After World War II, there was a concerted effort by the West to create an illusion that there was going to be independence in the Arab region. This is according to the populations that inhabit those lands today (Heper & Israeli 5). …
Download file to see previous pages...
This is not a situation that people and nations are likely to outgrow in the foreseeable future – perhaps not ever (Andersen, Seibert and Wagner). The end product of this mistrust that has grown over time has been the hostility leading from suspicion against the West. The reaction of the populations of the Middle East should however not be thought to always be at a consensus; far from it. There has been support by some regimes for the West which includes the United States seen as the “heir of the British imperialism” (Richman 3). The united states has been involved in the political situation in the Middle East since World War II in order to ensure that the oil rich fields stay within friendly arms and also in a bid to fending off competition especially from the then soviet union. It is this interests that have amassed a story of triumph and tragedy for the US in that region. The relationship with Iraq was born out of the desire to reign on the threat posed by Iran and this underwent a metamorphosis into a relationship jointly between Iran, Syria and the United States against Iraq in recent years. The action of President Bush to intervene in the Persian Gulf War with the aim of restoring the feudal monarch of Kuwait, which he viewed as the legitimate one, was not an abrupt decision. It had been the culmination of US foreign policy in the region for a long time that had spun for many administrations. It was as a deterioration of the relationship between the US and Iraq, which had started as far back as during the Baghdad pact that was aimed at making Iraq the capital of NATO which was a strategy against the soviets. The then government was overthrown by Abd al-Karim Qasim who accused it of being pro-Western. Qasim led the country from 1958 to 1963 when he was driven out in a coup by Abd al-Salam Arif who was said to have received help from the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Earlier, in an attempt to overthrow Qasim, Saddam Hussein had been involved in a failed coup in 1959, however, with the help of the CIA which had been accused of being his sympathizer, he overthrew the government of Arif in 1968 (Battle 2). This proves that the US has been involved in the political landscape of Iraq even before the advent of World War II. In 1979, when Saddam became prime minister, there was a concerted effort by him and his close family members in conjunction with people of his hometown to establish a dictatorship. Jimmy Carter, who was the president of the United States during the Iran-Iraq war, chose to be “neutral” when the war initially broke out (Lenczowski 8). Secretly though, the US was accused of aiding the Iraqis in a bid to undermining the rule of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. The tilt in the US policy of neutrality was born out of the hostage situation that occurred when Iran held 52 Americans. However, records show that the US was involved in funding Iraq through Saudi Arabia. The US was hoping that by propagating the war, the Iranians would eventually run out of supplies and would need spares. Here, they anticipated that the Iranian resolve would have been eroded and they could secure their hostages. The US did no however anticipate that the Iranians would turn to Vietnam where they themselves had left enough spares during their invasion there. The US deliberately exposed the weaknesses that the Iranians had in a bid to inciting the Iraqis into the war. This collaboration of the US with Iraq born out of the common enmity with Iran was aimed at serving the purpose of quelling the opposition that the Iranian administration had of the West and of retaining Iraq as a strategic partner in the continued inhabitation in the region. However, the US only looked at the areas that they were to gain, did not see the actions
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
According to the paper the roots of democracy also originate from the medieval Islamic period, when then rulers were ruling the public of Medina democratically. Democracy is basically such a ruling pattern in which great emphasis is laid on assigning rights to the common public and endowing the people who construct the nation with the benefits achieved by those in authority.
Acceptable governance consists of rule of law, efficient institutions of state, unhidden management and accountability of citizen issues, human rights protection and the right intervention of the public in the decision making process regarding their lives and country (Osborne, 2010, p.91).
She lost her father in 1881. She realized that as she belonged to the first generation of college women, she had obligations to the society. She did not marry because in her times, it was not common for the married women to follow a career. She remained unmarried throughout her life and concentrated on whatever she chose to do.
Unfortunately, democratic changes integrated from within, seem to be the only variant that is possible to be implemented. Despite of the fact that the USA declared itself to be a missionary bringing democracy to the developing countries; it should not be a dominating force bringing the changes.
In the eyes of numerous proponents of spreading democracy on the Iraqi soil Iraq is supposed to become an example to follow (a “City on the Hill”) for the rest of Arab states in the Middle East and other regions of the
Democracy can be seen at its best in some countries while in some other countries same thing cannot be said even though they claimed to be so. For example India is considered to be one of the strongest democratic countries in world while Pakistan is considered to be
Freedom and democracy are nothing when citizens won’t pursue it. Liberal democracy lacked thus lacked independent force in order to be enforced in Eastern Europe since World War I and World War II had left Europe in ruins of chaos, confusion, and
The United States should continue in its efforts of spreading democracy as it has historically been proven that people that live under democratic government systems often tend to live far better lives as
It is an academic–community partnership that involves the University of Colorado and some community-based health centers that serve some regions of Colorado. “Cavity Free at Three” offers education and training to healthcare providers such as doctors, nurses,
2 Pages(500 words)Article
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Spreading Democracy for FREE!