The Unconscionable Conduct Applied by the Colonists - Essay Example

The unconscionable conduct applied by the colonists for the duration of the majestic epoch was strappingly disreputable and brought incessant disagreement between the colonists and the Indians. Fascinatingly, there were assorted reactions of conflicts and corporations throughout the era due to colonists’ ravenousness for supremacy and territory and the experience of other colonists such as the Spaniards. What was expected to be cordiality turned out to be the most horrible thing the Indians had ever hoped for. The entrance of settlers later dictated their culture, and lifestyle and deeply condensed their population. Can your enemy be too powerful to influence your life? It was war and disagreement. This article explains the happenings during the colonial era and the changes brought by the events.

Initially, the Indians were very hospitable to the settlers since they thought that they just wanted to do business and treated them as nice people. The indigenous traded greatly with the colonists. The Indians obtained several goods such as knives, fishhooks, and weapons as they trapped fur in exchange with the English. Colonists expected gold and silver, which did not exist, hence were forced to work to sustain themselves. The settlers opted to depend on the Indian populace because they never succeeded in hitting upon gold and silver. The English then twisted their aspirations to continue to create and make bigger their settlement. The spreading out of the colony by the colonists ignited a row between the English and the Indians. As a result, the battle for dominance was initiated. Owning resources and land was the utmost basis of the perpetual war between the Native Americans and the settlers (Oberg 90-93).
Colonists’ had a frame of mind that they were superior to the natives and that the natives were uncivilized for the reason that they had backward beliefs such as a woman owning land and other forms of property. The English behaviors towards the Native Americans were antagonistic and bigoted. The Indians only used the soil but never had possession of it. Furthermore, there were scores of diseases that were deemed to have been brought by the white settlers that enormously killed the Native Americans thus weakening and reducing their numbers. The Indians did not have the military power to fight back the unified opponents (Oberg 92-95).
The irreconcilable and interminable disagreements between the natives and the colonists led to wars and displacements among the Indians. Even though the Native Americans benefited more from the settlers, pain for their land, which was seized by the English, lingered in their heads. The Indians had problems with hunger or going to war especially due to the conflict among them. The Indian tribes then resolved to keep peace with one another and formed a council that would deal with the tribal issues. The natives abandoned their inferior culture and imitated the colonists’ cultures, which perhaps, they deemed superior (Oberg 94-95).
Amongst all the American colonies, Spain appeared to be for the most part brutal, opportunistic, and undoubtedly destructive. However, the Spaniards also received a repulsive attack from the natives, which led to a mass murder that placated the region. They achieved their assignment by using both the land and free labor provided by the Indians. English and French were friendlier compared to the Spaniards. The Native Americans decided to accommodate the English settlers because they could not fight them. The English had superior and very sophisticated weapons rendering them unbeaten over the natives. However, the indigenous did not understand the French language and hence would only node in approval, The French then legitimized colonialism by bringing handouts and pomp to the natives. The natives unknowingly did not understand all these happenings and thus assumed that French settlers were just original and funny-looking people. The French even went ahead to organize authority and control ceremonies but the Indians would not understand all the events (Oberg 100-101).
Generally, the indigenous were upset since they could not comfortably live and enjoy their culture and freedom. Part of the natives’ fertile land had been either grabbed or bought by the white settlers. Most natives collaborated with the settlers because they later profoundly depended on their goods such as swords and arrowheads. Trepidation and mistrust contributed to the collaboration and assimilation of the white settlers. Read More