S5W10DQs Responses - Assignment Example

Rebuilding the Afghanistan nation Rebuilding the Afghanistan nation The economic importance of the de facto partition on AfghanistanThe de facto partition on Afghanistan was a counterterrorism insurgency plan forged in 2009 under president Obama’s administration that sought to facilitate economic empowerment for Afghanistan while waging war on the Afghan-Pakistan border (Rogriguez, 2011). In essence, the partition will serve as a critical milestone for the recently liberated nation as the strategy will help the country’s farmers to focus on agriculture as the first step in to achieving economic liberation.

This is because the US intended to bring life to the country rather than leave the country’s population to continue suffering (Dorronsoro, 2011). Ideally, political unrest in the nation had made the nation intolerable to the population hence giving no room for economic practices. However, this changed with the war on security insurgency in Afghanistan that made Islamist militia flee southwards where they have found safe zones. In this regard, the de facto plan was timely as it enabled the US to control the re-emergence of extremist movement that had halted the growth of this Islamic nation (Rogriguez, 2011).

Therefore, concerted efforts on the Taliban and the remaining Al-Qaeda extremists was timely as this gave prospects of potential economic development since the US military had recaptured the Afghan territory (Hart, 2012). The impediments to Afghanistan economic growth through the strategyOn the contrary, the strategy has impediments to which the likelihood of success dwindles because of these facts. For one, the Afghan government headed by Hamid Karzai is the greatest hurdle toward the realization of progressiveness for the nation because of corruption (Hart, 2012).

This means that part of his government may support the activities of the Al-Qaeda by accepting bribes from the heavily funded network hence thwarting efforts of the US army in flushing the extremists out. Secondly, possible withdrawal by the US troops in the nation after their time line expires would mean that the strategy would most likely fail. In essence, the possibility of this occurrence will heighten especially when the troops will not have completed training the Afghanistan military troops on how keep the extremists at bay.

This would in turn make the nation return to terrorist captivity hence gagging all economic related activities. 2. The ability of the US to facilitate reconstruction of AfghanistanEssentially, the US used the de facto partitioning strategy as a way of preventing future terrorist attacks on the US soil hence applying all possible mechanisms to achieve success for the plan (Press Secretary, 2009). On the contrary, the US agreed that the strategy would be costly for the US, but the need to secure the US borders was more vital.

The US president promised deployment of extra military troops at a cost of thirty billion dollars due the understanding (Press Secretary, 2009). Therefore, America has the financial muscle to sustain the cause according to set timeframes. As part of the rebuilding process, the US pledged to foster training for the Afghan troops that would translate to capacity building for the nation. For instance, the training provided would be on effective combat tactics that would help in containing the extremists from taking over the nation in the future.

According to president Obama, their Afghan responsibility was vital in assuring security within the US border that will facilitate nation and economic building at whatever cost. The duration of the reconstruction processSequentially, the appropriate time for the US troops to hand over responsibility to Afghan troops once the war on the terror has reached exhaustion. However, the transition process from US military to the Afghan security forces would be smooth with the US pledging to continue to give security advice to the Afghan forces (Dorronsoro, 2011).

Additionally, the US president insisted that US troops would continue being Afghanistan for another eighteen months because of the financial repercussions that the strategy would have if prolonged. Ultimately, the extra funding on the military would yield results despite the cost because this process will inch the US step closer in to preventing future terrorism on US soil (Press Secretary, 2009). A Marshall plan with a fixed budget and durationIdeally, the Marshall plan was a monetary strategy applied by the US to help in the rebuilding of Europe after the second world.

In essence, the Marshall plan was to take effect for a period of one and a half years with increased expenditure on military in order to revitalize Afghanistan economically (Press Secretary, 2009). Therefore, the implementation of this plan would help revamp industries, lift trade barriers and in the end assure Afghanistan of economic prosperity. Essentially, the implementation of this is a post-war strategy that would help the nation rebuild infrastructure that the war on terror had imparted.

Therefore, a Marshall plan for Afghanistan would be the initial steps in to reconstructing the nation economy. ReferencesDorronsoro, G. (2011). AFGHANISTAN: THE IMPOSSIBLE TRANSITION. Carnegie Endowment for International peace. Retrieved on Feb. 16, 2013, from http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/06/15/afghanistan-impossible-transition/1ijHart, M. (2012). West Afghan Hopes Collide with Reality. National Interest; Issue 118, p8Office of the Press Secretary. (2009). The Way Forward in Afghanistan.

The White House. Rodriguez, D. M. (2011). Leaving Afghanistan to the Afghans. US Army Forces Command.