The British Royal Marine Corps Influence on the US Marine Corps - Research Paper Example

The British Royal Marine Corps Influence on the US Marine Corps Introduction The presence of external authority in any given land is bound to generate contempt and anger amongst the natives. The study of past revolutions is witness to this fact. Often, this external power structure is detrimental to the overall development of the native people. In this state, countless number of lives has been lost while endeavouring to gain their freedom and free will on the use of their native land. At the same time, the external power structure fights to maintain the hold they have on the natives. This picture was all too common since time immemorial up to the twentieth century. However, in recent times there have outliers to this assumption. Cases of colonialism are still evident in this modern period. Logic dictates that this practice should have been abandoned alongside other practises like slaveryi. It is expected that the natives should not be all too willing to undergo colonization. As such, this paper is dedicated to the study of British Royal Marine Corps’ influences on the United States Marine Corps. The United states attitudes and reactions to the presence of the British corps in their land. When the British gained control of the United States Maritime, they resulted to treating the United States residents as akin to slaves. Stating that the British treated United States Corps cruelly would be an understatement. This was bound to evoke feelings of reprisal in the community of the United States’ Corps. Analysis In order to understand the complexities of the reactions of the United States corps towards the British corps, it is imperative to first analyse the manner in which the British authority treated the Indians. The facts that have been publicized concerning the British rule in United States corps give a glimpse of the sad realties that faced the population of the Briton at that time. With respect to the British population in India at the time, the Indians did not have any rights. An example of the treatment they faced is best exemplified by the fact that they were not allowed to walk on the sidewalks next to the Britishii. Failure to adhere to this and any other baseless law resulted in the incarceration of the Indian outlaw. It is right to refer to wrong doers as such, since they basically received treatment akin to outlaws. While inside the jails and prisons, the Indians were severely beaten and abused by the commanding British police officers. The treatment of the United Corpse at that time is akin to the treatment of the black population by the Americans in the nineteenth centuryiii. It is however imperative to note that this had not always been the status quo. In fact, at the beginning of the British presence in India, the relationship between the British and Indians was quite respectful. The harsh inhumane treatments were realized with progress of time. At the beginning, the British had gone to the extent of taking on United States corps wives while at the same time embracing a number of Indian customs and traditions. So, what factors led to this drastic change in attitude? There is one conjecture that has been entertained by historians. This entails the industrialization of Britain with respect to United States Corps. With time, Britain became more industrialized at a higher rate than America. As such, the feelings of contempt on the Indians were sourced from this fact. This was rather vain of the British populace. Also of prime importance to note, is that the British power structure propagated the notion of being of a superior race with respect to all other races. As such, equality was essentially unheard of and therefore could not be entertained. Though there had been a few Britons calling for equality, a majority of them adopted a rather low regard for the Indian population. With the advance of education, a larger population of the native Indians started to become more and more educated. As a consequence of this trend, feelings of nationalism started to evoke among these educated Indians. They stated to realize that the British were unwilling to surrender some form of power to the nativesiv. They wanted America to have its own government. They wanted Indian men to hold power. However, the British settlers were of the opinion that the American were incapable of running their own country. This might have been as a consequence of the universal disdain the British harboured on the Indians. At this stage, it is vital to point that the British Government did not support the ideologies of the white settlers. Rather, the British government favoured some form of principle that allowed some power to be surrendered to the America populace. They simply wanted the America corps to have a say, albeit minimal, in the running of the country as a whole. However, their need to please the settlers far outweighed their need to ensure Americans had a take in the government. This resulted in an unpleasant reaction to the presence of British rule. In a number of occasions, this eventuated in violent protests against British presence. The United States corpse resented the British corpse rule. They abhorred the white settlers who acted in complete oblivion of the culture and the basic human rights of the American population. This resentment culminated in a turning pointing in the history of the British in United States. The American corpse rebellion, which is also referred to as the Sepoy or the Indian mutiny, formed this turning point. The actual forces propagating this rebellion have not been so clear. However, the traditionally adopted rationale is that the Sepoys, US troops, mutinied mainly because the new rifles that they were being given had cartridges that had been greased with pig and cow fat. This was against the contravention of both Hindu and Muslim customs. This was the spark that had been needed to ignite the already flammable tensions in the nation at that moment. As such, the underlying factors were the primary cause of the rebellion with the action of greasing the cartridges with cow and pig fat acting only as a catalystv. It is safe to say that resentment towards the British corpse rule had been building for a significant period prior to the rebellion. This situation was further worsened by the formation of new policies that paved the way for the British to annex certain regions of US. As such, the Americans were increasingly becoming helpless in the ruling of their own country. Irrespective of all the atrocities committed