We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Machiavelli The prince - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Name Instructor History and Political Science Date Machiavelli the Prince Niccolo Machiavelli is a controversial theorist who has had a great influence on the social political realms in the contemporary society today. In his theory, he advocated for autonomous political rules and the use of tyrannical strategies in implementing leadership in political systems…
Download full paper
Machiavelli The prince
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Machiavelli The prince

Download file to see previous pages... Although some scholars perceive his theories as real and well grounded, there is a lot of opposition to the kind of power that Machiavelli advocates for. In reality, Machiavelli, in his political theories, propounded a doctrine of evil, contrary to the expectation of the contemporary political democracy. Machiavelli claims that naturally political leaders are bound to offend those who they govern to gain power over them and be able to control them. He explicitly states that there is a natural and ordinary necessity that “… one must always offend those over whom he becomes a prince…” to express his regard for the need of offense to exercise power over the citizens in a political sphere (8). Many critics have argued that these words of Machiavelli point out to a domineering kingship which ensures that the subjects of political systems are subdued to the worship of the king. In other words, the best king is one who is able to induce fear among his subjects to make them obedient and abiding to his leadership strategies. In the contemporary political systems, there is more criticism of autocratic leadership and use of force, torture or cruelty to suppress the opinions or ideas of the public. Democrats have advocated that leaders be more considerate of the public opinions to formulate a more integrative leadership and better governing principles. Reflecting on the words of Machiavelli, he is a proponent of evil leadership, a leadership that has no place in the modern political systems. Another reason why Machiavelli has been criticized as a preacher of evil is because of his advocacy for use of brute force rather than diplomacy in conquering enemies. He employs an analogical reference of the leadership of Moses and Cyrus who were both, in his opinion, armed with a force to drive their nations to success. Machiavelli provides that leaders have two options, either to beg to use force, yet he warns that “In the first case they always come to ill and never accomplish anything….” (23). Here, he suggests that leaders have to use force while handling their enemies otherwise they are doomed to fail. The evil that Machiavelli preaches here is that all nations rise against their enemies, engage their armed forces to conquer their enemies. Contemporarily, diplomacy is perceived to be a superior tool in initiating crisis management between rivalry countries. In modern political systems, the principles of Machiavelli seem to be completely inverted version of successful leadership. Today engagement of forces among rivalry countries is an in formidable evil that cannot be tolerated in the political spheres. From his theory, mercy, faith and love are sources of weaknesses of in political leaders and hatred, cruelty and exploitation are admirable in leadership. Machiavelli points out that the combat skills of a leader depend on their ability to use force and laws to maintain faith in the public domain. While recognizing that use of laws is more human and that use of forces is meant for animals, he proposes that both be engaged in political leadership. He commends that it is best to choose “…the fox and the lion…” because a prudent leaders should not show faith to the people (69). Critics have found a lot of evil in this statement that presumes that a ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Machiavelli: The Prince and St. Thomas More: Utopia
Machiavelli wrote in The Prince the qualities that is necessary for a prince to have. In the list of the qualities that a prince or ruler should have, he excluded the four cardinal virtues of Greek political philosophy.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Machiavelli The Prince
But on deeper introspection, it can be seen that ‘The Prince’ is a discourse on power and the exercise of it. In simple words, it is a logical and strong substantiation of the age-old saying- ‘power corrupts.’ The narrative is pregnant with an element of satire, an altered eye that provides an outside and chilling perspective of what power is all about.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Machiavelli the Prince
Most modern readers have alleged that prince represents someone whose destiny was to take over the control of the country. The prince just like other prince in Machiavelli’s princes, he must be careful on democracy in order to gain people’s favor (Machiavelli 43).
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince (1532)
He sought to employ the use of logos to appeal to his readers’ minds in ways that could make his arguments authentic. By citing real historical and contemporary leaders, Machiavelli managed to convince his readers that his argumenta were based on matters, which worked in real life.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Machiavelli The Prince
Machiavelli wrote “The Prince” as an instructional manual for a Renaissance ruler. Some of the secular aspects of governance have changed much since the time of Machiavelli, and as the ruler, I will follow what is relevant and practical in the present political scenario in the world.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Machiavelli The Prince
uld always serve for benefit. Machiavelli knew that France was thriving under the principality of one Prince and, being a patriot, wanted this prosperity for his motherland. Machiavelli also wanted the book to help him return the favor of the Medici family (the writing was
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
District Court or Circuit Court
Falwell, 2004). Mr. Lamparello sued the Rev. Falwell and his conjunctive ministries first in the actions taken involving the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The Prince by Machiavelli: A Response Paper
The book was being banded on "Index of prohibited books " due to Machiavelli use of free will, evil man-ship, and negative behavior. The book can be counted as a reaction to Machiavelli life's problems as he lived during a time of serious political decline in Italy when Italy was being overrun and subdued by the French.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Sociological Theorists
First, Durkheim explains each component of the society in terms of the functions it plays to the stability of the entire society (Isajiw, 2003). Durkheim can be credited for his
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Machiavelli The Prince
During his time, the leaders were to act in the face of conflicting personal and societal conflicts. The ideals of a leader should be anchored on the fundamental protection of the citizens interest and at the same time nurture a personal legacy through creating
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Analysis of the text The Prince by Machiavelli
flicts, Machiavelli sought to highlight areas of weakness and strength that had made ancient and leaders of the time fall or preserve their rules respectively. To present his blueprint on how to maintain power effectively, Machiavelli partitioned The Prince into sections that
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Machiavelli The prince for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us