Floating cities vs colonial America - Essay Example

Floating Cities Vs Colonial America The Seasteading Institute builds permanent dwellings or homesteads on the sea for people to live in the marine surrounding. The people involved in the organization and those who led the revolutionary war are both top civilians in the nation. They are among the highest ranking citizens. For example, the liberalists such as the founder of PayPal who support the floating cities are high ranking, rich and influential individuals. The leaders of the America revolutionary war were also high ranking, influential and top officials especially from the military, most of them holding ranks of commanders.

Most of these people are also Native Americans. The differences between them include the fact that liberalists are mostly rich citizens who have well-established businesses with no affiliation to the government. They do not work for the government and they want to break away from it. The leaders of the American revolutionary war work for the government through the military. They support the government and are against anyone who opposes it, including the liberalists (David, p. 12). I do not think that the colonial cities offer the same opportunities that colonial America offered citizens of other nations.

This is because the founders of these floating cities want to be liberalized and are motivated by breaking as far away from the government as possible. They want to offer their people greater opportunities that the colonial America never offered to its people (Edward, p. 4). The classes of people going to participate in the floating cities are an important factor to the political development of these cities. This is because most of the people sponsoring the development of these cities are the wealthy people such as landowners, businessmen and other high ranking individuals.

Therefore, this is the select group of people that can be able to belong to the floating cities. The ordinary poor person cannot afford to have a say in these cities unless they are simply taken there to be passive citizens (Lawrence & Robert, p 105). I think that these floating cities would turn out the same as any other nation politically. According to the theory of social contract by Thomas Hobbes, individuals will only unite into common political societies when they mutually consent to accept duties and abide by common rules.

The founders of these floating cities are all motivated by the disgruntlement from the government. According to this theory, a rational individual would easily give up his or her rational freedom voluntarily so as to enjoy the benefits of a particular political order. In this case, the liberalists who intend to move to the floating cities will easily be motivated to obey the political order of the cities because they want to break away from the colonial America (Petit, p. 47). The floating cities might face problems that arise from everyone having too much power.

Since these floating cities are established by the wealthy and high ranking individuals, it may be difficult to fully determine who can best lead the others and who is willing to give up control yet they all spent a lot of money to establish these cities. The participants in the floating cities are motivated by breaking away from being ruled by a government that they deem ineffective. Other important issues also include safety and security and access to materials found on dry land (Stephen, p. 92).Works citedDavid, M.

Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale: Yale University Press, 2004. Print.Edward, O. W. Sociology: The New Synthesis. Harvard: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000. Print.Lawrence, R. J. & Robert, Y. S. Politicians Dont Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Print.Pettit, P. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Print.Stephen, S. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton.

Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1997. Print.