Types of Democracies - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
According two British political philosophers, James Mill and Jeremy Bentham described a protective democracy as a type of government that is formed with the main aim of protecting liberty rights of countries citizens. The two philosophers had a soft spot for democratic…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Types of Democracies
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Types of Democracies"

Types of democracies According two British political philosophers, James Mill and Jeremy Bentham described a protective democracy asa type of government that is formed with the main aim of protecting liberty rights of countries citizens. The two philosophers had a soft spot for democratic governments which led Bentham into developing the utilitarian theory which supports the need for a liberal government system. The utilitarian theory goes hand in hand with the liberal theory that supports the need for any government to do greatest good for the greatest number of citizens.
Bentham and Mill argued that a protective democracy must have the ability to participate in free and fair elections, right to free press, universal male suffrage, secret ballot and frequent elections make up the bulk of protective democracy. In such a democracy the government ought to ensure that there is disparity in the sharing of resources unlike any other system of governance where political leaders only serve their personal interests. The utilitarian theory therefore teaches the need for government to protect both the people and the capitalist markets. Excesses of protective democracies could hurt the capitalist markets since most people will assume security from the government making them poor and property less due to liberal anxiety. Another shortcoming of a protective democracy is that the government assumes that inequality will still exist therefore they are less concerned about potential threats that could be created by such an inequality. Protective democracies assume a negative view of the people.
Developmental democracies have the advantage of assuming a positive view of the people. Unlike the protective democracy, this model encourages people to be assertive developers who can create their own wealth despite the government mediation during harsh economic times. Political and social analysts are opposed to this model stating that there can never be such a government where its citizens are equal and uninformed about political happenings in their countries. This cannot be true at any time and if it was a reality then it will be a hindrance to democratic politics.
Pluralist democracy is a democracy that attempts to correct the inefficiencies of a developmental democracy. This model gives people the power to be free and participate in the political activities of their countries. It encourages competitive elections where even the less active people in the society can have a right to vote. The main disadvantage of a pluralist democracy is that not all people can be disinterested in politics and if so then the most popular leaders among them should take charge of the government. The pluralist model can be seen to be more effective than its predecessors.
The participatory model is based on the developmental model of democracy thus it has the advantages of fostering political participation; it motivates people into practicing civil virtue. A setback associated with participatory democracy is the need for restructuring of bureaucracies and industrialized societies so as to accommodate all citizens and give them a chance to participate in decision making (Syd, 2011, p 45).
The role of citizenship changes depending on the democratic model since each model gives emphasis to a certain specific aspect of life. For instance; developmental democracies favor people in such a way that it induces them into participating in economic activities. Generally, the names give a clue on the role the government expects its citizens to play. The models of democracy identified above have the power to influence how campaigns and elections will be conducted under a given model since there will be a change of policies and need for political parties to refocus their political agenda.
The American democracy at one stage or the other has represented most of these forms of democracies. Example the participatory model arose in the 1960’s after a political turbulence hit the United States. It had similar characteristics to developmental democracies. This shows how the functions of a democracy are bound to change depending on the situation and government focus.
Syd, B. (2011). The simultaneous policy: Voting for Global peace and justice. New York. Simplot Press Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Types of Democracies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Types of Democracies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(Types of Democracies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Types of Democracies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“Types of Democracies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Types of Democracies

Personality Types

...?PAP: Assessment and learning techniques The personality profile derived from the Myers – Briggs Type Indicator was d as INTJ – standing for Introverted, iNtuitive, Thinking and Judgemental. The score attained on the factor of introversion was 19; on intuition was 23, on thinking it was 22 and on Judgement also it was 22. An INTJ personality is characterised by a strong need for understanding and accomplishment; and a desire to view all things from a logical and objective standpoint. They prefer to interact with a few close persons than a number of acquaintances; as social interaction wears them out. They are abstract thinkers who love to understand events and objects as much as possible, and are frustrated by any...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Modern Democracies

...and legally what is to be deemed the will of a community which is not unanimous” (Bryce, and Bryce 20). Keeping in accord to this definition if the modern systems of governance are followed, mainly two types of approaches towards democracy can be found, namely: multi partisan and bipartisan. In a democratic system as the common people have the sole authority to select the government by their voting power, thus, depending on their political ideology, creed, and dependence on political system parties are formed and they aim at functioning as the representatives of common people in the context of conveying their requirements to the government. In a bipartisan political structure as that of the United States...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Democracies and Progress

