Revolutionary War-Cowpens - Essay Example

He states that all the battles fought by then were done with the help of troops and men who participated in the regiments and had a certain commander who used to gather the entire men together and prepare them for all sorts of catastrophes. Soon these men who belonged to the frontier got the status of 'The Corps of Rangers'. These companies of rangers belonged to various parts of the state such as Virginia, Maryland or Pennsylvania who were under the leadership Colonel Daniel Morgan. Through his ongoing efforts the rangers got the status of the most eminent corps of the continental army.

They were not precisely Rangers but were high level marksmen and according to some British general they were corps f a crack shot. These riflemen of Morgan stood victorious and were able to secure an amazing victory against the British during the Battle of Cowpens in 1781. The level of achievement can be evaluated by the fact that 1100 British soldiers attacked them and they were able to kill 110, capture 830 of them only lost 12 men who were killed during the entire process and 63 were badly wounded.

Another successful regiment was of Thomas Knowlton, a brave young soldier who led an army from Connecticut which was quite successful in gaining the vital information of the mission. Only less than 150 men were part of his troop but his campaign was quite successful too. In this book the author has in detailed studied the Battle of Cowpens and according to him all men irrespective of cast, creed or culture were recruited in the regiments having their leader that is general or officials who managed and empowered them.

How have artist portrayed the Battle of Cowpens in the paintings? None of the paintings that have been attached for review are able to completely depict, justify and narrate what actually happened during the battle. According to me the first painting is the closest to the real scenario that happened during the Battle of Cowpens in 1781. In this painting the defeat of the British is seen and how badly they were devastated during the battle. Many of their soldiers were killed and on the other side that is American soldiers were in power and had completely overtaken the British soldiers.

Personally I think that these paintings are quite biased and only reflect the artists view and how he actually perceived the entire situation. They have features which narrate that the artist was only interest to reflect his perspective and only executed what his preferences were. They were also only focusing on how the movements related to art were flourishing and did not do anything to contradict them without using their own brains and evaluating the truth. A lot of time was spent on propagating the art movements and the art which was being carried forward during that time.

They did not do anything to change the prevailing situation through their art but just went with the flow. Research was not done properly because if the research was accurate and more precise then the painting would not have been as bias as they are at the moment. References 75th Rangers (Bryant, Russ, and Susan Bryant. 2005. 75th Rangers. St. Paul, MN: MBI Pub Sealed with blood: war, sacrifice, and memory inRevolutionary (Purcell, Sarah J. 2002. Sealed with blood war, sacrifice, a