Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"What did Machiavelli claim it is better for the Prince to be-feared or loved- and why Why is this important for later political thought"
with a personal 20% discount.
Download file to see previous pages...
Whereas punishing or execution harm only the person who commits crimes, crime that goes unpunished harms the whole community by causing disorders. Therefore for the sake of the betterment of an entire community, the individual who commits crimes should not go unpunished. (Laine 90-94) Yet since punishment or execution has a close association with cruelty and brutality, a prince must carefully temper it with prudence and humanity. Indeed a prince’s strict adherence to the executions of crimes contributes to the conjuration of his image as one who champions laws and punishes disorder.
Machiavelli claims that it is better for a price “to be feared than loved”, though ideally he should be both “love and feared” (Machiavelli 45). When a prince cannot both be loved and feared, it is “much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with” (Machiavelli 45). In support of his position, Machiavelli argues that people in general are “ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, anxious to flee danger, and covetous of gain.” (Machiavelli 45). When the prince is far away from dangers, they will show their eagerness to sacrifice their lives for him. But when the prince is in real dangers, they will abandon him; even they will turn against him, as Machiavelli notes, “they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you” (Machiavelli 45). According to him, breaking the bond of love at odd times is much easier than a bond of fear, friendships and love can be earned by payments. In this regard, Machiavelli says, “men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails” (Machiavelli
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
But on deeper introspection, it can be seen that ‘The Prince’ is a discourse on power and the exercise of it. In simple words, it is a logical and strong substantiation of the age-old saying- ‘power corrupts.’ The narrative is pregnant with an element of satire, an altered eye that provides an outside and chilling perspective of what power is all about.
Most modern readers have alleged that prince represents someone whose destiny was to take over the control of the country. The prince just like other prince in Machiavelli’s princes, he must be careful on democracy in order to gain people’s favor (Machiavelli 43).
He sought to employ the use of logos to appeal to his readers’ minds in ways that could make his arguments authentic. By citing real historical and contemporary leaders, Machiavelli managed to convince his readers that his argumenta were based on matters, which worked in real life.
Machiavelli wrote “The Prince” as an instructional manual for a Renaissance ruler. Some of the secular aspects of governance have changed much since the time of Machiavelli, and as the ruler, I will follow what is relevant and practical in the present political scenario in the world.
The theory of Machiavelli has generated a lot of heat among many scholars, some portraying him as a teacher of evil an advocate of tyrannical leadership, a subject of criticism in contemporary leadership. Into his idea of use of the army and soldiers to exalt power and the use of cruelty to possess kingships, he seems to advocate for abuse of power and denial of liberality in the political spheres.
In its entirety, the book champions the aspects of politics1. In this sense, Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideals were in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic doctrines, which gave directions on how to consider politics and ethics. A common view among political philosophers concerning Niccolo Machiavelli’s book was that there subsists an exceptional affiliation between moral goodness and legitimate authority.
uld always serve for benefit. Machiavelli knew that France was thriving under the principality of one Prince and, being a patriot, wanted this prosperity for his motherland. Machiavelli also wanted the book to help him return the favor of the Medici family (the writing was
The book was being banded on "Index of prohibited books " due to Machiavelli use of free will, evil man-ship, and negative behavior. The book can be counted as a reaction to Machiavelli life's problems as he lived during a time of serious political decline in Italy when Italy was being overrun and subdued by the French.
During his time, the leaders were to act in the face of conflicting personal and societal conflicts. The ideals of a leader should be anchored on the fundamental protection of the citizens interest and at the same time nurture a personal legacy through creating
flicts, Machiavelli sought to highlight areas of weakness and strength that had made ancient and leaders of the time fall or preserve their rules respectively. To present his blueprint on how to maintain power effectively, Machiavelli partitioned The Prince into sections that
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic What did Machiavelli claim it is better for the Prince to be-feared or loved- and why Why is this important for later political thought for FREE!