This paper "How Civil War resolved slavery issue" seeks to discuss how the Civil War resolved the slavery issue; and the difference between the slave perspective we have been traditionally taught and that of Celia. …
Download file to see previous pages...
The political power of planter prevented the nation unification under central government with capability of implementing an economic policy that was intended to stimulate industrial development. And even though slavery generated massive power and wealth for the planters, it never led to a similar substantial commercial and industrial growth as was witnessed in the free states. Hence, slavery became a fetter on the industrial capitalism development in the United States. This paper seeks to discuss how the Civil War resolved the slavery issue; and the difference between the slave perspective we have been traditionally taught and that of Celia.
The destruction of slavery through Civil War vastly accelerated development of the industrial capitalism. According to Kral (1995), the Civil War was organized and led by Lincoln as a revolution element. This war was characterized by the general strikes among the slaves and their involvement as soldiers, helpers, and spies actively in the Union army. The blacks also made a decisive contribution in building up a movement of mass revolution that led the Civil War. Many of the black activists who were refugees in the South also initiated the abolitionist movement and maintained it during the 1830s and 1840s dark days. They guided it ultimately to the point where it gained popular influence significantly in the 1850s. Antislavery activists also stimulated and exacerbated powerfully the tensions between the South and North, and assisted in providing ideological standard to unite the forces that were struggling against slavery (Kral 200). After the shots of the Civil War, 150 years later, important lessons are learned. The perspectives that we have been traditionally taught on the extent to which white supremacy and racism permeated the society of America from its inception. This marked the end of slavery. Celia, a slave's more local, regional, global perspective differs from the perspective that we have been traditionally taught. Celia, a slave was in the perspective of an isolated incident that indicated common fear of slavery in the period of antebellum in the United States. The perspective of Celia on slavery is that of the struggle of young slave women through the undeserved hardships of injustice and rape. The Celia’s story illustrates the root cause of the racism problems that America is still facing in their society today (McLaurin 97). Celia perceives slavery as racial discrimination where the white males dominate the culture which looks down upon the African Americans, with females being the most oppressed. Celia looks at views of slavery times and the values that still could pierce the daily lives of people in the United Sates as McLaurin (1991) illustrates. Slavery as we are traditionally taught developed in America less than one generation after Jamestown was founded in 1607. According to Kral (1995), slavery spanned long due to the discovery of the possibility of making, from the cultivation of tobacco, a fortune, which was a product with large market in the European countries. Tobacco plantation needed disciplined and intensive labor, and not many colonists were ready to work for other people (Willis 76). Therefore the labor challenges and shortages led to slavery. In summary, the paper has discussed how the Civil War resolved the issue of Slavery. According to Willis (1979), the origin of American Civil War can be traced from the bourgeois revolution. Slavery became a
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This research aims to evaluate and present the importance of slavery within the history of the United States and its prevalence, it is important to understand the factors that lead to the development of slavery within the United States and its dismantling. Slavery was prevalent in Britain at the time that the first United States colonies were formed
She is quite hopeful to put her faith in humanity’s ability (which is verily energized by Christianity) to win over the tyrannous evil of slavery. But as outsider in the American society, Tocqueville is more cautious to depict the minor races’ status in the White society.
According to the Foner (1969, p. 262), the Wilmot Proviso is the 8 August 1846 proposal of Pennsylvania’s Democratic Congressman David Wilmot that “slavery be excluded from any territory the nation acquired from Mexico” as a result of the Mexican-American War.
They were bought and sold repeatedly by their white masters who did not provide much for quality life. Blacks were accused of crimes, and they could not prove their innocence in courts since authorities only wanted to arrest and use their cheap labor. Southern states such as Alabama were deeply rooted into slavery, and it was generally accepted that the economy depended on slaves since most of the American exports came from slavery and cheap labor from the poor African Americans (Blackmon 6).
Being the 16th President of the USA, Abraham Lincoln’s leadership guided his country successfully through military, constitutional and moral crisis. He extensively opposed the idea of slavery in the U.S as manifested in his many campaigns and speeches. Chapter five topics: towards emancipation, clearly defines this event.
Abraham Lincoln referred to as the 16th chief executive of the United States of America who served between the years of March1861 to April1865 when he was assassinated. The assassination came a few days after the end of the American civil war, which is said to have achieved in preserving the union, while ending slavery, and promoting economic and financial modernization (Clayborne 21).
Abraham Lincoln was never an actual supporter of slavery and he made great efforts to abolish it especially in the western territories and new states. It was important to Lincoln that people recognized the dignity of labor by differentiating it from slavery (Johnson, 53).
The Northern industrial economy, fueled by cheap immigrant labor, differed greatly from the slavery-driven, agricultural economy f the South. In addition, the socially mobile northern culture maintained different moral beliefs than the South's caste system, the enforcer f the rigid roles f slaves and landed gentry.
tates, interpretations of the Constitution and particularly Slavery, the vast differences between North and South are evident, and the Civil War does seem to have been inevitable.
Essential to the causes of the American Civil War is the strong feelings Southern States had