Name Date Course Section/# 2012 Election: Overview, Recap, and Analysis of the Changes Effected on the House, Senate, and Presidency As with any election, the shift in power that was experienced during the last round of elections that also coincided with the US Presidential election lays the framework for the means by which key policy decisions, actions, and approaches to certain issues will be formulated…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Implications of the 2012 US elections for the policy making bodies in the US federal government"
Download file to see previous pages
Furthermore, the analysis will seek to at least minimally explain to what extent the election results have impressed upon the shareholders (inclusive of the President and legislators) of the need to either seek compromise or push single-mindedly towards a highly partisan solution to each and every issue that may face them in the coming years leading up to the next election. As a means to understand this, the key changes that have been effected before and after the November 2012 election will be analyzed. Due to the intrinsically liked nature of the way that the Electoral College and the popular vote within a given state or region is linked, the two have a way of tracking with one another; albeit representing two somewhat different variants (Brown 419). For instance, the 2012 presidential election saw Mr. Romney accrue around 47% of the popular vote and carry 23 states whereas President Obama obtained 51% of the vote and carried 27 states. This of course translated to a victory for President Obama and the subsequent plurality of Electoral College votes that propelled him to re-election. Naturally, as compared to the two other forms of election results which will herein be discussed, the election for president does not have the same level of nuance. For instance, the overall total number of states won is not important; overall victory of course is. Unlike the Senate or the House of Representatives where an increasing number of seats gives another party a proportionate increase in the power it yields within such a chamber, the victory of the president is less nuanced. In this way, the overall nature of whether the president won in a landslide or won election by a very small margin matters little for the direction that the given president might chose to pursue policy goals and implementation within his term. Of course this is not to say that a first term president will not be mindful of the extent to which he experiences broad based support; quite the contrary. Rather, it is merely meant to serve as an indication that the presidential election is a much different type of election than those which take place to make up the two houses of legislature. With respect to the Senate, a great deal of change was not incorporated as a result of the election results of 2012. For instance, the 2012 elections incrementally bettered the Democratic position in the Senate by increasing their majority by two seats (53 as compared to 51 previously), it did not provide a fundamental shift in power such as would allow either party to approach issues from a primarily different method of action. Conversely, the result of the US House of Representatives was somewhat different than the result that has thus far been discussed in the Senate. Compared to the last election, the Republicans lost 8 seats to settle at 234 whereas the Democrats of course picked up these 8 seats to settle their total at 201. This of course combined to ensure that the Republican party still maintained a majority within the House; however, it is of course not a super majority or one that can be used in concert with the Democratically controlled Senate to affect any real level of partisan goals. With respect to the overall policy implications that the aforementioned situation is likely to entail, it will necessarily be a divergence from
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Implications of the 2012 US elections for the policy making bodies in Essay”, n.d.)
Implications of the 2012 US elections for the policy making bodies in Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1465456-implications-of-the
(Implications of the 2012 US Elections for the Policy Making Bodies in Essay)
Implications of the 2012 US Elections for the Policy Making Bodies in Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1465456-implications-of-the.
“Implications of the 2012 US Elections for the Policy Making Bodies in Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1465456-implications-of-the.
US Government and Terrorism
Most people agree with the claim that terrorism is a different kind of offence. So, the way terrorists should be dealt with is a bone of contention among the thinkers today. Many of them claim theoretically that military courts are better at dealing with terrorism whereas others believe that civil courts are not so naive as critics claim.
The developments have offered banks a unique, central responsibility in the US financial environments. These roles include lending and deposit taking and other activities in the financial services sector. Banks control the bigger proportion of the deposits that are transferable as checks (Spong, 2000).
The policies in the United States engulf all functions that are often undertaken by the federal government. It is the primary function of the executive branch to ensure that all the policies of the land are enacted. However, the United States’ policies are segmented and driven from collective laws, legal proceedings, and executive decisions (Coleman 62).
That would increase the amount of cash to federal coffers. The House bill called the American Clean Energy and Security Act, intents to control greenhouse gases emission, which trap heat in the atmosphere. The
From a critical perspective, the essay will briefly explain the bill and describe its significance in Ohio. Furthermore, the essay will also provide discussion regarding eventual fate of the bill by demonstrating arguments
ICC was formed in 2002 following the ratification of the agreement made by approximately 60 countries. It has its headquarters in The Hague and Netherlands and acts as a last resort in prosecuting heinous offenses where national
ories of ordinary people, fired with passion and self-belief, who attained extra-ordinary results through the process of law and who used public platforms to espouse policies affecting the common man, and who, through their contribution, made significant inroads in the “arena
t actions that are affiliated to some worthy purpose and are goal oriented, which are taken by the US government to deal with and tackle societal problems. Public policies formulated by the government may pertain to fiscal, legal, societal, monetary or other such important
or as lobbying in the US government is concerned, the primary goal of the lobbyists is to engage in close interaction and discussion with the congressmen. The lobbyists try to explain to the congressmen in a detailed and precise manner the technical and logical reasons behind
The author states that the concept of democracy dates back to Aristotle’s era. He was the first Greek philosopher to explore this concept. Later, Christian thinkers related democracy with the worship of God, that all human beings are equal before God. The American Revolution was first to introduce components of liberal democracy.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Implications of the 2012 US elections for the policy making bodies in the US federal government"
with a personal 20% discount.