The 1994 Mexican Peso crisis was a monetary disaster that reverberated throughout the world.Brought on by Mexico's "Tequila Crisis" ,the peso's fixed exchange rate against the dollar "plunged by around 50% within six months…
Download file to see previous pages...
The 1994 Mexican Peso crisis was a monetary disaster that reverberated throughout the world.Brought on by Mexico's "Tequila Crisis" ,the peso's fixed exchange rate against the dollar "plunged by around 50% within six months..This in turn caused the local-currency value of the government's large dollar-linked debts to swell enormously and sent Mexico into a deep recession". Through the help of the United States and others, Mexico's economy has since rebounded nicely, but is not growing at a rate that many experts would consider desirable. To be sure, the scars of the 1994 crisis will be apparent in Mexico for years to come.The impact of the currency crisis on Mexico's financial sector was especially severe. "Stacks of bad, even fraudulent, loans by the recently privatised banks were exposed. Many banks went bust. Thousands of Mexicans, particularly in the new middle class, defaulted on loans as interest rates rocketed, and had their homes repossessed. In 1995 GDP shrank by 6.2%". The devastation of this collapse had an impact that reverberated throughout the region, and was amplified by Mexico's recent ascension to the North American Free Trade Agreement.The new free trade block in North America demonstrated the ripple effect that a financial crisis in one country can have with its main trading partners.
The existence of NAFTA, while a hazard to the United States due to this vulnerability to problems plaguing another country, constituted a life raft for Mexico because it ensured that the United States would need to make a greater effort than it otherwise might to assist Mexico. "President Bill Clinton reasoned that Mexico, then America's third-largest trading partner, must be helped because of its importance to American jobs and investment. His administration arranged a $40-billion standby loan--in the words of Robert Rubin, then the treasury secretary, not so much 'for the sake of Mexico, despite our special relationship, but to protect ourselves'" (par. 3).
Nevertheless, it has been argued that NAFTA was one of the primary contributing factors to the currency crisis. Maskooki asserts that "Mexico's joining NAFTA, and ensuing trade liberalization and deregulation of capital market and banking stimulated large capital flows in the form of portfolio investment. Banks and the capital account transactions were liberalized before adequate regulation and supervision measures were in place. The result was an excessive accumulation of external credit and an unprecedented lending boom driven mostly by moral hazard. The availability of foreign capital promoted excessive borrowing by both the public and private sectors. As Mexican economic fundamentals deteriorated and the peso became overvalued, foreign portfolio funds reversed direction leading to the peso devaluation" (par. 12). Indeed, it is no accident that the currency collapse occurred within a few months of Mexico's ascension to NAFTA.
Maskooki also notes that NAFTA ignored the need to coordinate economic cooperation among its members in light of Mexico's relatively primitive economic situation. "NAFTA did not effectively address issues concerning macroeconomic coordination and monetary cooperation amongst the trading partners or provide an adequate safety net while Mexico was undergoing rapid deregulation and liberalization of its economy. There was a lack of coordination of economic policies among NAFTA partners. Most notably, the impact of the US monetary policy, and its ramification for Mexico's small and debtridden, archaic economy were little understood, and mostly ignored" (para. 10). Much more needed to be done to prepare Mexico for exposure to free trade such an advanced economy as that of the United States.
The deregulation of the banking sector that was called for by NAFTA made Mexico's lack of preparedness quite evident. "NAFTA did not provide Mexican
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This essay mainly focuses on determining certain sets of economic policies, conducted by Argentinian government in the early 2000s, that contributed to the cessation of the economic crunch. On the economic front, the government abandoned convertibility, encouraged industrial reactivation, and introduced price control measures.
I believe this truth is expressed in this movie by the main character. Freedom, either freedom of the mind or freedom of place, either way, every man wants to live in freedom. My proposal is that, man will never be free until he is willing to hope against hope, and take a step towards what other people call impossible.
These have caused many institutions and individual to associate the late 2000’s financial crisis to the financial misfortunes they are currently facing. At this point we need to obtain a clear understanding of this phenomena, financial crisis can simply be used to refer to situation where an underlying financial asset or a financial institution losses much of it value thus resulting into for such institution or the investor current holding on the financial asset ( Lansky,2010).
The oil monopoly in the country's Pemex, is owned by the state meaning that all the revenues proceed directly into federal government. This way, about a third of the income of the government depends on the oil. Other than investing in the development of new fields, the Mexican government treats Pemex more of a cash cow as it tries to maximize the short-term profits.
Research Methodology: In order to obtain relevant research information, literature sources were used to streamline meaningful data, which would give a snapshot preview of the general course of dissertation. As explained through PEST/SWOT
According to purchasing power parity, price levels should be equal worldwide (Shapiro, 2006: pp 135). This implies that if and are the periodic price-level increases (rates of inflation) for the US and the Zeal, respectively; is the spot exchange rate between the Zeal peso and the US dollar at the beginning of the period and is the spot exchange rate in period t, then
The aforementioned has been asserted by several development scholars, with the crux of their argument being that widespread chronic and absolute poverty in any given society is a symptom of underdevelopment and an obstacle to development, with the inference being that poverty alleviation and development policies are coterminous (Sawhill, 1988; Korzeniewics and Smith, 2000; Moller et al., 2003; Ellis and Freeman, 2004; Cornwall and Brock, 2005).
on an American enterprise entering Mexico, followed by a brief history of the history of the Mexican peso then an analysis will be conducted as to the prospects of this currency in the near to late future.
There are two types of currency risk associated with investing in Mexico
This was day that Mexico’s Secretary of Finance flew to Washington, DC to announce that Mexico was in danger of defaulting because its foreign debt was unmanageable. Some external debts were falling due yet Mexico could not raise a loan
The impact of NAFTA on Mexico and its economy have important implications for the American economic and political interests. Some critical factors in revisiting NAFTA, as was recommended by several policy makers, include its consequences for Mexico and how
10 Pages(2500 words)Admission/Application Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic 1994 Mexican Peso Crisis for FREE!