International relations - Essay Example

International Relations Introduction If the GDP of is used as a measure of power then it means that countries with the strongest GDP may develop the affinity for more power and hence become more aggressive and intolerant. The GDP indicates that the country has enough wealth and resources that it may use to manipulate the economies of other smaller countries or subject them to unnecessary conditions (Goldstein, Whitworth, and Pevehouse 342). When the country becomes aggressive, it therefore means that it will take advantage of its economic superiority and wealth to exploit and upset the global balance of power.

This can be detrimental if there no other stronger economies to watch over or counter the influence of the economically superior country. At least, there should be countries with better GDP that can form a stronger coalition to resist the aggressive actions of the former.GDP as a Measure of PowerFrom the Goldstein text, United States appears to be one of the countries with strongest GDP of up to 14,000. U.S. has been seen in so many occasions undertaking military interventions in war-torn regions with the purpose of maintaining peace.

Its superiority is therefore not in question but it aggressiveness and interest in these interventions begs some stream of answers. With such strong economy and wealth, it can use its influence to advance selfish interests that it may harbor (Goldstein, Whitworth, and Pevehouse 475). This can be so aggressive to the extent of undermining the sovereignty of other territorial boundaries. It may become even more intolerant to other small economies that questions its advancements, or may identify viable resources in other territorial regions that it may want to benefit from.

This aggressiveness may not be possible to counter if the other countries are so weak economically that they cannot form a coalition to deal with the aggressive country.In this case, three countries may form a coalition that may be able to stop counter the actions of the United States in case it decides to go aggressive and wreak havoc on other economies or countries since they cannot match its s0uperiority. Among the countries capable of countering such a wave include China; with GDP of 9,500, Japan with GDP of 4, 400 and Germany with GDP of 3000.

When combined their coalition can wield a combined GDP of 16, 900 capable of toppling the might of U.S in case it goes intolerably aggressive. U.S has been known for its superiority in advancing the aims of maintaining the world’s stability though. However, its interest may surpass that of the common global good. The vast resources that have been instrumental in consolidating its GDP give it an upper hand manipulating other economies for its own economic gains (Goldstein, Whitworth, and Pevehouse 478).

When a three-tier coalition of China, Japan and Germany is built, they may be able to deal with the aggressiveness of U.S. in case it decides to do so. They will bring their resources together, to combine and create a formidable force that the economy of U.S may at long run fail to sustain. Japan and China may work together for the sake of the rest of the world as they incorporate Germany into the tangle. If such a case erupts, there may be undertones of a war that might lead to devastating effects (Goldstein, Whitworth, and Pevehouse 499).

However, when others support the coalition to stop U.S from being too aggressive, things may be amicably squared.Based on the GDP as a measure of power U.S is the strongest and hence may take advantage of its economic superiority to advance its interests that limits the sovereignty of other territorial boundaries. A coalition of China, Japan and Germany may be able to reconcile such advancement for the common good of the rest of the world.Work CitedGoldstein, Joshua S, Sandra Whitworth, and Jon C.

Pevehouse. International Relations. Toronto: Pearson Canada, 2012. Print.