Rights and Responsibilities: The Responsibility to Protect - Outline Example

Rights and Responsibilities: The responsibility to protect Terrorism and humanitarian intervention Background information The New York and Washington terrorist attacks on September, 2001, and following changes to geopolitics and global associations, seem to have contributed to a change in the humanitarian intervention. The use of humanitarian intervention is very important in the attack of Afghanistan and Iraq, in addition to this, the principle of humanitarian intervention needs to be examined.

The study attempts to determine whether the ‘combat on terror’ and the humanitarian communication are just being used as new misinformation imitating the genuine motives for eliminating war. The research aims at answering how the ‘struggle on terror’ and the humanitarian communication reveal the use of information that imitates the genuine motives for eliminating war. Literature review Humanitarian researchers argued that, some humanitarian crises that were motivated politically could only be handled by crucial movements of state authority (Crovelli, 2007).

Previously, compassionate action was not involved in humanitarian activities, and accepted within the humanitarian freedom a region free of political meddling beneath what can be referred to as a principle of silent impartiality (Abiew, 2010). This theory was accomplished by the (ICRC) International Committee of the Red Cross in the civil war of 1967-1970 in Nigerian-Biafran (Bajoria, 2008). Researchers and other human activists stimulated a political humanitarian achievement (Barber, 2009). In the beginning, it was the role of the government to provide humanitarian liberation even though the violating government failed to give permission (Abebe, 2009).

The notion of humanitarian intervention about the right to interfere with humanitarian basis was second-handed by the UN in Iraq and Somalia during the 1991 and 1992, and in 1994 by the France government in Rwanda (Abbott, 2005). Complete application of this method to humanitarian achievement came in to shape United Nations Protection Force activity in Bosnia during 1994-95 (Dantiki, 2005). Evidence indicated that United Nations Protection Force function was to transport humanitarian assistance to refugees, and the surrounded civilian people in towns experiencing wars in areas like Sarajevo (Fisher, 2007).

Alternatively, the main weakness of this method was that the interference did not denote stopping the real hostility that was leading to humanitarian catastrophe (Focarelli, 2008). The UN military force was only authorized to protect them, or defend the humanitarian workforce seeking to hand out aid to the civilians (Gutierrez, 2006). The military was indispensable on some occasions, where they aimed at controlling loss of life or cultural cleansing (Hehir, 2005). More research needs to be done so as to reveal more information on terrorism and humanitarian intervention.

Justification The conclusion of this research will be used to present information on terrorism and humanitarian intervention. Methodology The study will be based on library research where historical documents related to humanitarian intervention will be reviewed. Data will be analysed using qualitative methods. Outline of timescale Week one; proposal writing Week two; collection of data Week three; analysis of data Week four; report writing and presentation References Abbott, C., 2005. Rights and Responsibilities:  The Dilemma of Humanitarian Intervention.

  Global Dialogue 7:1-15. Winter 2005. Abebe, A., 2009. Displacement of Civilians During Armed Conflict in the Light of the Case Law of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission.  Leiden Journal of International Law 22:823-851. Abiew, F., 2010. Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Redefining a Role for "Kind-Hearted Gunmen."  Criminal Justice Ethics 29:93-109 August 2010. Boggs, C., 2005. Imperial Delusions. UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. Bajoria, J., 2008.

The Dilemma of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Barber, R., 2009. Facilitating Humanitarian Assistance in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross 91:371-397 June 2009. Cottey, A., 2008. Beyond Humanitarian Intervention:  The New Politics of Peacekeeping and Intervention.  Contemporary Politics 14:429-446 December 2008. Available online at:  http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoah&AN=17551305 Crovelli, M., 2007. Humanitarian Intervention and the State.

Mises Institute working paper. Available online at:  http://mises.org/journals/scholar/crovelli2.pdf Dantiki, S., 2005. Organizing for Peace:  Collective Action Problems and Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 7:1-21 Spring 2005. Fisher, D., 2007. Domestic Regulation of International Humanitarian Relief in Disasters and Armed Conflict: A Comparative Analysis. International Review of the Red Cross 89:345-372 June 2007. Focarelli, C., 2008. The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine and Humanitarian Intervention: Too Many Ambiguities for a Working Doctrine.

  Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13:191-213 June 2008. Gierycz, D., 2010. From Humanitarian Intervention HI to Responsibility to Protect R2P.  Criminal Justice Ethics 29:110-128 August 2010. Gutierrez, P., 2006. The Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law and the International Criminal Tribunals.  International Review of the Red Cross 88:65-86 March 2006. Hehir, A., 2005.  Institutionalising Impermanence:  Kosovo and the Limits of Intervention.  Global Dialogue 7:115-124,Winter 2005.