The Oslo Accords of the 1990s promised to bring an end to the conflicts over control of Palestine. Just when the world thought the tensions were about to be contained and a bi-lateral agreement would ensure that Israel and Palestine would co-exist peacefully and side-by-side, the violence started up all over again…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Why did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s fail to deliver the promise of a just and lasting peace between Israel and the Pales"
Download file to see previous pages
Scholars and academics have dissected the facts and circumstances and attempted to discover the reasons for the failure of the Oslo Accords. Two dominant themes were identified in the literature. One theme demonstrates a tendency to blame the internal political contestations between the PLO and Hamas as the culprit. The other them is Israeli-related and points to Israel’s ambitions to enlarge and normalize its occupation of Palestine. This research study analyzes both themes and concludes that is was a combination of both Israeli political ambitions and internal political contestation. The 21st century remains haunted by a number of long and unresolved conflicts, none more turbulent than the Israeli-Arab conflict (Kittrie, 2003). Long-standing uncertainties about Palestine’s state status are juxtaposed against Israel’s determination to secure its borders in an increasingly hostile and contentious region. Yet in1993, the on-going conflict that appeared to be on its final legs as it appeared Palestine and Israel had agreed to a peace settlement also known as the Oslo accords (Sayigh, 2002). However, by 2000, the conflict intensified and the need for a solution is more important than ever before. Instability in the region threatens peace in the Middle East and the rest of the world. Thus by identifying the reasons for the failure of the Oslo accords during the 1990s can help us to identify what went wrong for the construction of a new and more realistic intervention scheme. Scholars and academics have conducted significant research into the causes of the Oslo accord failure. Findings are varied although two main themes have been identified in the literature. One theme demonstrates a tendency to attribute the Oslo peace failure to internal political contestation with Palestine. The other theme tends to shift blame for the Oslo peace failure to Israel’s behaviour and sense of entitlement. The arguments in the literature that will be examined in this research study are therefore divided into two main categories: Palestinian-Related Factors and Israeli-Related Factors. Palestinian-Related Factors Using the theory of internal political contestation, Pearlman (2008/09) argues that the Oslo Peace Conference failed because, internal conflicts over contested leadership in Palestine led to violence and disruptions specifically calculated to spoil the peace negotiation process (p.80). Similar arguments are made by Shikaki (2002) who argue that internal political conflict over perceived failure by the Palestinian Liberation Army (PLO) and its failure to secure an independent Palestine is the catalyst for the failed Oslo accords of the 1990s. Indyk (2003) likewise attributes the failed Oslo peace settlement of the 1990s to internal conflicts and places the blame on insurgencies and terrorism and poor government institutions in Palestinian territories. Kydd and Walter (2002) use a game theory model to demonstrate that extremism and a lack of confidence within Palestine which led to the deliberate “
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Why did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s fail to deliver the Dissertation”, n.d.)
Why did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s fail to deliver the Dissertation. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1471924-why-did-the-oslo-peace-process-of-the
(Why Did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s Fail to Deliver the Dissertation)
Why Did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s Fail to Deliver the Dissertation. https://studentshare.org/history/1471924-why-did-the-oslo-peace-process-of-the.
“Why Did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s Fail to Deliver the Dissertation”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1471924-why-did-the-oslo-peace-process-of-the.
Reasons Why The Oslo Peace Process Of The 1990s Failed To Deliver The Promise Of A Just And Lasting Peace Between Israel And The Palestinians. Some years ago, there was a sensation that the Israel –Palestine conflict would end. The expectation had been elicited by the signing of the Oslo Accord.
The research used quantitative methods of data collection and analysis and used a survey method of data collection. It involved 50 employees in the survey, five each from the ten selected stores. The stores and the employees were selected using judgemental convenience sampling method.
These are; the legitimate rights of the other, which has been denied for long periods; advocacy for self-legitimacy that has been the main struggle by the two fronts; the international legitimacy that historically has been divided between Muslim and Christian countries.
Why Did the Oslo Peace Process Fail? The Oslo I Accord or simply Oslo I, which indicates the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of the Declaration of Principles (DOP), set in 1993, was an attempt to establish a framework which would seek the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Likewise, as clearly averred by Szmania (1989), “the emergence of alternative providers and the wholesale introduction of new services have given customers increased choices and flexibility to meet their long distance needs” (par. 1). The change occurred due to the erosion of barriers in monopolies in telecommunications networks that enabled new entrants to apply innovative technological services and equipment that enhanced communication and computer applications.
The above quote is indicative of the emergence of suicide as a social problem and the relevance of media portrayal of the subject. From the 1990s and extending into the new millennium, male suicide in the UK (England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland) has grown significantly and this M1 project will explore the emergence of suicide from the confines of the private sector into a social issue.
Educators, policy makers and researchers have consistently tied the achievement gap to the student dropout rate (Ladson-Billings, 2006). As a result, educators, parents, employers and policy makers have expressed concerned over the persistent high drop-out rate particularly among high school students (Burris & Welner, 2005).
The decision that the managers of the firms take has in the past raised questions on how their analysis are able to beat the market consistently. To out perform the market returns, the manager is expected to demonstrate the ability to make correct market timing and market selection.
This paper is an analysis of the Syria’s position on peace with Israel and the changes that occurred during the years of the peace process and how Syria adjusted its foreign policy to suit these changes. Among such changes will be the disintegration of the Russian led communist Bloc and the Gulf War of 1991.
It comprises of detailed strengths and weaknesses of the risk management planning process (John, Chris, Paul, and Karl, 2004, 13-14). It also includes how the group overcame difficulties while coming up with the risk management planning process and finally a deep evaluation of the risk management planning process of Chesapeake Energy.
5 Pages(1250 words)Dissertation
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the dissertation on your topic
"Why did the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s fail to deliver the promise of a just and lasting peace between Israel and the Pales"
with a personal 20% discount.