Global War on Terror - Assignment Example

The refusal of the world’s foremost nuclear superpower to join the moratorium on nuclear testing sent a strong signal to would-be nuclear powers: if the US reserved the right to test these weapons, why shouldn’t others? (Spanier and Hook, 2007) US also refused to sign Ottawa convention calling for a worldwide ban on land mines, whose primary victims were in war-torn developing countries. Retreat from multilateral became even worse when the republican George Bush became president in 2001. He was not ready to mend fences with the international community.

Instead of working through formal organizations such as UN ornate, US form coalition of willing on case by case basis and dismantle them when the mission is accomplished. Bush withdraws from Antiballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) despite protest by Russian leaders and warning by strategic analysts of a new global arms race. His dismissal of the Kyoto Protocol and failure to propose a more rigorous alternative despite earlier pledges to do so incited widespread criticism from abroad. This lead UN Human Rights Commission to deny US a seat on the panel on may 2001 for the first time (Spanier and Hook, 2007).

In my opinion, these policies are not appropriate. They are hindrance to US war on terror. The policy is not appropriate since the war on terror should be a corporate responsibility of all of the international organizations and therefore it requires their good will. QUESTION TWO Describe the concept of “asymmetric warfare” (p. 280). In what ways should the War on Terror be considered an asymmetric conflict? (Be specific.) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the US and its opponents in the War on Terror?

Asymmetric warfare is described as a conflict deviating from the norm, or an indirect approach to affect a counter-balancing of force. The disadvantaged power must push its unique advantages or successfully exploit particular weaknesses of the enemy in order to have any anticipation of prevailing. War on terror is consider asymmetric conflict because the terrorist advocates for followers using terrorist technique to retain support in home country and to win over the people occupying it in order to stop the principal support base partisans.

Advantages It enables the USA in getting support from other countries. Help USA of being not accused against committing war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. USA was only too pleased to be able to tell the world that it was helping the freedom loving people of Afghanistan (Huntington, 1993). Disadvantages Terrorist organizations have used asymmetric warfare concepts mainly when setting up operations against Western supremacy forces. Terrorist make use of local tribal forces in attacking civilian populations and devastate food supply infrastructure in order to make a humanitarian aid catastrophe which would sluggish Western coalition forces (Huntington, 1993).

QUESTION THREE Describe the Bush Doctrine's grand strategy of primacy and preemption. To what extent is this strategy new? In your opinion, is this the correct course for the US at this time? Explain. Bush message upon taking office in 2001 was that US would be concern primarily with its own interests and would go it alone to secure this interest whenever necessary. Bush claims that he is fighting against terrorism globally. His strategy which amount to Bush