Nobody downloaded yet

Realism, Liberalism and Marxism - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This write up is an analytical paper focusing on the Realism, Liberalism and Marxism as the most important theories of international relations and every theory and ideology had a great impact in different era of time in the World history…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Realism, Liberalism and Marxism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Realism, Liberalism and Marxism"

Download file to see previous pages This research will begin with the statement that according to the theory of realism, self interest is the motivating force behind world politics and hence there exists a competition among various stake holders and parties in the global scenario for safeguarding their self interests. In a society based on the principles of realism, moral values, ideological concerns and social considerations have less importance, whereas the national interest and security of the nation is always given the prime importance. Realism presents a materialistic approach to the working of things and considers the material benefits the ultimate target of all kinds of political and social struggles. The theory of realism has given rise to various other theories of international relations, of which power politics is the most widely studied. Power politics derives its basic ideology from realism and extends the safeguarding of interests of the nation to promoting aggression against other nations. According to political realism, there are certain rules and laws which govern the political scenario in society and these laws are deeply rooted in the human nature. Therefore the understanding of laws of human nature is imperative for improving the society. Human nature is perhaps the most consistent trait humans have because it’s the same as it was in old civilizations and thus the theory of politics was developed in ancient times. The various aspects of realism are based on ascertainment of facts and their extensive analysis. A foreign policy based on the principles of realism is never ambiguous and is clear in the consequences and future scenario which it tends to create. Therefore the policies based on realism do not serve long term objectives. Realism defines interests in terms of power with no questions of moral qualities and cultural or traditional preferences; realism presents a very realistic picture of the global political scenario in which the nations and states which have power do not care about the morals and values set by other cultures or the international community as a whole, for them power struggle is the deciding factor in all situations. Therefore the nations should learn to protect their interests by becoming powerful or by siding with the ones who have the power because this is the only way of survival in the world. Realism gives very less importance to moral values and traditions because of the belief that actions are judged by their consequences, therefore an actions which is taken to safeguard the moral values is never justified in realism if it puts the national security at risk. Morals cannot be made a part of the realist theory or international relations because ‘moral values’ is an extensively relative term with different interpretations in different societies and cultures therefore religion, moral values, traditions and culture does not and should not have any sort of involvement in the political dealings of a statesman (Stremmel, 2004). The theory of realism traces its history back to ancient Chinese literature and hence it has influenced the global political scenario from the very beginning of human civilization. Sun Tzu, an ancient Chinese scholar in his book the Art of War used realism to defend various war strategies of that time. Greek historian Thucydides is considered as the father of the theory of realism and he for the first time came up with the concept that might is always right and moral and ethical grounds are never considered in war and international politics. Another ancient scholar who based his teachings and writings on the theory of realism is Chanakya, the teacher of the first emperor of united India, Chandragupta Maurya. It is believed that it was the influence of the teachings of Chanakya which motivated Chandragupta to conquer the various parts of subcontinent and form a powerful and united empire in India. The teachings of Chanakya were based on the concept of power politics and he always convinced Chandragupta that the only way of survival in this world is by seizing immense power and maintaining an aggressive stance against ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Realism, Liberalism and Marxism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1443708-critically-evaluate-realism-liberalism-and-marxism
(Realism, Liberalism and Marxism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/history/1443708-critically-evaluate-realism-liberalism-and-marxism.
“Realism, Liberalism and Marxism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1443708-critically-evaluate-realism-liberalism-and-marxism.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
International Relations: Realism and Liberalism
...?WHY DO LIBERAL THEORISTS CLAIM THAT REALISTS HAVE COMPLETELY ‘OVERLOOKED’ THE SPREAD OF ‘LIBERAL PEACE’ IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS? Tutor: Date: Introduction International relations theory has been dominated by the realism because during the World War II liberalism was replaced being a paradigm. With time, liberals restructured their surfaces since they witnessed the state being challenged and they were sure the realists were not ale to account for anything that was going to happen. Since then there has been misunderstanding between the two paradigms. In order to better understand the two paradigms, differentiating the two will not have solved the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Realism, Liberalism, and the English School
...Realism, Liberalism, and the English School I. Introduction International foreign policy is historically viewed as being based on two competing theories of application. The school of Realism views the State as a unified actor created through the centralization of power and monopoly of legitimate use of force that it possesses within its sovereign territories, including economic, military, social, and ideological factors in application. The school of Realism can be dated primarily to the Italian philosopher Machiavelli, who counseled for a ruthless use of power to secure the goals and aims of a sovereign or politician. The Realist school makes it clear that States are...
