All the Shah's Men - Book Report/Review Example

It puts into perspective of what happened and what is presently happening in the Middle East. Kinzer believes that the chief cause of the Middle East terror is the U.S assisted unseating of Iranian chief Mossadegh. He resurrects this story of intrigue on grounds that one can easily link the September 11 to Iran’s Islamic revolution of 1979 to the Mossadegh affair, which restored the Shah’s power and thwarted communist designs. However, this is unfounded as it does not have enough supporting evidence.

Kinzer’s intention of writing this thrilling book was to bring into light the history of what transpired during the coup d’etat. Through the operation Ajax, he explains each actor’s motivations and provides a bow-by blow account of the operation. He aims to expose the real reasons for the revolt, and what the motifs of all those involved were, as well as what they aimed to achieve. He seems to claim that the CIA’s actions on that fateful time were the impetus for all later Middle East terrorism although this is hard to ascertain.

He contents that America’s self-serving unilateral action, in disregarding international law or territorial sovereignty. Kinzer is telling the story that lies behind the coup. He tackles the pioneer occurrence of U.S supported elimination of a public leader in the cold war, and a chief foundation of Iranian termination with America and its policies. Kinzer also puts into perspective, the American influence in other third world nationalisms that embrace the American ideologies, and how they relate with America, as well as how U.

S, treats nations, which have different opinions from the U.S. The story of Mossadegh’s overthrow forms the foundation of several challenges. The overthrow began earlier, almost a century, before its actual occurrence. At the time, Iran, which was under the Qajar, was facing various problems. While the previous Safavid reign had recognized Shi’ism as the state religion of Iran, and had stretched and integrated the country, the Qajars were more fascinated in lavishness than management. They as well found themselves in a compromising situation with both Britain and Russia.

Having finished the treasury and ran out of taxation options, the Qajars extended concessions to British interests. The British found the Iranian national bank, which was Briton found and run, as Baron Julius de Reuter was given short-lived dispensation manage all of Iran’s businesses, and the British were given tobacco concession. In 1951, when the Iranian parliament nationalized the expansive Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) after England denied amending the firm’s exploitative concession the Britons colonialism faced its final stand.

The Britons replied to the Iranian government request by a string of insensitive actions and with prideful stubbornness. There were heated differences between the two nations, which led to greater distress between not only Britain and Iran but the whole world. The Britons claimed that the Iranians were causing damages, which were to affect the world, making it much poorer and weak. However, Mossadegh, whom Kinzer considered a visionary and millenarian, had immense hatred to the British. Mossadegh told an American envoy that came to break the stalemate “you do not know how evil they are.

You do not know how they sully everything they touch” (Kinzer p.127). In resolving the standoff, the Truman