Rights and Responsibilities: The Responsibility to Protect - Outline Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The study determines whether the ‘combat on terror’ and the humanitarian communication are being used as new misinformation imitating the genuine motives for eliminating war. The research aims at answering how the ‘struggle on terror’ and the humanitarian communication reveal the use of information. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Rights and Responsibilities: The Responsibility to Protect
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Rights and Responsibilities: The Responsibility to Protect"

Rights and Responsibilities: The responsibility to protect Terrorism and humanitarian intervention Background information
The New York and Washington terrorist attacks on September, 2001, and following changes to geopolitics and global associations, seem to have contributed to a change in the humanitarian intervention. The use of humanitarian intervention is very important in the attack of Afghanistan and Iraq, in addition to this, the principle of humanitarian intervention needs to be examined. The study attempts to determine whether the ‘combat on terror’ and the humanitarian communication are just being used as new misinformation imitating the genuine motives for eliminating war. The research aims at answering how the ‘struggle on terror’ and the humanitarian communication reveal the use of information that imitates the genuine motives for eliminating war.
Literature review
Humanitarian researchers argued that, some humanitarian crises that were motivated politically could only be handled by crucial movements of state authority (Crovelli, 2007).Previously, compassionate action was not involved in humanitarian activities, and accepted within the humanitarian freedom a region free of political meddling beneath what can be referred to as a principle of silent impartiality (Abiew, 2010).
This theory was accomplished by the (ICRC) International Committee of the Red Cross in the civil war of 1967-1970 in Nigerian-Biafran (Bajoria, 2008). Researchers and other human activists stimulated a political humanitarian achievement (Barber, 2009). In the beginning, it was the role of the government to provide humanitarian liberation even though the violating government failed to give permission (Abebe, 2009). The notion of humanitarian intervention about the right to interfere with humanitarian basis was second-handed by the UN in Iraq and Somalia during the 1991 and 1992, and in 1994 by the France government in Rwanda (Abbott, 2005). Complete application of this method to humanitarian achievement came in to shape United Nations Protection Force activity in Bosnia during 1994-95 (Dantiki, 2005).
Evidence indicated that United Nations Protection Force function was to transport humanitarian assistance to refugees, and the surrounded civilian people in towns experiencing wars in areas like Sarajevo (Fisher, 2007). Alternatively, the main weakness of this method was that the interference did not denote stopping the real hostility that was leading to humanitarian catastrophe (Focarelli, 2008). The UN military force was only authorized to protect them, or defend the humanitarian workforce seeking to hand out aid to the civilians (Gutierrez, 2006). The military was indispensable on some occasions, where they aimed at controlling loss of life or cultural cleansing (Hehir, 2005). More research needs to be done so as to reveal more information on terrorism and humanitarian intervention.
The conclusion of this research will be used to present information on terrorism and humanitarian intervention.
The study will be based on library research where historical documents related to humanitarian intervention will be reviewed. Data will be analysed using qualitative methods.
Outline of timescale
Week one; proposal writing
Week two; collection of data
Week three; analysis of data
Week four; report writing and presentation
Abbott, C., 2005. Rights and Responsibilities:  The Dilemma of Humanitarian Intervention.  Global Dialogue 7:1-15. Winter 2005.
Abebe, A., 2009. Displacement of Civilians During Armed Conflict in the Light of the Case Law of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission.  Leiden Journal of International Law 22:823-851.
Abiew, F., 2010. Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Redefining a Role for "Kind-Hearted Gunmen."  Criminal Justice Ethics 29:93-109 August 2010.
Boggs, C., 2005. Imperial Delusions. UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Bajoria, J., 2008.The Dilemma of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Barber, R., 2009. Facilitating Humanitarian Assistance in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross 91:371-397 June 2009.
Cottey, A., 2008. Beyond Humanitarian Intervention:  The New Politics of Peacekeeping and Intervention.  Contemporary Politics 14:429-446 December 2008. Available online at:
Crovelli, M., 2007. Humanitarian Intervention and the State. Mises Institute working paper. Available online at:
Dantiki, S., 2005. Organizing for Peace:  Collective Action Problems and Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 7:1-21 Spring 2005.
Fisher, D., 2007. Domestic Regulation of International Humanitarian Relief in Disasters and Armed Conflict: A Comparative Analysis. International Review of the Red Cross 89:345-372 June 2007.
Focarelli, C., 2008. The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine and Humanitarian Intervention: Too Many Ambiguities for a Working Doctrine.  Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13:191-213 June 2008.
Gierycz, D., 2010. From Humanitarian Intervention HI to Responsibility to Protect R2P.  Criminal Justice Ethics 29:110-128 August 2010.
Gutierrez, P., 2006. The Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law and the International Criminal Tribunals.  International Review of the Red Cross 88:65-86 March 2006.
Hehir, A., 2005.  Institutionalising Impermanence:  Kosovo and the Limits of Intervention.  Global Dialogue 7:115-124,Winter 2005. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The topic has to be discussed with the writer Outline”, n.d.)
The topic has to be discussed with the writer Outline. Retrieved from
(The Topic Has to Be Discussed With the Writer Outline)
The Topic Has to Be Discussed With the Writer Outline.
“The Topic Has to Be Discussed With the Writer Outline”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Rights and Responsibilities: The Responsibility to Protect