6 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
How do the three conceptions of the international political economy (Realism, Liberalism, Marxism) differ How would the advocates of each assess the phenomenon of global integration What are the merits and the dangers of hegemonic stability in int
...which attempted to develop the association between the domestic and international aspects (Frieden & Martin, pp.118-125). International relations have been found to involve three different approaches or concepts that are the main focus of the current study and include Realism, Liberalism and Marxism. The realists consider war to be the central issue in the international relations that is expected to be a natural phenomenon. The liberal viewpoint is based on the individual factors of a nation and focuses on modernization in the use of technology, thus challenging the earlier orthodox views. Similarly Marx also gave his views on the international relations of a nation. The...
12 Pages(3000 words)Term Paper
Liberalism and Realism - International Relations
...8 November Liberalism vs Realism Realism and Liberalism are two sides of the same coin. The paper shall compare and analyse the differencebetween realism and liberalism. In the first part of the paper we shall define and understand realism and in the second part we shall define and understand liberalism and then strike a contrast between them. Realism: “When realists observe the world system, they primarily see states struggling for power, each trying to consolidate its relative gain in a zero-sum game. The structure of the international system is thus rooted in this struggle, which is...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Is a global state possible or even desirable Make full use of the theoretical and empirical literature in your answer. (with reference to theories of realism, communism, liberalism and marxism)
...and police will not be important since these features majorly to impose rules which benefit the leading classes. However, there will still be a requirement for bureaucracy to look after planning and organization38. Marxism-Leninism is the combination and outline of the historic exposures of the revolutionary attempts of oppressed and working individuals against imperialism and capitalism for over 160 years39. Moreover, it is a tool to utilize by oppressed and working individuals in their attempts for liberation, unrestraint and the creation of a novel world. According to  Lovell (1984), Marxism-Leninism has not been considered as a doctrine however it is a guide for implementing action....
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay
Is a global state possible or even desirable Answer the question with references to the concepts of realism, liberalism, marxism. In addition to theoretical literature, your answer should also include empirical evidence
...be assumed that the world is moving in between realism and liberalism when it comes to managing international relations5. The development of nasty nuclear weapons is known to delay the inevitable of Third World War but in the meantime, the nations are attempting to take each other down by playing economic games6. The trend of outsourcing is just another way of fulfilling capitalistic goal of making more money and it is literally shameful to observe the presentation of outsourcing as the greatest evidence in the support of the belief that nationalism has died out while, whole humanity is moving in the direction of becoming one nation in the current times and the era of Global Citizenship is just around...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay
Liberalism and Realism
...Liberalism and Realism A paradigmatic approach to international relations refers to the view of the world. The worldview includes agreement such as on what the basic needs are and an explanation to the core problems. It also seeks the appropriate theory to give an explanation. Although other scientists argue paradigms in definite terms, political scientists feel that everyone has a different view about the international system as much as it concerns the physical world (Shimko 331-332). All paradigms try to achieve all but the same thing. The paradigms are in efforts to provide a straightforward map of reality. They take all the complexities of the real world and reduce them to a central set of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Idealism, Realism, Marxism and Neo-Realism Theories
...Idealism, Realism, Marxism and Neo-Realism Theories s and non s cooperate and compete on various political issues. The international decisions are based partly on politics and are made by individual or collective states. Liberalism theory proposes a concept of liberal pacifism. The concept of liberalism is anchored on individual freedom, private property ownership, equality of opportunity and political participation for all states institution. The principles would give rise to liberal institutions that can thrive on an international platform. The theory also proposes an integration of capitalism and democracy to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Realism and liberalism
...Realism and liberalism Realism is a perspective whose domination is mostly by cynics, perhaps exemplified best in the tenants of pragmatism and morality. Realists place states in a position of having to observe the action of neighbors closely to effectively trying to resolve problems without regard to the moral concerns. Realists believe that the creep of morality into the international relations handicaps in a way that they fail to cope with the new conditions. Realisms, believing it does in the political laws must also believe in the possibility of creating rational theory that helps in reflecting objective laws. They also believe in the possibility of distinguishing...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Classical Realism, Neo Liberalism and Constructivism
...The strengths and weaknesses ical Realism, Neo Liberalism and Constructivism Introduction and ThesisThe theory of international relations entails a course of varied lines of thought explaining the context and processes in which international systems work. The course of each of the theories is evidently backed with evidence accordingly. In this evaluation, the desertion evaluates the theories of classical realism, neoliberalism and constructivism in relation to the international relations, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, the facilitation concludes in defining the most significant of the three theories. Classical Realism Two Strengths: ...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Realism, Liberalism and Marxism for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us