Role of Supra-National Organizations in the 2011 Crises - Essay Example

Supra-national organizations ensure that humanity around the globe is protected against dictator leadership and human right violation.

The mistreatment of the people in Libya and victims of the Arab Spring should have been a concern for the supra-national organizations. The political leaders in Africa for example in Libya use their power to oppress the minority. These leaders deny their subjects their human rights and make their lives miserable under their rule. The success of NATO depended on the chance of Libya emerging as a stable democratic nation. The success of supra-national organizations is dependent on their objectives. Doubts have been cast over the responsibility of networks to protect vulnerable populations.

Supra-national organizations can protect the vulnerable by ensuring there are fair elections among less democratic states. Such states are exposed to unfair elections and election violence, as well as oppressive rules. However, the supra-national organizations have legal authority only over member states. This means that cases of Libya and the Arab Spring can be handled by the African Union or the United Nation among others. This legal right of membership is the reason why Falk questions NATO’s involvement with Libyan issues.

Conclusively, networks may be a threat to governments; however, confronting them is not a simple task. This is because the interaction of individuals through the internet is the cause of the expansion of networks. Supra-national organizations must ensure every person around the globe practices his or her human rights. NATO intervention in Libya might be questioned, but despite going against the UN, NATO’s move might have saved the lives of many individuals in Libya.