Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1470589-human-rights-answer-question
https://studentshare.org/history/1470589-human-rights-answer-question.
Bartolome presented a case that was meant to convince the Spanish authorities to permit him to try saving the remaining few Caribbean natives. This was achieved by an attempt to take them out of slavery and put them in sovereign towns (McGowen 260). Bartolome was greatly convinced that the slaughter and enslavement of the native populace was not only seen as a crime as defined by the church, but it was also a mortal sin. He often accompanied Ovando the Governor in his military trips and on one the trips he witnessed how the poor natives were being massacred.
He also saw the appalling conditions the natives were kept. Bartolome asked for and managed to be given a section of Venezuelan main land for experiment which he wanted to demonstrated his believe on the issue that he was capable to appease the natives using religion and not weapons as it was the believe of Spanish (Sen 450) Question 2: Broader Implications of this finding Over many decades Bartolome incessantly propagated an ideological ground that Indians held the right to their land and that the papal funding to Spain were meant for the soul conversion and not allocation of resources.
Rising into a politically perceptive activist, Bartolome was in a position to influence a positive change including indemnifying the diplomatic entry into Guatemala by the Dominican Friars. He was thereafter, in 1544 named as Chiapas Bishop in Guatemala to be able to enforce the Emperor Charles New Laws that outlawed slavery and restricted the Indian ownership to a single generation (McGowen 265). This resulted to settlers objecting to the limits put in place and refused to follow the lead of the new Bishop.
Casas was later forced to return to Spain because of his resistance to new laws by encomenderos and the conflict he faced with the Spanish settlers due to his pro Indian strategies and his activists religious positions. The work of Bartolome has been greatly uploaded by the advocates of human rights. He spent much of his remaining time in the Spanish courts where he had an enormous pressure over the Indians associated concerns. Bartolome took part in Valladolid debate where Juan Gines argued that Indians were less compared to human and therefore, needed the Spanish masters in order to make them civilized.
On the other hand, Bartolome maintained his stand that Indies were completely human and that vanquishing them forcefully was unjustifiable. Casas was in the front line championing the Mexico and the Central American Indians, disagreeing with a held belief that Indians were beast the reason as to why they were enslaved. In his defense for the native Indian people, he held far-reaching implications for the strategies taken on by both the church and the Spanish Crown towards the state of slavery.
This cautiously, but in an emotional manner changed the defense addresses concerns that included relationships between the differing cultures and races, the perception of colonialism and the notion of a just war (Sen 455). Question 3 Arendt was an academic Jewish who had fled from Germany to France and arrived in States in 1941 accompanied by his husband and her mother with illegal visas that they were given by Hiram, a US diplomat. Making an assumption of a society such as Germany’s Weimar republic , the united states or the France third
...Download file to see next pages Read More