Slavery Legacy anf Its Influence on Economic Development of U.S. South - Assignment Example

With the elimination of slavery during the civil war, African- Americans slaves during the earlier periods had fundamentally no introduction to proper education. Evidently, the elevated extent of proceeds disparity, results from the influence of slavery on the existing finances. It is crucial to denote the impacts of slavery on the economy of the U.S. South. This is because the south experiences constant poverty. It has an elevated poverty rate than the American standard. It is important to assert that slavery contributed to the economic development of US; however, it posed numerous challenges in the realms of industrialization, education, and income equality.

Slavery affected the early and present development of the south in subtle ways a well. With most of their wealth tied up in slaves, slave owners naturally strove to maximize the value of this asset. Given the mobility of forced labor, owners could afford to be footloose, regularly moving their slaves from place to place to access the higher productive land. In contrast to their land-owning counter parts in the north, slaveholders had little incentives to spend in regional infrastructure, schools, or roads to encourage the growth of towns.

All activities were associated with augmenting land cost but had no obvious impact on slave values. Thus, the south stayed more rural and institutionally underdeveloped compared to the north. For similar explanations, southerners did not expand their financial activities like investing in manufacturing. In 1840s, the south’s per capita investment in manufacturing was less than one-third of the north’s, a trend attributable to the south’s lack of urbanization, lack of infrastructure, unequal distribution of incomes, smaller home markets, and poor access to resources (Scott 313).

In areas that relied heavily on slave labor, the economy focused narrowly on Agricultural activities and, Industrialization delayed. Industrialization was the south’s second importance (Scott 313). There was a hold back in manufacturing and commerce in the old South for three reasons. First, the slaves ware not capable of mastering the precise, delicate operations that manufacturing supposedly involved. Second, masters did not have the idea to gather adequate resources or the need to invest in industrialization (Smith 73).

Thirdly, the absence of big town in the South was a necessary consequence of the insurrectionary risks such as concentrations of slaves would pose to southern society (Smith 73). Slavery was root to inequality. This has to date affected the education in the South. There is still bottomless and broad literature on the educational divide in the south. The proper learning was in accessible in the past to the slaves. Their first offspring were only able to complete fewer years of education on standard than the whites were.

Furthermore, they had access to racial isolated communal schools, where they received a quality lower learning compared to that acquired by southern whites. Low learning and excellence led to the continuation of huge earnings difference. This has affected the economy of the south even today. The existing differences at the south are linked with disparity in earnings. Former slave countries are currently more imbalanced. They show a higher scarcity pace and a higher amount of racial discrimination.

Moreover, racial inequality, which