History and Political Science and Why United States Was Able to Defeat England - Research Paper Example

History and Political Science Compare the leading personalities on both sides in an explanation as to why United s was able to defeat England. Initially, it seemed that Britain had military might as compared to United States as the empire had enormous resources, huge piles of arm and military prowess. In contrast, America had small arms, little money, and no ships but they had an advantage over the distance involved in war as a huge ocean separated them from their enemies. Although Americans were poorly trained, hundreds of American soldiers could materialize from nowhere completing military balance and upsetting Britain plans (Monroe 3-14).

In addition, international assistance from French, Holland, and Spain who had declared war in Britain played a significant role. They were also familiar with territory and local resource of labor and food. Americans also perceived this war as the second war of impendence and fought with enthusiasm. In addition, many Americans believed that England sought to humiliate them as a sovereign country. American land forces had improved in both quality and leadership. There was renewed sense of nationhood and urge to avenge indignities suffered by Americans (Newman 23-31).

Discuss the strength and weaknesses of structure of government as defined by article of confederation. Article of confederation was a form of union of thirteen independent states and bases of America constitution. The weaknesses were lack of power by the states to collect taxes, trade regulation was denied to states, law needed nine of thirteen sates for approval, no executive branch, lack of national court system, and amendments could only be done if all members agreed. The greatest advantage of this confederation was that it allowed for fair development of land to the west of Appalachians.

Secondly, it led to the signing of peace treaty with Great Britain. Thirdly, it led to the expansion of United States territory from Atlantic to Mississippi river, set up department of foreign affairs and finally it led to states honoring legal acts of the states (Merrill 134-56).Explain the significance of the fugitive slave act and three- fifth clause, how did the two concepts affect political power and what issues can be derived from them. An analysis of this clause all point to the framers intention to deny that it neither prohibited nor allowed slave trade.

The clause refers to other economic or social class but does not refer slave as an economic class. However, location of seats in congress and number of people to be taxed although only three fifth led to slaves being considered as human beings. It also led to return of fugitives slaves (Boyd 9- 21).Characterize the debate over slavery in America immediately following the revolution. Immediately after revolution abolition was conceived, it did not fade until civil war. Abolition began as an elite group although religious leader were involved.

It began as an appeal to people of colors especially the blacks and women. It led to unease over legitimacy of slavery. With the evolution, there was emergence of first broad based abolitionist movement and organizations. It led to congress to adopt measures against slavery that were pushed by abolitionist. Additionally there was temporal suspension of slavery in some states (Burt web).Works CitedBurt, LeRoy. “The United States, Great Britain and British North America from Revolution to the Establishment of Peace After the War of 1812.

” New Haven: Yale University Press. 2006. Print. Merrill, Jensen. The Articles of confederation: an interpretation of the social-constitutional history of the American Revolution, 1774–1781 . Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. 1959. Print. Monroe, James. “The Second War of Independence and Upsurge of Nationalism.” N.d. Web 11 March 2012. Newman, Richard. The Transformation of American Abolitionism: Fighting Slavery in the Early Republic. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. 2002 .PrintBoyd, Susan.

“A Look into the Constitutional Understanding of Slavery.” New York: Res Publica. 1995. Print.