...? Democracies and Progress Democracies and Progress Briefly discuss, in one to two paragraphs, different types of democracies and explain where the U.S. fits in and why There are three types of democracy in the world today. These are the moderate, liberal, and extremist forms of democracy. In liberal democracy, the state in question has very little influence or control over the lives of its citizens. In addition, liberal democracies do not visit stringent rules on their citizens or force them to follow given directions where the subject of politics is concerned. The United States would...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Are Democracies Inherently Peaceful

...? Are Democracies Inherently Peaceful? Introduction The last few years witnessed strong people’s movements against monocratic rule in countries like Egypt, Syria, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. The experience of these countries clearly indicates the awfulness of monocracy and military rule. The main reason people oppose monocracy and military rule is that countries led by such ruling systems are more likely to engage in wars and other type of international conflicts as compared to democratic system. Citizens of those states cannot obtain a peaceful living environment and this situation adversely affects their quality of living. As compared to monocracy, oligocracy, or military rule, democracies are inherently peaceful unless... they are...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


...? Democracies Undoubtedly, the United s of America evolved as one of the early liberal democracies in the history after Switzerland (an independent federation and not a democracy according to the modern definitions) in 1219. The civil rights and their liberties were protected and were safeguarded in the Constitution of the United States in 1788 while it was presented for the elected government. Democracy has become a complete guideline and the way of living; having its root deep down in social, economic and political equality on the American frontline. However, different inaugurals, studies, and declarations such as; The Four Freedoms which were presented by Franklin D....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The British Constitution And Modern Democracies

...The British Constitution And Modern Democracies Introduction The British constitution is quite different from other constitutions in modern democracies, like Americas. The UK constitution is unwritten, meaning it lacks a single document that expresses how Britain, its people, and affairs are governed. However, as a motherland to most of the modern democracies nations’ constitutions, its un-codified form has remained the same, but with continued development. When the forefathers of the United States borrowed a lot law matters from ancient superior England, they saw the need to codify the established their constitution for purposes of coherence and strict adherence. Therefore, UK’s rules...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Liberal Democracies

...freedom and democracy - that is not prevailing there at all. There are still about 700,000 million people who are not able to have even a single drop of drinking water a day for them (Gangal, 2007). Then Pakistan is also there with almost a hopeless social, political and economic condition - always dwindling between a peculiar democracy, militarism and ages old kinship tribal type of feudalism. Tremendous unemployment, illiteracy combined with lawlessness with ever burgeoning centres of terrorism are a few factors that always keep on contributing to Pakistan's political and economic bankruptcy. African democracies have near complete chaos in majority of countries with...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Pluralists Democracies

...Pluralists Democracies: Country Studies Tony Blair is recognized as the longest-serving prime minister of Great Britain's Labor party. Having been one of the most influential prime ministers of the United Kingdom, he instituted various political changes including constitutional reforms. In his regime, he has been both criticized and credited for his strong advocacy for the labor group which in fact, makes the labor party the center of the British Politics. He is recognized for his pro-market policies which are in contrast with the more collectivist policies that are previously espoused (Jones 2004). I agree that the Labor Party should be given attention to any economy since human capital is essential both in developed an...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Characteristics of Democracies

...s 4 October The American government has been facing a lot of flak for its economic policies; the recent recession has really knocked the stuffing out of the people. Unemployment rate is consistently increasing and this is bad news for the country. The American government’s credit rating was recently downgraded this again goes to show how troubled the government of America really is. This paper will shed light upon two aspects which are really important to the constitutional democracy of America. Minority rights are extremely important, people in minorities migrate to America to live a better life but they get exploited and suffer a lot because of the weak minority rights. Racism is still prevalent in America, minority...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Democracies around the World

...Democracy in South Africa number Democracy in South Africa Democracy is something that can be said to have reached South Africa only after the system of apartheid was completely removed. This historic event took place in 1994 and the movement was led by Nelson Mandela. Following this, however, efforts were taken to ensure the stability of future governments. This can be seen in the combination of parliamentary and presidential forms of governments. While some studies have referred to the parliamentary system as the more durable form of government based on its reliance on the party and not the individual (Maeda & Nishikawa, 2006), a combination of the two can be used to create harmony between different sections of the society... owing to...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Types of Democracies for FREE!

Contact Us