The responsibility to protect

...of sovereignty, national leaders are accountable for their own actions, and nations are accountable to the international bodies for how that nation treats its populace (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, p. 12). The Responsibility to Protect The Responsibility to Protect doctrine has its genesis on 2000, when the Canadian government commissioned the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) to examine how human rights, intervention and state sovereignty are related. This request was spurred by the events in Rwanda, where 800,000 people died through genocide, and Somalia, Srebrenica and East Timor...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

The Intervention in Libya: Responsibility to Protect

...?Does the intervention in Libya represent a consolidation and advancement of R2P (either as a norm or as an operational concept)? The intervention ofNATO in Libya could be observed as an act to protect the civilians from atrocity crimes with the moral support of the international community which assumes the ‘responsibility to protect’ people. As such, it can be seen that the United States’ intervention in Libya was an attempt to protect the human rights of the people there. United Nations recognised the necessity of protecting human rights in Libya and gave backing to the concept of R2P in the year 2005 which led to the military intervention in Libya to protect the people from atrocity crimes which began in 2011. The UN’s first... though it...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Law - Responsibility to Protect

...?Responsibility to Protect This paper will explore the relationship between politics and law at the international level, and the importance of such arelationship. It discusses the legitimacy and practicality of pursuing the Responsibility to Protect (henceforth referred to as R2P) approach to international human rights, in those countries where the rule of law or civil order has broken down. The Responsibility to Protect (henceforth referred to as R2P) is a commitment arrived at by international convention as a concerted response to the Rwanda massacre. R2P received formal approval as an international...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Employee Rights and Responsibilities

...? Case #3 – Harding Space, Inc. Case #3 - Harding Space, Inc. Question 8 There are sta y rights of employees involved in this situation. These are the rights provided by the federal or state law. Sickness benefit. In the first paragraph of the case, it was mentioned that the sick leave, medical and hospitalization benefits are being reviewed to determine how they can reduce labor costs. Sickness benefit is a statutory right of an employee; thus, the company is aware that they cannot totally eliminate this benefit but they can try to reduce it (Lawpack Publishing Limited, 2010). Time off. In the Harding Space case, the firm was also looking at “payments for time not worked” as a possible...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Responsibility to Protect

...? From Humanitarian Intervention to the Notion of the Responsibility to Protect: A Theoretical or Practical Shift? Table of contents Introduction 3 War Crimes, Genocide and Crimes against Humanity 4 Research Objectives, Question & Outline 5 Chapter 1: Literature review 7 1.1 Tension 7 1.2 Debate 13 Chapter 2: Case study 20 2.1 Darfur 20 Chapter 3: Looking forward 26 Conclusion 31 Sources Used 32 Bibliography 34 Introduction One of the most significant discussions in legal and moral philosophy is protecting human rights. Throughout history, states were fighting each others for the reason of extending their power and authority, generally by invading other states. Often, the...
24 Pages(6000 words)Dissertation

Responsibility to Protect and Obstacles in Its Implementations

...? Responsibility to Protect and Obstacles in its Implementations Introduction The centuries-old dialectic between sovereignty and human rights appeared to undertake a fundamental re-alignment when the General Assembly recognized the new concept of "responsibility to protect"1 at the 2005 UN Summit. In paragraphs 138 and 139 of the Outcome Document ofthe Summit, the Assembly endorsed the principle that sovereignty was not just a right but a responsibility, and established that all nations have a "responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Humanitarian Intervention-The Responsibility to Protect Development the UN in delivering humanitarian intervention. For a long time, humanitarian intervention has been more of a practice than a doctrine as it reflects aspects of moral image and political gain. Drawing a line of the legality of humanitarian intervention using unauthorised military action to resolve dispute and the operation of the international law is a big challenge. The concept of Responsibility to Protect which is recognized by the UN Assembly calls for measures to protect citizens against war crimes, ethnic cleansing, genocide and crimes against humanity. In essence, humanitarian intervention reflects on the ways in which one or more states intervenes in addressing the threat or...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Employee rights and employee responsibilities

...from which they have been historically excluded (SEP, 2005). When affirmative action involves preferential treatment by basis of race, gender, religion or ethnicity, affirmative action generates controversy. While some experts believe that preferential treatment of women and other racial minorities sort of compensates for discrimination against them in the past, other experts believe that preferential treatment of minorities today, benefits individuals who have not experienced past wrongs while burdening individuals who were not responsible for past wrongs, thus tantamount to reverse discrimination. Another reason for the controversy is that the Civil Rights Act provides that no person shall be...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Responsibility to Protect

...or will not safeguard its citizens from genocide or other actions deemed as a crime against humanity. All nations' sovereignty is respected as is their ability to conduct their own affairs but this is a qualified condition, not one that is considered absolute. "When peaceful means are exhausted and leaders of a UN member state are 'manifestly failing to protect their populations,' then other states have the responsibility to take collective action through the Security Council" (O'Neill, 2006). In some respects, the concept of "Responsibility to Protect" was founded in the common concern for human rights worldwide, the concept that initiated the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Implementing the Responsibility to Protect

...opposition to the authority of the sovereign state might be heavily armed and overpower the head of state such as the then situation in Somalia. Under such circumstances, the sovereignty of the state is threatened and international assistance becomes appropriate, in restoring the state security. Mostly, sovereignty failure undermines international relations because; the developed countries would feel skeptical in working with the states where the human rights is not given priority. Often, such countries are categorized as those that cannot protect the basic rights of the citizens, therefore, have failed in their primary responsibility (UN report 11). In order to...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Outline on topic Rights and Responsibilities: The Responsibility to Protect for FREE!

Contact Us