Nobody downloaded yet

Could the south have won the civil war If so how, if not then why not - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Could the south have won the civil war? If so how, if not then why not? The American civil war emerged as the differences between the North and the South gained militant character. The war had been in the making largely due to socio-economic differences in the north and the south…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
Could the south have won the civil war If so how, if not then why not
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Could the south have won the civil war If so how, if not then why not"

Download file to see previous pages The north had a largely urbanised background with flourishing industrial capabilities. Rapid technological developments were shaping how things had been done for centuries. The railroad was expanding westwards and liberty was in the air. Large manufacturing concerns were being established. Management was evolving to promote efficiency and innovation. Furthermore, a class of individuals was emerging that were to become the modern American middle class. These groups were ardent political supporters of anti slavery drives though their numbers were as yet not very significant. On the other hand, the south was predominantly agricultural. Farm labour consisted of slaves whose ancestors had been imported from Africa. Conservatism was rampant and white supremacy was considered as an ultimate truth. Capital was abundant too as the large farmers had no one to share profits with. Cotton was the mainstay of the southern economy. It was exported to cotton mills in Europe and in the north. Military tradition was more rampant in the south than in the north. Boys were taught how to ride and shoot at an early age given the agrarian society’s feuds. The war began as the south gathered its army and invaded Fort Sumter in South Carolina. Then President Abraham Lincoln urged northern states to assemble a volunteer army to deal with the situation. This caused another four states to drift over into the southern camp. The south’s position was strengthened at this point in the war. If the south had wanted to make major strides in the war, it ought to have been better planned and organised than it was. The attack of the Confederate army on Fort Sumter caught the north off guard. The south could have achieved major victories if it invaded with a larger army that engaged more targets simultaneously. This would have helped the south in causing panic and confusion in the ranks of the north. The overwhelming display of power may even have led to more accessions by Union states. Furthermore, the organised all out attack would have sent the Union running and figuring out what to do next. However, what happened on ground was entirely different. The Confederacy’s attack on Fort Sumter served as a rallying point for the northern states. It alerted them to the danger posed by the South. The Union was both proactive and swift in its reaction. An army of volunteers was assembled on ground while a naval blockade was imposed. The Union’s land armies could not achieve victories in the beginning. The level of organisation and the equipment used were not up to the mark. However, the naval blockade served as a double edged sword. On the one hand, the export of cotton virtually ended and on the other hand imports could not be brought in to reinforce the Confederate army’s stock. As mentioned earlier, cotton was the mainstay of the southern economy. Loss of cotton exports meant that revenue generation suffered gravely in the south. The naval blockade also had another profound effect. Foreign intervention was discouraged from taking any real part given the naval blockade. Foreign intervention could only be possible if the naval blockade was removed and foreign troops and supplies could flow into the south. No external power was ready or willing to support the South’s cause by direct military involvement. Another notable issue is the way in which this war was conducted on either side. Initially the south was very aggressive. It ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Could the south have won the civil war If so how, if not then why not Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1429571-could-the-south-have-won-the-civil-war-if-so-how
(Could the South Have Won the Civil War If so How, If Not Then Why Not Essay)
“Could the South Have Won the Civil War If so How, If Not Then Why Not Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1429571-could-the-south-have-won-the-civil-war-if-so-how.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
The U.S. Civil War was more about State rights than the liberation of slaves
The war claimed more lives than the combination of wars such as the American Revolutionary War, the First World War, the Second World War, the 1812 war, as well as the Vietnam War. The causes of the war originated from the tensions that existed between the Northern and the Southern States (Barney 2011, p.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
The Confederacys Defeat in the Civil War
The Confederacy consists of seven Deep South cotton states seceded by February 1861, and includes South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. In the year 1861 four more states seceded and joined the Confederacy, and these states were: Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina and Virginia.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Civil War History: Discussion Questions (1 source each, approx 125 words)
In a broad perspective, the Union, which was also knows as the Northern states, held their goals straight and fought for unity. Their position in the war was strong because of their army men and more importantly because of their goals to protect the rights of the states under constitution whereas the confederation wanted to form an independent republic.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
The Post Civil War South Essay
For the antebellum South, cotton was king and land ownership provided the social capital necessary to acquire and maintain economic status. The South's heavy reliance on agriculture, as opposed to industry, as a means to flourish economically during this period depended on the plantation system of landowners and slavery.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
History / Civil War
According to the Foner (1969, p. 262), the Wilmot Proviso is the 8 August 1846 proposal of Pennsylvania’s Democratic Congressman David Wilmot that “slavery be excluded from any territory the nation acquired from Mexico” as a result of the Mexican-American War.
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
Why was Ulysses S. Grant so successful in finally ending the Civil War
Even though Grant lost the status of a war hero when he reached the post of Presidency due to corruptions, he is still known and remembered for his civil war time tactics. Historical records have documented that American Civil War came to the end in the year of 1865 and the
19 Pages(4750 words)Research Paper
Civil War Essay
Following the other historical interpretation this war is known as War between the States which is also called the War of the Rebellion, the War of Secession, and the War for Southern Independence. The causes of the war were a complex series of events, including slavery.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Causes of the Civil War
w World, which is America, during the 1800’s are used as laborers and servants; therefore a property of the landowners, which eventually became the cause of the American Civil War (Halsey & Shores 1966-1972). Civil unrests building up to a great extend usually results to a
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Why the North won the American Civil War
Following the other historical interpretation this war is known as War between the States which is also called the War of the Rebellion, the War of Secession, and the War for Southern Independence. The events which helped the North to win can be divided in to two basic groups: economic situation of the country and favorable conditions during the war period.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
North vs South - How the North won the Civil War
; it led to the preservation of the union, facilitated the abolition of slavery and it changed the association between the federal government and the states in a dramatic way. There have occurred endless debates that concern the civil war; people wonder whether it is true that
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Could the south have won the civil war If so how, if not then why not for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us