Fulfilling the Promise - Essay Example

Module Fulfilling the Promise People across the world always want to know their history and reconnect with the previous historical events. This goes a long way in connecting people to their culture, which is deeply savored. For example, Americans are deeply connected to the historic events of their nation. This makes America a proud nation since it has unending respect for the people that made the historic actions. This brings the issue of the world wars and the struggle between the world’s super powers.

The countries were in deep cohesion over the control of some resources in the world. However, some countries had their strengths while at the same time having weaknesses. This made it hard to take successful control over these resources that were contentious. It is noted that democracies in the world are not able to sustain long wars especially when they lack the support of the public. When democracies are left alone in the war fields, they are likely to flop since they will not have the ultimate support from the public.

In the same line, Powel quips in with a confirmatory ideology that highlights three key points (Powell 125). First, when a country wants to participate in any war, it should garner enough public support. The public will be instrumental in ensuring the country is attaining what it needs. Secondly, Powel states that a country that wants to engage in any war should have a clearly stated mission (Powell 130). This will assist in conquering the stated parts. Lastly, a country that wishes to engage in war should have an overwhelming support.

As such, a country should be well prepared to tackle their opponents when war erupts. This will assist in ensuring the country wins over its opponents. America as a country is blessed with rich heritage in culture and its historic achievements. This has triggered the need for all its citizens to connect with their history and all the achievements in the American history. To begin with, the American history is a pleasure to a person (Kennedy 1). People are appalled by the achievements, decision making in tricky situations, tragedy befalling its citizens, innovative hope and high drama.

This shows that it is an interesting history that focuses on various incidences that are pleasing, intriguing and informative. Kennedy states that history is a means of knowledge, and it is sometimes used as a means of judgment (Kennedy 2). Kennedy states that history teaches about diversity in a single country, people from different races and ethnicities and other geographical features that are different from each other. Apparently, the history of a country can be used to judge the present. For example, history highlights the need for freedoms, equality and law.

Going by history, these aspects have been developing and becoming more precise. Therefore, the development of these aspects can be used to show the improvement in human nature. This improvement has developed the American tradition to greater heights, which shows justice has been taking a positive improvement in ensuring the American society is achieving its mission of fulfilling its promises. According to Oakes, the cold war was as a result of “ideological, political, military and economic factors” (Oakes and McGerr 733).

Many countries that participated in the cold war had their interests which were to be protected. However, other countries were posing to be a threat in achieving their interests. This led to underground development of opposition between the involved countries. Most of these countries did not openly show the need to indulge in war, but practically, that was what was going to happen. The hitherto planning would mean that there would be an eruption of war, though not even one country had the audacity to start the war.

Though at times allies in the war had their differences, they had to garner each other’s support to succeed in the fight (Oakes and McGerr 736). For example, the “soviet union was committed to communalism and socialism” while “the united states to democracy and capitalism (Oakes and McGerr 733).” Though these two had their differences in formation, they had common interests, which would only be achieved if they worked together. This shows the hard decisions that could be made in tough situations.

The United States in this situation had to use a different approach in clinching a win in the struggle for its interests. The United States of America considered its stand in the war and evaluated its status after the long struggle. This brought a formidable revelation that was shocking the United States. The economy was struggling on its knees and America feared it could get back to the previous years of 1930 where the economy was questionable. The country reconsidered taking “reconversion” approach after it was tired of war (Oakes and McGerr 746).

After the war, the American economy was not stable, and it was threatening to go back to depression that the country had faced previously. Therefore, there was a need to take affirmative action to sprout its economy. The choice for reconversion assisted in strengthening the economy, and this was a perfect move for the country. In conclusion, countries have to pass through a lot in ensuring they are in a stable economic, financial, political and social environment. At times, some countries have to use democratic means of solving issues in regard to their interests.

However, some situations are not solved in a democratic manner and this leads to eruption of war. In the end, the problems are solved amicably within the states that are involved. Using historical events helps countries to make various decisions while focusing on the situation. This states the reason why few countries are ready to engage in wars, since they know the historic repercussions. Works Cited Kennedy, John F. On History. 1962. Oakes James & McGerr Michael., Of the People: A History of the United States.

Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2010. Print. Powell, Wayne P. Tree of Hate: Propaganda and the Prejudices Affecting United States Relations With the Hispanic World, New York: UNM Press, 2008. Print.