Global Studies - Term Paper Example

On the other hand, Khan argues that dictatorship is a way the government officials opt to use leadership positions to influences processes to their own benefits (17). It is an obvious assumption that dictatorship is only meant for the benefit of the commanding officer or officers in the government. Across the globe, many nations governed by dictatorship have very low per capita income and live in deplorable conditions. This is an indication that democracy is a key instrument in the development of a country.

However, Held points out that democracy slow down democracy (12). He supports his argument by arguing that if every option by every citizen is to be considered before making a decision, most countries would not have made any decisions in terms of development and implementing policies (Held 12). For this reason, dictatorship seems to be the solution for a fast development option in any country. The fewer considerations a government makes, the less time it would take for it to develop the country.

However, dictatorship is a dreadful form leadership; and citizens fight for democracy until their will is fulfilled. The battle for democracy may be disastrous to a country. Regardless of the strides made in development, the battle for democracy may ruin the development record of any country (Held 56). The growth of a country based on extractive political institutions is not sustainable. The factors that makes this leadership style significant or long term will be discussed in broad detail. Additionally, why countries do not use dictatorship if there are ways to address the factors that may cause only short term development is also relevant.

In analyzing the report on per capital income by the World Bank 2011, there are revelations that dictatorship is enemy of development. Comparing a nation like Zimbabwe and the United States makes the argument simpler. Zimbabwe is in position 198 in terms of per capita income and a nation like Botswana is in position 98 (World Bank 1). Zimbabwe is more of a dictatorship nation while Botswana is a democratic nation. The development record of these two nations cannot be compared and this can be attributed to the different leadership styles by the two nations.

However, Zimbabwe has many resources and a larger human resource force. From this analysis, one may easily point out that dictatorship has led to the decline of economy in Zimbabwe. The same case applies to any other nation that uses dictatorship on its citizens. Khan points out that sustaining development under dictatorship is difficult since the government lacks support of its citizens and numerous NGOs (78). This minimizes the chances of investments and donors to government projects. The argument is supported by Held who points out that the support of citizens and other institutions on government projects is important to sustain the economy and development of a country (123).

Governments depend on funding and loans from financial bodies. However, most of these bodies do not support regimes that use dictatorship. The global war for democracy has been influenced by the lack of support to regimes that use dictatorship. Apart from the lack of financial support, dictator governments are always at a risk of political revolution (Benhabib 96). In recent years political revolutions have crippled many nations. Nations suffer great loss to their economy after a