no. Date Theoretical Underpinning of two International Relations Theories In Slaughter’s “Problems Will Be Global-And Solutions Will Be, Too” the main emphasis is on the changes in the polarity of international politics (1)…
Download file to see previous pages...
On the other hand, in “After America” Brzezinski looks at the imminent fall of the United States from being the leading power in the world (1). The writer focuses on which states are likely to take over from the United States, although he emphasizes that a unipolar world is no longer possible (1). There is also an analysis of how other states will react to the fall of the United states, for example, stating that most second world countries will seek to form regional blocks. Brzezinski is pessimistic about the future, without the United States at the top, and argues that power struggles will ensue between states, especially over regional politics (1). All the same, there is a correspondence between the two articles in that they both consider the future of international relations in the next ten or so years. In addition, the two articles point out the looming power gap that will be caused by the exit of the United States from the apex of global relations. Personally, Slaughter’s argument is more compelling since she gives room for non-biased assessment of international relations, after the end of the united state’s hegemony (1). ...
argument, not because it is more liberal and thus more optimistic but because her assessment of international relations seems better researched, and the solutions given to the various problems seem more realistic. Considering Brzezinski’s argument, in comparison with that of Slaughter, it is clear that the theoretical assumptions between these two writers are different (1). While Slaughter views the next ten years using liberalist lenses, Brzezinski seems to be more oriented towards the realist perspective (1). Nevertheless, both articles seem to make valid points about the future of international relations as both concur that a unilateral system is no longer possible. This has helped me understand why there are so many countries on the rise, including China, Japan, and India. This phenomenon already tells of a multipolar international arena in the next 20 years. This is regardless of whether the world is viewed from a realist or liberalist point of view. Admittedly, the United States will cease to be the super power in the next few years. This means that the United States will no longer be able to influence international policies. Therefore, it is important that the United States revises its domestic, regional, and international policies, in order to be able to with stand the impending change. Works cited Brzezinski, Zbigniew. After America, 2012. Web. 18 June 2013. Available at www.foreignpolicy.com. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. Problems Will Be Global -- And Solutions Will Be, Too, 2011. Web. 18 June 2013. Available at
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The world today has become a system of interdependent states, which need each other to survival in an increasingly competitive international system. This interdependence among states means that they have to find ways of relating with each other in order to maintain international security, even as they pursue their individual interests (Beitz, 1999, pp.
This paper starts with an analysis on the very nature of the states existences and then proceeds to analyze how states interact with each. The author argues that it is because of the growing state necessity to be the global hegemon that states attempt to maximize their world power. States holistically operate in the sense of their own self interest.
In accordance with this, a realist analysis may proceed in evaluating the importance of global security, international hegemony, natural resources, and “democratization” in reference to the NATO deployment in Afghanistan. The justification for the use of NATO forces in Afghanistan is based on the association of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden with the Taliban in the country, who were in control of the State apparatus in 2001 when the 9/11 attacks occurred.
International relations theories are divided into positivist/rationalist theories and post-positivist/reflectivist theories. The former focuses on principally state-level analysis while the latter focuses on the expanded meanings of security with references as to gender, class and other characteristics.
h as the advancement of technologies implied in the worldwide communications, the emergence of global businesses and international trade, multinational companies and the likes. And all of these can be summed up in the celebrated maxim known as globalization, which at the start
The author states that one of the core ideas in Liberal thinking is that of the democratic peace thesis derived from the Kantian maxim claiming that republican (democratic) states do not fight one another. For Kant, the reasoning was simple: democratic states were internally more peaceful due to the pacific effects of international trade.
In the study undertaken, the main objective is to be able to present a view on the International Relations (IR) and other related social theories specifically the postmodernism theory. The present trend of the international community can be viewed towards the trend of globalization and oneness. The interaction can be considered as a significant focus.
This paper concerns the realism and liberalism as the two major theories of international politics. Although they differ with respect to their basic assumptions about the nation-state, the international order and the role of conflict in the international system, both of them provide substantial insight into the ways in which the international order is structured.
In the present day context, there are certain factors that tend to influence the organisations in adding value and enhancing their respective business or operational effectiveness. In this regard, the factors include an increased level of globalisation
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Theoretical Underpinning of two International Relations Theories for FREE!