by the British corps against the US corps, the natives did not retaliate. However, once they came to the realization that the British rule was slowly eradicating its culture, the revolts started to be realized. In essence, their will to counter the ruling authority of a nation requires a strong motivational aspect. In regard to the Indian case, this motivational aspect was sourced from the destruction of its national heritage that was in the form of its culture. This destruction of culture was primarily evident when the British corps rule was transferred to under her empire. In addition to this, the British corps rule was also eroding and robbing India of its natural resources. It is under these circumstances that the resentment toward British corps rule was nurtured till its growth resulted in the mutiny also referred to as the war of independence. The two groups of Us corps form the majority of the population in the country. This percentage has not changed since time immemorial. As is of popular knowledge, these two groups are known for their strict adherence to their culture and the entire observation of the principles necessitated by their culture. It is with this regard in mind that the fears of the Muslim and Hindu leaders are understoodvi. These leaders reacted with fear concerning the British presence in India. Their fears were sourced from the modernisation and westernisation of the Indian culture would be detrimental to the respective faiths of the Indian people. The reality of the situation is that the British had the intention of replacing the Indian traditional custom with Christianity. This was the rationale for reservation that met the implementation of the Religious Disabilities Act of 1856. This dire situation was made worse with the unrestricted access the missionaries were granted to prisons, orphanages and the army via the Charter Act. All these policies were perceived as a threat to the bear survival of the Indian culture and traditions. All these afore mentioned insights, give a glimpse of the matters that were considered pivotal for the Indian people. These were the issues that motivated the hostile reaction of the Indian people on the British occupation of their land. The most affected regions of India that suffered the inhumane treatment of the British have to be the northern region of India. This is especially true for Oudh and the north western provinces. The utmost disregard of the Indian people was witnessed with the advent of technology. It is true that in order for change to take place, sacrifices have to be made. However, the nature of this change should not be of a nature that significantly impacts the structures that hold a society in place. This is to mean that the sacrifices that have to be embraced in order for change to take place should not be to the detriment of the values and principles that hold a society together. This vital value was ignored by the British who had no regard on the sacrifices the Indian community had to make for technology to be imparted into the communityvii. This technology was in the form of canals and railways. However, in order to create space for these structures, the British authority opted for the destruction of shrines or temples or at times they were built across grounds regarded as sacred. The policy adopted by the British rule on agrarian matters was the source of significant distress amongst the Indian populace. This is hinged on the fact that agriculture formed the core of the economic stability of Indians. These bias policies that were implemented culminated in the dispossession of thousands of individuals and whole families from their wholly owned estates and land. These policies affected sale laws against the treatment of defaulting landowners and the resumption of rent free holding. This inhuman act was further coupled by the direct assessment of heavy land ratesviii. The rates were structured in a manner that rendered them unaffordable by a significant number of the landowners. Thus, they were consequently evicted from their land. This was however just one was in which the British sought to undermine the Indian economy. The British authority also instituted policies that had a direct, negative, impact on the imports and exports of India and subsequently the economy. British manufactured commodities glutted the Indian market thus undermining the market for Indian manufactured commodities from the cottage and craft industries. The rebellion was by all respect a success. On its culmination, a new attitude towards the Indian culture was adopted. The British now decided not to interfere with the Indian culture. The traditional practises that were once treated with contempt were now given due respect. Prior to the mutiny, the British gave the Indian princes little, if any, respectix. They undervalued their role in the Indian society. However, after the mutiny, the British gave the princes and other relevant authority the respect they deserved. This transition was fashioned in the accepting of participation of the princes and other individuals of authority in the legislative council. The British had now come to the realization that the hostile feelings being generated towards them would be detrimental to their occupancy of Indiax. As such, they sought to recruit the princes and landowners in an endeavour to maintain a positive relationship between the British and the Indian peasantryxi. In order to reward their efforts, the princes and landowners were promised property and other forms of rewards for their allegiance. However, this plan did not yield the expected results. This is sourced from the fact that due to their allegiance to the British rule, the landowners started experiencing a rift between them and the working peasants. Thus, this plan was ineffectual in the long term view. Conclusion The manner in which the British authority treated the Indians is the source of all hostility that faced their rule. Their resentment of Indians culminated in the revolution. The Indians reacted with hostility, contempt and viewed the British rule as a danger to the continued existence of their culture. The British rule started out based on mutual respect. This culminated in the taking of Indian wives by the British population. This then transformed into relationship disdain by the British. This led to the most atrocious acts by the British on the Indian populace. However, this phase ushered in a new phase of mutual respect whereby the British government under her majesty became cognizant of the rights and culture of the Indians. Notes Read More