Download file to see previous pages...
This theory is ambiguous and has raised different controversies for a long time. It presumed that elites and political leaders compete but at the same time, they are restrained. Schumpeter attempted to combine two principles, elitism, and democracy.
Democratic elitism thus may be justified as democracy as it protects democratic orders from intolerant and unsophisticated values using strong commitments of the values of the elites. Elite theory tries to explain power relationships in modern society. The theory asserts that minority group in society comprising of members from policy-making and upper economic class poses most power. Further, the power they hold is autonomous of a nation’s democratic election process. Via positions in corporate boards and companies, and influence over key political, economic and social decision making process; these individuals “the elite” are in a position to exert significant power over policy decisions of the government and big corporations (Schumpeter 84).
The readiness of elites to take unpopular actions, tolerate dissent, and most of their logical belief systems are sufficient weapons to preserve democracy. It is also logical to argue that, elites come together or unite to form a goal that is of the interest of the local citizens. This may be associated with pluralism, a word that is used in most as a synonym for democracy. When pluralism exists in a society, then there is hope for democracy, since one cannot do without the other. Policy packages are developed and presented by elites and leaders of close advisors in accordance to the incoming interests of the people. Elites stage announcements of their agendas in the media, who in turn depict the leaders as major agents of change.
In the previous decades, the notion of increasing citizen involvement in political activities and decision-making has found favor with consumer groups, students, and politicians with
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Amongst India’s sixty-year-old democratic experiment, achievement is the sheer durability of its liberal constitution. Almost all countries that gained independence in the post-WWII wave of decolonization have failed to carry out open and just elections, shield and boost essential rights, and uphold the civilian rule of the military.
Varied experts and academicians tend to hold that the nonexistence of war amidst democratic states tends to be the only and perhaps significant empirical fact that one comes across in one’s study of international relations. Even a general perusal of the related historical facts tends to establish the fact that in case of the democratic states there is a stark aversion to the use of military power to settle the impending political, economic or geographic issues (Newman & Rich 2004, p.
So far, the president has concentrated on promoting the issues that have turned out successfully such as the Obama healthcare plan which was introduced during his past term in the office and seems to be garnering popularity amongst many people (Siegel). However, there are still a number of other subjects that need to be addressed such as the creation of jobs which even though has risen since his term in office, the rate does not seem to have satisfied a large number of people and has been sued by the opposition to campaign against his credibility for a second term in office.
On a similar theme, these objectives of democracy can be achieved if they are mutual participation of both the governing authorities and the people under the leadership. Apparently, one major way in which the people can participate in the democracy is by electing the individuals they feel are best suited for the various administrative duties.
Democracy comes from two Greek words: demos which means "people" and kratein which means "to rule". These two words are joined together to form democracy, literally meaning "rule by the people". The definition of democracy has been expanded, however, to describe a philosophy that insists on the right and the capacity of a people, acting either directly or through representatives, to control their institutions for their own purposes.
The democratic peace theory states that nations which have adopted democracy as a form of governance, are less likely to wage war against each other, because democracy is closer to peace than any other form of governance.
The author states that people of different cultures and civilizations cannot live without clashes and conflicts in existing "states-nations" of the European pattern. And therefore the immigration policy of modern Europeans is self-destructive and threatens to lead to war the future generations.
Quite a few people, it seems, are swayed towards choosing Sen. Barack Obama from Illinois as their next President. He is ahead in the polls by most accounts, and early voting will most likely favor Barack Obama. According
The anarchy resulting from such a civil disobedience not only confuses the government, but also is a potential threat to the stability of the nation’s politics as well as economy. Different people think
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Elite Theory/Democracy Q: Can democratic elitism justifiably be called democratic (Schwarzmantel) for FREE!