Framers of the Constitution - Essay Example

From the work, it is evident that in previous times, states had more autonomy (Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, & Soderlund, 2011).  In the latter years, the states came together to revise a few of the confederation articles, there was a need for the states to create a new form of ruling as prescribed in the constitution. According to Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky & Soderlund (2011), this conference led to an agreement on how power would be separated between the existing state organs. The constitution architects came to an agreement that all states would respect the constitution - which contracted freedom to all citizens. This is an elucidation of the fact that no local or state governments were given consent to create any laws. The constitution is, nonetheless, believed to be at center stage in ascribing freedoms to all citizens. Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky & Soderlund (2011) insist that the constitution not only protects the freedoms and rights of individuals but also restricts the chances that these rights will be violated.

The national authority can be equated to the federal government which contains the executive arm that defends and supports the law of the land. Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky & Soderlund (2011) say that the makers of the constitution came up with national authority to govern people and obtain power from them. Through the division of powers in the federal government, the state organs can address the local issues in a state. Matters touching on the state are also weighed by the federal government, as well as coming up with solutions to the problems.

The sectional interests, on the other hand, include a national group of persons that were given the mandate to advocate for ideas in the country, and champion the implementation of the same ideas (Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, & Soderlund, 2011). The constitution framers as seen in the argument of Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, & Soderlund (2011) aimed at serving the interests of various sections of the community that have an influential say in the state. For instance, a group of people would campaign against the government’s idea of banning marijuana for medical use.

Lastly, the constitution makers ensured that local self-government is involved in the running of policy programs in the state. The form of devolution that rested powers on the local government ensured that the local governments had a say in the eligibility and worth of the projects coined by the federal government (Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, & Soderlund, 2011). This eliminated any aspects of inequality of development and sharing of resources at the local levels.