Please provide the cover sheet given at Arts Central Exploring the Icebreaker Thesis: A Criticism of Suvorov’s Argument Introduction IceBreaker, a book written by Victor Suvorov, discusses one of the most controversial claims in world history: it was Stalin, not Hitler, who triggered the Second World War…
Download file to see previous pages...
But Victor Suvorov blatantly refuted this knowledge, claiming that Stalin was planning to launch an offensive against Nazi Germany, overrun Western Europe and establish communism in the region.1 Thus, the big question is who really started the Second World War? Is Suvorov’s IceBreaker thesis plausible? In this essay I argue that the IceBreaker thesis is flawed and questionable at best. Overview of the Icebreaker Thesis The interconnected issues of Hitler’s impetus and Stalin’s objective in 1941 became highly controversial due to the Icebreaker thesis of Suvorov. Suvorov claimed that Stalin had dreamed of a large-scale conflict between Western democracies and Germany, that he condoned the eventual accession of Hitler, and that he viewed the hostile approach of Nazi Germany toward Western democracies as the ‘icebreaker’ which would restore revolutionary sentiments all over Europe. Suvorov claims that Stalin planned to attack Nazi Germany in 1941, a move which he expected would expand all over Western Europe and strengthen the expansion of communism all over the region.2 To bolster his argument, Suvorov provides descriptions of a massive number of Soviet tanks and paratroopers. According to Suvorov, this wicked plan was thwarted simply because Nazi Germany detected the Soviet plan sooner and instigated their destructive defensive attack. This German assault was remarkably triumphant, Suvorov claims, for it was able to detect the Soviet plan ahead of time and hence successfully caught them off guard.3 Suvorov’s thesis was in fact originally introduced by Hitler. The declaration of war released by Nazi Germany condemned the alleged Soviet preparations to assault Germany and rationalized the Nazi attack on Soviet Russia as a defensive response. Several scholars may have been astonished by this effort to hold Moscow responsible for the eruption of a full-blown conflict between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia and several who would have accepted it as a fact. In any case, holding his victims responsible for motivating his assault had become Hitler’s modus operandi. For instance, he charged the Holocaust on a suspected global Jewish plot to annihilate the Aryan race.4 Hitler had habitually held his victims responsible to justify his campaigns against them. The Debate Suvorov’s thesis was largely ignored in England, although it received greater recognition in Russia because it demonstrated how Stalin overpowered an enraged and fanatical tyrant.5 Still, the thesis drew the attention of numerous historians. But most historians find the thesis weak and anecdotal. The IceBreaker thesis is in fact fictitious. It is based on incomplete and disconnected sets of evidence. When it is analysed against authentic documents that summarise the dishevelled and hopeless condition of the Red Army in 1941, the thesis becomes implausible. However, there are still those who find the thesis credible. For instance, the IceBreaker thesis is somewhat encouraging for German historians nowadays for it somehow vindicate Nazi Germany for attacking Soviet Russia and, consequently, setting alight the Second World War. This thesis has been embraced by several Russian and German historians who are eager to hold Stalin responsible for all the evil deeds that were perpetrated throughout the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Exploring the Icebreaker Thesis: A Criticism of Suvorov's Argument Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1457013-what-is-the-icebreaker-thesis-how-plausible-is-it
(Exploring the Icebreaker Thesis: A Criticism of Suvorov'S Argument Essay)
“Exploring the Icebreaker Thesis: A Criticism of Suvorov'S Argument Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1457013-what-is-the-icebreaker-thesis-how-plausible-is-it.
This bible analytical technique is common with liberal and mainstream Christian theologians to understand the passages in the bible. The study bases its foundation on pure reason rather than faith or revelation. Biblical criticism came into being in the 17th and 18th century due to the sweep of rationality at the time.
Xuding Wang claims “Kate Chopin explores feminine selfhood in a patriarchal society through the heroine’s spiritual journey to freedom in ‘The Story of an Hour.” (Wang 107) While arguing his position Wang very often says that Chopin’s protagonist Louise continually searches for her selfhood.
It currently is probable to get a nation where English learning is not a norm. While there are various persons who prefer not to learn the English language, the benefits of mastering and learning to communicate effectually in English goes beyond the national boundaries.
Immanuel Kant’s objections to the ontological argument in the “Critique of Pure Reason”, published in 1781, played an integral role in changing of thinking and philosophy. He was fascinated with the skeptical drawings that ensued from Hume’s premises.
This documentary film effectively portrayed how the students from Republic of China, India and United States spend their school days. 2 Million Minutes explores the different habits, attitudes, behaviors, lifestyles and ambitions of these students. The major argument of this essay is based on the education system of America. The documentary film also brings up the wonder if the students of United States work hard enough to score good marks in exam and grab the opportunity to get success in future career.
This is to unravel the relationship between the scientific concept of environment conservation and its deep roots into the religion. Christians will always be subjected to criticism from the environmental activists and scientists for their lack of concern for the environment and now when there is different approach of relation between the two, it is not easy for the people to believe or trust it.
Other women in the play possess “traditional” female characteristics, which Aristophanes not only disputes through the character of Lysistrata, Aristophanes holds up to scrutiny the necessary ideal of the feminine as powerless as
?? have implemented a number of measures calculated to restrain the behaviour of individuals.1 The United Nations Security council’s (UNSC) blacklisting and targeted sanctions is arguably, the most ‘visible and controversial’ of this evolving trend in international law.2
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Exploring the Icebreaker Thesis: A Criticism of Suvorov's Argument for FREE!