Peace, Stability and Coherence - Research Paper Example

It also defines how the IFOR was successful and what caused IPKF's failure. Hence, this paper describes their stance, motive, objectives and reasons.The success of IFOR in Bosnia against the lack of success of Indian troops in Sri Lanka.  CASE STUDIES Compare and contrast the success of IFOR in Bosnia against the lack of success of Indian troops in Sri Lanka.  As a reaction to the prevailing security threat and in the instability faced in many countries, in order to maintain peace and healthy relations organizations like the United Nation are playing their part to sustain the peace on a global platform.

I would like to discuss to major operations held that is the Bosnia’s Implementation Force (IFOR), which was under the guidance of NATO, and the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF), which deals with the interference of India in Sri Lanka when the Civil War occurred. This operation by the two agencies symbolizes the variations which portray how such peaceful operation becomes successful or vice versa. It was observed that the Indians faced a very clear defeat in their three yearlong operations in Sri Lanka, resulting in the failure of IPKF.

On the contrary the IFOR faced immense success in its operation in Bosnia. In my paper I would like to explain why one of the forces was successful while the other faced defeat, what were the positive factors and where did one lack during the entire process. One needs to realize that both these operations occurred in separate era of time and had different influences. The Indian operation happened during the time between 1987 and 1990. Whereas the IFOR operationhappened from 1995 to 1996. It should be noted here that the operation in Sri Lanka was merely the intervention of Indians, on the contrary in Bosnia many different countries and organizations participated.

The way technology has been used later exhibits sophistication and knowledge of various techniques and equipment with proper planning by the force. Apart from that India tried to take over Sri Lanka resulting in the hopes of becoming a super power. Thus their planning was not accurate that ultimately resulted in their failure. The purpose of the Indians was very self-centered and all they did was plan to overcome the Sri Lankans whereas the purpose of the Bosnians was to bring about peace. The difference in approaches determined their way to success and failure.

(Thakur, 2001, 136) The issues that dealt with Bosnia were majorly targeting two things, firstly the non-human activities and secondly the ethnic difference that prevailed between various religious atrocities like Serbians, Croatians and Muslims which was considered to be as “ethnic rivalries” by the media. This was going on since a long time in Bosnia, there was a massacre in Bosnia when a gunman opened fire and killed many peaceful and unified protestors. Moreover events that involved killing of many innocent people at public places also occurred.

Because of this many peace keeping bodies intervened to bring about stability and peace. When the IFOR came to Bosnia they said that they would implement the Dayton Accord compliance, and use force if it was required. Thus IFOR started it operations and throughout the process it faced immense abuses, found illegal weaponry, as well as the not authorized checkpoints of police.( Simulation of conflicts and wars, 69) IFOR started its operation their which was majorly concerned with the military and IPKF on the other hand did not focus on military interventions.

The things that IPKF targeted their operation were to bury the hatchet between Sri Lankan military and the Tamil Eelam liberation Tigers (LTTE) and no focus was