Iran hostage crisis is the notion given to the diplomatic crisis between Iran and United States in 1979, when 52 American citizens who were working as diplomats in the American Embassy in Tehran were held hostage for 444 days. The Iranian government of that time formed after the Iranian Revolution backed an effort made by Islamist armed students and militants to take over the embassy…
Download file to see previous pages...
Prior to the attacks, Bush’s administration was criticized for its international military policies. In the wake of the attacks however, a worldwide condemnation for terrorism was seen. And the war on terror raged over Afghanistan and over Iraq for years. It claimed many lives and caused the destruction of many communities and structures in Afghanistan and Iraq. As the war went on for years without much progress being gained in managing the terrorist issue, debates and rumblings on the war were slowly being expressed from various interest groups, countries, and organizations. And like another Vietnam War, the war on terror started to flounder and lose popular support. The terrorist attack in 2005 in London which was reportedly initiated by the Al Qaeda group was just one of the indications which pointed to the glaring truth that the War on Terrorism was not working. In 2004, the Bush Administration cancelled its publication of the yearly “Patterns of Global Terrorism” report which would have manifested that the terrorist attacks increased significantly from 175 in 2003 to 625 in 2004 (Gregory, 2005). Throughout the years, the War Party has been claiming that the War on Terrorism has successfully minimized the number of terrorist attacks throughout the globe; however, all other data seem to oppose this claim (Gregory, 2005). Other groups supporting the war on terror were also firm in their support for the war, even when Rumsfeld’s leaked report indicated the limitations of the US in fighting the war on terror. ...
International relations experts and political analyst see the whole crisis as a violation of international law by Iran but they also consider the policies adopted by President Carter a reason behind the crisis to prolong. The Iranian hostage crisis did not take place on its own; there is a long series of events associated with it. The incidents which lead to Iran Hostage Crisis can be traced in the US foreign policy towards Iran during the years before the Iranian revolution.1 Background Events United States administration had a strong alliance with the Shah of Iran and the CIA with the help of MI6 overthrew the democratically elected government of Iran in 1953 to restore Shah. Therefore, an anti-American sentiment was already present in the Iranian people. Moreover, United States continued to support Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran and failed to consider the deteriorating popularity of the Shah in Iran. Shah was involved in a number of human rights violations and his rule was called a brutally repressive regime by many human rights agencies. It was an evident fact that Shah was able to prolong his rule because of the unflinching support of the United States. That is why Iranians held United States equally responsible for the oppressive actions taken against them as the Shah. His visit to the United States in 1977 was considered as an effort by the Shah to suppress the increasing cries of revolution in the country and thousands of Iranians protested against his visit. The US administration completely ignored the Iranian demonstrations against the Shah, which further enraged the people.2 The efforts to overthrow Shah’s American backed regime gained intensity and his regime ended the next year with the Iranian Revolution. The President’s national
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“U.S. foreign policy: Iran Hostage Crisis Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1452431-us-foreign-policy-iran-hostage-crisis
(U.S. Foreign Policy: Iran Hostage Crisis Research Paper)
“U.S. Foreign Policy: Iran Hostage Crisis Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1452431-us-foreign-policy-iran-hostage-crisis.
It is crucial as a confidence-building measure. 2. The country can achieve more in its foreign policy by ensuring more cooperative states such as in the area of economic and security/defense. 3. Multilateral policies assume the mantle of legitimacy since they have international support, hence, strengthening foreign policy.
This expansion was also meant to empower its competition with the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union, countries which were, at that time, considered to be more influential and more financially stable nations than the US.
It is here that most Americans, if they are watching television, can get a view of the candidates at work and showing what their selling skills to the people of America are. Yet, a truly interested voter will take the time to investigate the issues and determine the truth of what each candidate says about these issues.
Additionally, the Islamic Republic shows open hostility towards key American allies in the region, i.e. Israel; The religious-political establishment of Iran, backed by the Revolutionary Guards’ high command, has repeatedly stated that would not hesitate to launch pre-emptive strikes on the country’s enemies if Iran’s national interests are endangered1; According to Israeli and Western government and intelligence sources, Iran runs a large, diverse and steadily expanding ballistic missile arsenal2, which includes missiles with a range of 2500 km such as Shahab-3b3.
eloped when the Muslim student followers planned for a short hold on the embassy, which slowly changed due to the support it received and also the delay in terms of U.S President Jimmy Cater’s failure to deliver an ultimatum to Iran. The failure of the President to be strong
This research project will examine the issue of education as a women’s rights violation in Islamic countries in general and the countries of Pakistan and Iran specifically. In the case of the right to education for all
In order to have power over national security, a nation requires fiscal, energy and environmental security, etc. The Security threats are not confined to arch rivals only, but to other states and non-state elements as well. The non-state actors comprised of narcotic
Because of strategic importance, Kuwait’s foreign policies are often watched with curiosity by the external political observers because if its strategic location in the middle east2. Even though a well-developed country economically,
vernment since 1953.1 The Iran Hostage Crisis began when the pro Ayatollah student broke into the US embassy in Iran and took about 66 people hostage. Thirteen hostages were later freed, bringing the number down to 53. Another hostage was later released in 1980 bringing the
The crisis was viewed by the western media to perceived as be a very huge blow on the side of to the US government, which had, over the years struggled to maintain strong ties with the Iranian government since 1953.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic U.S. foreign policy: Iran Hostage Crisis for FREE!