Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution - Admission/Application Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Their ideal type of government was like the one that existed under the Articles of Confederation. They wanted individuals and states…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution"

The anti-federalists were a group of people that believed in having a federal government that was weaker than the individual governments. Their ideal type of government was like the one that existed under the Articles of Confederation. They wanted individuals and states to have the most power and the most control over what happened in the government. The national government should not be able to overrule the states. It should function as a way of providing essential services that the nation needed, like negotiating treaties and raising an army, but beyond a few vital functions, the federal government should be weak.
When the Constitution was drafted, anti-federalists resisted it. They wrote and gave speeches against the Constitution in their home states and urged people to vote against ratification. Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams were two of the most vocal anti-federalists. They were concerned that several provisions in the constitution would lead to a central government that could take away the rights of individuals and states.
The first reason anti-federalists resisted ratification of the Constitution was the way the executive branch was established. They viewed the office of President with skepticism. To the anti-federalists, this position looked too much like a monarchy. The patriots had just thrown off the chains of monarchy and anti-federalist’s did not want to reestablish anything that even resembled a monarchy. They feared that giving any one person power would result in abuses. The presidency as constituted in the executive branch looked like it had the potential to develop into a king.
A second reason the anti-federalists opposed the Constitution was the idea of individualism. Patrick Henry wanted the influence of local government and local individuals to stay strong. He was a strong believer in individual liberty and felt that the best way to maintain that liberty was to give local and state governments the most power. Centralization of power was a theme the anti-federalists wanted to fight in every possible way. A strong federal government was just a step away from tyranny, according to anti-federalist thought. They believed that there should be checks on power, and that the checks and balances in the Constitution that worked between the three branches of the federal government were insufficient. The anti-federalists felt that the real check on the power of the federal government should be the state governments.
A final reason the anti-federalists would not support the Constitution is the fact that it lacked guarantees for individual rights and privileges (Brands, 2011). They insisted on a Bill of Rights for the Constitution. This argument was the one that was strongest and resonated with the most people. The Anti-federalists wanted guarantees about certain rights such as freedom of religion and speech. Federalists argued that the Constitution could not spell out every right that people should have. Still, the anti-federalists felt that some guarantees should be put in place. During the ratification process, many states agreed with the anti-federalists at this point, going so far as to make suggestions about what rights should be added after ratification. The Bill of Rights was added after the Constitution was ratified. This marked a partial victory for the anti-federalists.

Work Cited
Brands, H. W. American Stories: A History of the United States. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2011. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.)
Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution Admission/Application Essay. Retrieved from
(Why Did Antifederalists Oppose Constitution Admission/Application Essay)
Why Did Antifederalists Oppose Constitution Admission/Application Essay.
“Why Did Antifederalists Oppose Constitution Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution


...? The Bill of Rights Importance in the Justice System The foundation of the American criminal justice system is located within the U.S. Constitution, specifically in the Bill of Rights, the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution which guarantees every U.S. citizen certain fundamental liberties and rights. With regard to criminal procedures, the foremost of these rights is the assumption of innocence. Though not explicitly written into the Constitution, this presumption has been interpreted by several court rulings as implied in the Eighth and Fifth Amendments. It has become a fundamental right that is universally recognized by the courts and public alike. Under this presumption,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...Baker vs. Carr in promoting Democracy and Constitutional Government: The American constitution provides for a democratic form of government. Democracy is a system of majority rule, characterized by the notion of a one man one vote system.In 1788, the United States constitution adopted the notion of natural freedom and equality1.The provisions of this constitution provided for an elected government, and it was concerned with the civil rights and liberties of all America citizens. Due to these changes in the constitution, democracy was entrenched in the social lives of all America citizens. During this period, democracy led to a political, social and...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Federalists v. AntiFederalists

