Nobody downloaded yet

Exemplary of the kinds of arguments made by realist, liberal and critical theorists of International Politics - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In the 30th Olympic Games that were held in London, England in 2012, a lot of emphasis was paid on the security of the athletes and to ensure that everything went well without any disturbance. Different schools of thought have come up with different arguments in favor and against the large amount of money that is spent on the security of the participants in these Olympic Games which specifically includes the athletes…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Exemplary of the kinds of arguments made by realist, liberal and critical theorists of International Politics
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Exemplary of the kinds of arguments made by realist, liberal and critical theorists of International Politics"

Download file to see previous pages The liberal theorists believe that there should be equality for all, while critical theorists critically analyze the mechanisms determining international politics. The liberal theorists believe that the facilities and entertainment offered in the Olympic Games should be available and accessible to all the sections of the interested community. They believe that the fact that the organizing committee has reserved some features exclusively for the athletes and sponsors’ representatives only is unjust and should be available to local community as well. (Boykoff & Tomlinson, 2012) The liberals have argued the fact that since the inception of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in the 1890’s (known as some other association at that time) was formed as a body consisting of elites only which included lords and princes, and these were the people who would vote and decide the fate of the Olympics. This process then started to include more stakeholders in this decision making body but still only a select few that is the big businessmen who would control the commercial aspect of the games. Even today, the voting process is not completely impartial and the votes have been allegedly to be biased with the help of bribery and other benefits to nations who involve in such corruption. Other than this, the security measures taken to protect the Olympic Games involves huge costs which will have huge economic costs as well as psychological ones. The army soldiers deployed in London in areas near the Olympic venue even exceeds the number of British soldiers deployed in Afghanistan. This highlights the fact that the locals have not been treated as equals because the majority of these soldiers are deployed for the security of athletes and organizers’ representatives and not the locals. The realist theorists can present an argument to this according to their beliefs. The realists argue that the security of the nation and in this case, the security of London is much more important for the good of the nation than sending out more troops to Afghanistan. Sending more troops to Afghanistan will benefit the world overall by fighting the terrorists and keeping them at their home rather than letting them enter into their countries for terrorist attacks. On the other hand, the soldiers deployed in London for the security of the Olympic games is much more important to the nation as it has higher stakes attached to the credibility of England and London to host such a major and prestigious event. Since the reputation, injection of finances and tourists, and credibility of the nation and British government was attached to these games, it is only fitting that the security measures are taken for the good of the country itself. Since the realist theory believes that self-interest has to be the first priority, in this case the security of the nation is more important as self-interest has to take priority. (Dowling, 2012) The realists also argue that in case of an aerial strike with the help of a ground-to-air missile, there may be some damage caused to the residents living in the locality where the incident occurs. However, the damage caused by this will be collateral damage and one that cannot be avoided or rather should not be given the fact that this collateral damage will be much less compared ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Exemplary of the kinds of arguments made by realist, liberal and Essay”, n.d.)
Exemplary of the kinds of arguments made by realist, liberal and Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1460960-exemplary-of-the-kinds-of-arguments-made-by
(Exemplary of the Kinds of Arguments Made by Realist, Liberal and Essay)
Exemplary of the Kinds of Arguments Made by Realist, Liberal and Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1460960-exemplary-of-the-kinds-of-arguments-made-by.
“Exemplary of the Kinds of Arguments Made by Realist, Liberal and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1460960-exemplary-of-the-kinds-of-arguments-made-by.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Module: Contemporary Theories of World Politics. Topic: In what ways can a classical realist be critical of Waltz's neorealism
Introduced as early as 1948, classical realism came into being as a natural response when the proponents of this international relations theory, such as E.H. Carr, Hans Morgenthau, and Reinhold Niebuhr, came to recognize the failure of liberalism to maintain global peace during the World War II.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Compare and Contrast Liberal and Realist Views of International Law
The relationship between these countries addresses various needs that these countries must have. However, historians and other analysts believe that the needs that one country seeks to fulfill should not act in a manner, which intends to imprison its free will (Simpson, 2004: 14).
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Realist and Neo-Realist International Relations
Realism is the type of IR theory that interprets all aspect of international politics as reducible to a struggle for power, with the state seen as a unitary entity in control (more or less) of its destiny, the main actor but conditioned in its behaviour by the "international anarchy", the absence of government in interstate sphere that is regarded as the hallmark of international politics.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
What can critical theory tell us about international politics
Critical theoretical examination of the society and culture remains an important aspect especially in the current international affairs and politics. Therefore, the term critical theory has been widely applied in studying international politics. According to Philips (2000), critical theory is usually associated with the Frankfurt school from where works of influential theorists including Karl Marx and Jurgen Habermas continue making an important contribution to the study of critical theory in relation to international politics.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Provide arguments as to why the international system may not be as war-prone as realist/neorealist scholars would have us believe
tem in which governments makes decisions that are not based on the best interest of its citizens, but instead the interest of the state are the top priority. Since the realist / neorealist focus is on actions that benefits the state, battle and wars are activities that are
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Essay: President Bush's Arguments for Invading Iraq and the Realist Theory of International Relations
The state is considered as a separate rational entity which is supposed to operate in the insecurity and gung ho environment. The states politics based on the principles of realism are committed to the
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Critical Thinking Essay: President Bush's Arguments for Invading Iraq and the Realist Theory of International Relations
There would be no need to have armies or foreign policies. But evolution and history have proved otherwise and the world of today is comprised of hundreds of countries divided on race, ethnicity, religion, geography etc. This realistic scenario has been fundamental in
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
International Politics
For several decades, a concern in the discipline has been how to face the evident exclusions of the realist paradigm, including the functions of transnational as well as local-level players and of thoughts in international politics. Moreover,
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
World politics - essay Question is , - How do Realists and Structuralists conceptualize power in international relations Explain in reference to the following theorists: Morgenthau, Waltz and Wallerstein
Various theorists have come up with different explanations regarding the role and nature of power. The realists believe that states are sovereign and are directed by
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Give a critical assessment of the realist critique of liberalism int the study of international Relations
Typically, there are two international relation theories namely realism commonly referred to as political realism and liberalism or idealism. The two theories differ widely according to
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Exemplary of the kinds of arguments made by realist, liberal and critical theorists of International Politics for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us