Comparison between United States and Britain’s Political Economic Systems by Names Macro & Microeconomics, Research Paper 30 May 2013 Thesis: The concept of political economic systems in nations allows examiners to determine the control over goods, services and resources within the society and national boundaries at a particular time…
Download file to see previous pages...
The US government is divided into 3 branches that enable its separation of powers, distinguish the control and power the US president receives once elected, and that of the British prime minister who operates in an undivided government. The party systems of both the US and Britain have a common element of the two party system that impact differently on their governance. Constitution The original constitution in USA resembled a version of the former constitution of Great Britain that came with the colonists, who settled on American land with the hope of reforming the rule to avoid oppression that they experienced under the British system of government back then. A central government was hence formed from the alliances of the different states under a written and signed constitution in 1787 that guides in governing the US, and in its distribution of power (“A more perfect” archives.gov). The constitution hence takes the center place as a superior authority over the law of the land, from which the judiciary interprets in their regular reviews to make judgments based on the legislature, as expressed in the constitution. On the other hand, the British constitution remains customary and unwritten (lack a single constitutional document), such that though the constitution exists, it occurs in distinguishable documents (Williams 13). The sources of its constitution are fragmented into international treaties and agreements, the common law of judicial interpretation, statute law by parliament, and conventions. These differences in existence of the constitution influence their flexibility to amend their constitutions when need be. The lack of codification of the British constitution makes it more flexible and able to evolve with political circumstances, since all that is required is the majority of the parliament to make changes, while the US constitution can be termed as rigid in its codified manner, requiring two thirds of both the senate and house representative, and three quarters of the individual state’s legislature to amend it (Wlliams 13-4). Basically, the US constitution tends to involve different levels of authority from the national figure to all states power, which makes it difficult to change the constitution because of the embedded original idea of federalism. For example, the USA has had about 11000 amendment attempts since 1789, with only 27 being successful after 230 years (Becerra politifact.com) , compared to Britain that recorded numerous reforms affecting referendums, electoral, regional governments and house of lords activities within 1992 to 2001 (“Constitutional reform” historylearningsite.co.uk). The procedure in theUS is quite onerous and intends to prevent arbitrary changes to the original documents, which is extensive enough to allow participation of the relevant authority right from states to national levels that support efficient decision making without being politically biased. Electoral system The US and British elections are conducted by means of secret ballot, involve prior campaigns, and hold by-elections to replace vacant seats in the parliaments. However, there are numerous variations in requirements for electing individuals into branches of the government, in terms
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Comparative between two countries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1479735-comparative-between-two-countries
(Comparative Between Two Countries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Comparative Between Two Countries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1479735-comparative-between-two-countries.
In the span of the period between 1960 and 2002, the developing countries’ share in the world’s export goods grew from one-fourth to one-third; and between 1980 and 2000 their export volume sextupled as compared to the mere tripling of the developed countries export volume.1 The integration of world economy spurred by globalisation has increased trade in general, but developing countries benefited most compared to developed and highly industrialised countries experiencing growth rates as high as twice that of the latter, even whilst real export growth rates slowed down in the face of recession in the period between 1990 and 1991.2 Along with this development, an evident increase in wage
Two firms operating in two different countries and yet facing similar problems are Proctar & Gamble (India) and Unilever (Pakistan). Both firms indulge in more or less the same line of production, manufacturing a wide range of products, from edibles like biscuits to shampoos, soaps, detergents etc.
Here these two countries, Italy and Singapore, will be examined by comparing and contrasting the various elements that compose countries’ particular essences. Italy and Singapore may be on two different sides of the world, but, as it turns out, they have much common ground in addition to how they can be contrasted.
The theory of absolute advantage argued that, citizens of every nation had the ability to improve their economic welfare by specialising in the production of goods in which they possessed an absolute advantage and exporting them to other countries (Ghai and Gupta 2001).
These foreign organizations have been using the country as logistical base for these terrorist groups and provide heavy funding to support terrorism.
The criminal justice system of the United States has certain elements that are not encountered in other western countries in today's world.
on results in the emergence of an international unit possessing all the attributes of an independent state - territory, people, government, and sovereign autonomy. (Premdas 1990:12-31) Or as a temporary measure, may settle for internal self-government within an extensively
For this purpose the published annual reports of one company from each of the countries is selected, namely Wal- Mart Stores Inc.1 from US and Tesco Plc2 from UK. A comparison of annual reporting pattern of each of the companies
Even in such a situation, both countries stand to benefit from trading with one another as long as their relative efficiencies are different. Gains from trade are the net benefits each country enjoys from bilateral trade.
This phenomenon usually leads to strong conflicts in the internal organizational environment especially in regions where unionization is highly developed. It should be noted though that this problem is