...Full Full A Critique of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists Positions on the American Constitution with Emphasis on the Bill of Rights The ratification of the current United States Constitution went through a long process of nationwide consultative processes that was also wrought with huge controversies from individuals and groups with special interests in business, agriculture or political inclinations regarding the implications of the constitution to the afore stated interests. The view held and maintained by each of these groups was based on their perceived projection as to what lay in stock for them once the constitution either came into force or...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay


..."Our Unconstitutional Congress - Congress spending money on programs not d in the Constitution" is an article by Stephen Moore that criticizes the way Congress appropriates federal funds. His main point is that, though the Constitution empowered Congress to allocate or spend government funds, these powers are only limited and is very specific. And at present, the way Congress spends federal funds, it is going beyond the powers that the Constitution vested it. In the article of Moore, he claimed that in the earlier days, the federal government only had limited funds and only a number of things to spend on. Today however, federal budget amounts to billions of dollars and it subsidizes on...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Constitution

...THE CONSTITUTION The argument that the creation of the Constitution was a conflict founded on competing economic and financial interests by two groups of individuals - those who expected to gain benefits from its approval and those who oppose its ill-effects - was pioneered by Charles A. Beard. In 1913, Beard compiled diverse scholarly views and documents regarding the founding of the Constitution consequently referred to as 'The Economic Interpretation of the Constitution.' Beard's arguments have not been refuted until this day. Beard's thesis suggests that, although he is not meaning to imply that the Federalists created the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Thesis

Federalists and the AntiFederalists

.... One of the best associates the Federalists had in their effort to get the Constitution ratified was of the provisions given for the ratification of Article VII of the Constitution. Federalist leaders returned to their states after the Constitution was created at the Constitutional Convention, in order to elect Federalist delegates to the conventions in the states. By the year 1790, all the thirteen states of America had ratified the document, giving the Constitution and the Federalists their victory. Though the Constitution was created, which was not in favor of the Anti-Federalist, there efforts did not go...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Oppose National Identification Cards

...Issues of the Real ID Act as Grounds for Opposition President Bush signed into law the Real ID Act of 2005 or HR. 418 on May 11. 2005. This was introduced by Congressman James Sensenbrenner, as part of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror and Tsunami Relief 2005 (Hann). Upon enactment, the act had been controversial ever since and a major concern for many citizens with personal and privacy concerns. State governments wanted to dissent from this act as well but for financial reasons as participating to such means huge pecuniary burdens for them. After all, if the act was to proceed, states would be responsible for a humungous total of about $23 Billion, spread over a 10-year period... of the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay


...General Welfare General Welfare The phrase “general welfare” has consistently made appearance in most books of the law and constitutions of most nations. McGee (2014) notes that not only does its appearance make a general representation of the law, but it also brings about a grey area which most people are yet to comprehend. General welfare has also made its appearance in parts of the constitution of United States such as in the description of the role of the congress on article 1 section 8 of the constitution. In as far as, it is an implied term; it is very notable how its meaning can be extrapolated to issues such as health all of which are issues of concern to both the government and...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The Antifederalists: critics of the constitution

... The Anti-federalists: Critics of the Constitution Question The thesis of the article centers on the voices of the Anti-federalists who felt the US Constitution did not advocate for equal rights of both black and the whites during the creation of the federal system of governance. The author has attempted to project real and critical debate that underscored the implication of the American Revolution, as well as the direction of the US future. As indicated in the article, America consisted of various groups that had distinct economic, social, and political life. In essence, Main has succeeded in showing that the efforts of the Anti-federalists were for the advantage of all as opposed to a certain section of the society. Question 2... The...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay


...The Constitution A constitution is a that establishes how an organization, country or is governed. It gives the laws to be adhered to and the principles, which are core to that organization. The American constitution was written in the year 1789 by our founding fathers. The American constitution aims at providing a better system of governance and provides checks and balances through which they can monitor the performance of the government. It also established three branches of the government (the judiciary, the executive and the legislative arms of government) and further gives each arm different and separate powers. The constitution also helps to unite...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Admission/Application Essay on topic Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution for FREE!

Contact Us