt and Iran by elites with the intention of securing greater sovereignty and self-control. America demanded for a response after endorsing presence of authoritarian governments with the purpose of assuring stability. However, there was change in the 1970’s and 1980’s as famous movements that were demanding change became very frequent2. As these movements acquire much momentum, the United States was unable to ascertain political and economical stability, which was very necessary by then.

In addition, in 1980, the foreign policy used by the US was amended to a democracy promotion. The global economy continued gaining more relevance, and it was during this moment that a new elite sprout on Capitalist strength3. This was in 1980 prior to the finish of Cold war. This was very significant because America it illustrates that America majored in globalization of political and economic features prior to the end of the bi-polar hegemonic system. On the other hand, Sen argues that Globalization does not entirely reflect westernization.

According to Sen, globalization is neither new, nor westernized; however, the benefits are justifiable4. Therefore, these two authors points out that we should look at the perspectives of globalization in the sense that, it is something that has been existing and it is not about transformation5. 2) Looking back over the readings and activities of the last three weeks, what do you think the strongest arguments are in favor of viewing globalization as a positive force in history? Based on the readings, Globalization involves sharing goods and services or rather continuity of goods, concepts and authority among many nations, which leads to dependence and interconnection.

In this case, globalization becomes a positive factor for change. This is because of improved technology; also, the entire world in under control and it is also empowered through global transactions. 3) In contrast, what do you think the strongest arguments are in favor of and viewing globalization as a negative force in history? I tend to believe that globalization becomes a negative aspect because, firstly, the diffusion of both the traditions and cultures. These factors are fading day in day out.

However, this is a temporal way because eventually the cultures and the traditions will ultimately interact. Another negation about globalization is the fact that most organizations outsource their services. The country ends lacking employment opportunities ReferenceAlkire, Sabina. Valuing Freedoms. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 104- 124. Amartya Sen, “How to Judge Globalism,” The American Prospect (January 2002) and Globalization DebatesBarry Bosworth and Philip Gordon, “Managing a Globalizing World,” Brookings Review (Fall 2001.

Hutchings, Kimberly, “Towards a Feminist International Ethics,” in Booth, Ken. Howm Might We Live: Global Ethics in a New Century. Cambridge, University Press, 2001. Jan Nederveen Pieterse, "Globalization and Culture: Three Paradigms," Chapter 3 in his Globalization and Culture: Global Melange (Rowman and Littlefield, 2004).London AJ. Justice and the human development approach to international research. Hastings Center Report. 2005; 35: 24-37Resnik D. Distribution of biomedical research resources and international justice.

Developing World Bioethics 2004; 4 (1): 42-57 Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom, (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1999Singer, Peter. “Famine, Affluence and Morality,” International Ethics, Princeton University Press, 1985. Uvin, Peter. Human Rights and Development. Kumarian Press, 2004, pp, 167-201