We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

How effective is Parliament in ensuring executive accountability - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
How effective is Parliament in ensuring Executive Accountability? Author’s Name Institutional Affiliation Abstract As the work of the executive today has become more complex, the work of monitoring its accountability is vital for effective administration…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
How effective is Parliament in ensuring executive accountability
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
How effective is Parliament in ensuring executive accountability

Download file to see previous pages... This paper will look at the select committees and how they play a role in holding the executive accountable as some part of the parliament agencies. The Ministerial Question Time and the advantages and disadvantages that come with it are also discussed. This helps understand or determine whether the parliament has been effective in ensuring that the executive is accountable in what they do. Keywords: Executive, Government, Select Committee, Ministerial Question Time, Accountability Introduction Accountability is an aspect required in every kind of administration. In the U.K., the House of Lords and the House of Commons both have select committees that scrutinize their operations. Ministerial Question Time is also used as a method of scrutiny parliament. It is used as a way to hold the executive branch of the government into account of what they do. This paper discusses the different types of select committees, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as Ministerial Question Time and the advantages and Disadvantages associated with it. Select committees Select committees work in both houses; that is, the House of Commons and House of Lords. Most consist of eleven members who are chosen by the members of the parliament from their own parties. Their work is to check and report on areas ranging from the work of government departments to economic affairs. The report is usually published and sometimes discussed in the parliament. When the report is presented to the parliament, the government is given an average of sixty days to respond to the report. Generally, the select committees have limited power as they can request the attendance of ministers, but the ministers have an option of availing or not availing themselves. Before, the chairs of the each Select Committee used to be chosen by a select committee that was largely influenced by the government the party whips. Today, the chairs are normally chosen according to the Wright Committee proposals of 2009 through an AV election by all MPs (“Select Committees”, n.d.). Explain different types of select committees and identify the advantages and disadvantages of each as well There are two committees which differ in their responsibilities. First, there is the House of Commons Select Committee or the departmental Select committee. It has a minimum of 11 members as said earlier, who decide on how they will conduct their inquiry and then gather written and oral evidence. This Select Committee is given the work of examining the work of the government departments; that is, their expenditure, administration and policies of the government (“Select Commitees,” n.d.). The advantage of the Select Committee of the House of Common is that their mandate is not very limited, as some committees have roles that go beyond the boundaries of the department. They are also allowed to appoint specialist advisers, who advise them on particular matters, but these appointees are not permanent they are paid on a daily basis (“Select Commitees,” n.d.). The Select Committee of the House of Lords usually concentrates on four main areas; that is, Europe, science, economics, and the constitution of United Kingdom. Each are has been put under a committee that is, the European Union committee, and the rest follows (“Select Commitees,” n.d.). The committee members under the House of Lords ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Work Place Module II
Work Place Module II. Accountability has become a key issue in various sectors. It entails procedures and processes through which individual parties take responsibilities for their activities. Accountability in healthcare provision, parties involved can be held accountable for; professional competence, financial performance, public health promotion, legal and ethical conduct, community benefit, and financial performance (Dowdle 2006).
18 Pages(4500 words)Essay
Public Law - Parliamentary Sovereignty
The doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty is entrenched within the British constitution as essential in the operation of the separation of powers and the leading decision in R v Jordan highlighted the point that the judiciary was bound by Parliament and could not challenge Parliamentary authority when interpreting and applying legislation.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
How the Compliance with International Environmental Law Can be Made More Effective and Enhanced
The Governing Bodies and Organizations for Implementation and Enforcement 9 3.1 The United Nations 9 3.2 The European Union 12 4. The Existing Mechanism for Implementation and Enforcement 14 4.1 Environmental Impact Assessment 15 4.2 Strategic Environmental Asssessment 16 4.3 Environmental Policy Integration 17 4.4 The Mechanism for Implementation in the European Union 18 5.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
How to maintain effective accountability in project management
Thus, in order to effectively manage projects in an increasingly changing and dynamic society, the information technology and business world has put more emphasis on maintaining high standards of accountability in project management, which many project shareholders and managers believe is essential in successful completion of a project as a result of improved management system (Barron & Barron, 2011).
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
POLITICS how effective is parliament in ensuring executive accountability
Accountability is important because it makes the executive answer to the public on the ways it spends money and exercises powers invested in it by the constitution (www.parliament.uk, 2013). It further ensures that those to whom executive powers are given exercise them fully and fairly in the interest of the public and according to law.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Parliament
The party that follows after the one with a majority takes the position of the official opposition while those members who do not belong to any political party are known as independent members (Maqee, 2008).
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Accountability of Public Finances
For matters to do with financial reporting and audit matters the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) acts as the watchdog. The committee is required to look into the accounts of government entities and those that are
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Compere and contrast the presidential and parliamentary institutional structures in Canada and the U.S includes executive, legislature and judiciary
In a bid to understand these two systems, this essay will compare and contrast the two structures of governance. It will also explore the variances that exist in the relationship between the executive, legislature, and the judiciary in the two systems.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic How effective is Parliament in ensuring executive accountability for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us