StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Legal Execution of Juvenile offenders - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of this paper "Legal Execution of Juvenile offenders" revolves around the statement that “Juvenile offenders who commit murder under the age of 18 should not be legally executed.” There are various reasons for supporting this stance…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.7% of users find it useful
Legal Execution of Juvenile offenders
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Legal Execution of Juvenile offenders"

?Running Head: Juvenile Offenders Juvenile Offenders [Institute’s TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 Introduction4 Statement of Problem 4 Discussion 4 Conclusion 9 References 11 Juvenile Offenders Abstract This paper revolves around the statement that “Juvenile offenders who commit murder under the age of 18 should not be legally executed.” There are various reasons for supporting this stance. First, juvenile offenders who are less than the ages of 18 are not mature enough to understand the full weight of their decisions. Second, they also fail to communicate well within court environments and it is easy for the attorneys to force them to change their statements. Third, majority of the juvenile offenders have a traumatic history which not only questions their mental health but also the efficiency of social institutions such as schools, high schools, hospitals, family and others to ensure proper development of children. Fourth, European Convention of Human Rights, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child and other international charters and conventions clearly state about the right of every person to live and the fact that children can not receive capital punishments. Fifth, the public opinion is supports the stance of this paper. Sixth, capital punishment evades the chance of any individual to prove him or her innocent in future in light of any new developments or evidence. Introduction This paper is an attempt to explore the controversial, serious, and debatable issue about juvenile offenders. The paper discusses the question of legal execution of juvenile offenders who are less than the age of 18 years and have committed a murder. Statement of Problem The paper will take the stance that "Juvenile offenders who commit murder under the age of 18 should not be legally executed". Therefore, the paper will shed some light on the arguments, opposing legal execution of such juvenile offenders. Furthermore, the paper will also take up the arguments presented by the supporters of legal execution of such juvenile offenders and would try to prove that why those arguments are incorrect or sufficient to base a final decision on them. There are various reasons behind choosing this topic. First, since the past few years, this issue has been of great attention and debate in the public and expert circles. Second, in light of my personal stance on the topic, I believe that by legal execution of juvenile offenders, the law enforcement agencies are not following but breaking the law and contributing to a crime and it is our responsibility to play our part to stop it. Third, children are the future of any nation and if they are committing such actions then this is a wake up call for all authorities and with the help of this paper, I put emphasis on the fact that it is time for them to sit down and reexamine the entire system and the root cause of the same. Discussion One of most important arguments in opposition of juveniles facing legal execution is the fact that studies have shown that children under the ages of 18 are still in their developmental stages. During this age, juveniles are still immature and they fail to understand the full weight and consequences of their decision (Siegel & Welsh, 2008). Furthermore, children are more vulnerable to peer-pressure and are more likely to engage in risky behaviors. Since they are developmentally different from adults, they fail to control their temptations and impulses, which make it morally incorrect to treat them as adults or blame them for their actions in the same way as adults (Hesse, Lawrence & Hesse, 2009). That is also the reason why 18 years is the minimum age for every big step in life. There are many countries in the world, which do not allow marriage before the age of 18; in fact, some countries and states extend the same to the limit to the age of 21 (Boesky & American Correctional Association, 2002). Moreover, 18 years is also the minimum age for voting, entering into a contract, become a part of juries, take important positions as an employee, take important medical decisions, enter the military and others. If the law recognizes that people are not mature enough to take important decisions until they are 18 then why would the law treat juveniles same as the adults when it comes to legal execution (Benekos & Merlo, 2008; Binder, Geis, & Bruce, 2000). It is also important to note that children are also not fit for the court and prison environment where they would have to deal with attorneys and answer the tricky questions of lawyers. Children are poor witness, they tend to forget things and cannot memorize accurately. Furthermore, not only it is easy to trick or force children into providing specific information but it is also easy to tame their statements and behaviors (Binder, Geis, & Bruce, 2000). Therefore, whatever information children would provide in the court, there are all the chances, that information might not be correct and the child may not even have a clue about the same (Boesky & American Correctional Association, 2002). Evidence from almost all studies about juvenile criminals in United States shows that majority of these children belong to low middle class families, homeless families, orphans, have suffered through mental and physical trauma, were subjected to sexual and physical abuse and others. In short, it is highly likely that the juveniles who would be charged with murder would be suffering from extreme mental and emotional trauma (Siegel & Welsh, 2008). Most of these children have a history, which blames the entire society because it is the society, its elders and the institutions within it, which are responsible for the positive and healthy development of children (Hesse, Lawrence & Hesse, 2009). Execution, imprisonment, fines, serving as volunteers, rehabilitation or any forms of punishment for the offender are not for the sake of it but they are a way with which the law enforcement agencies hope to make the society a better place (Benekos & Merlo, 2008). Punishment is a tool with which the law enforcement agencies believe to reinforce the message of peace and living as a good citizen in the hearts and minds of the offenders for the rest of the lives. However, with legal execution or capital punishment, there is no possible way that society could become a better place. In fact, by legally executing a juvenile, the jury would deprive the society with what could have been a creative and contributing youth or adult in the society. Juveniles, who commit murder, do not commit the crime out of evil or because they are bad people, they do it, mostly, because they had suffered from mental and emotional disorders due to their past events in their lives (Scott & Steinberg, 2008). Therefore, it becomes the responsibility of the institutions to make sure that juvenile offender receives medical and mental care to ensure that the child could live the life of a normal person. This does not mean that the offender must not stay in prison or receive no punishment at all for his or her acts but those punishments should be handed out in consideration with the physical and mental development of the child and the circumstances in which the offender committed the crime. Furthermore, there is also no possible justification for allowing the juvenile to remain in any adult prison. In fact, it should be ensured at all times that, juvenile offenders should stay away from adult and expert criminals. Not in United States but in many other countries in the world, criminal systems would merge the juvenile offenders with other criminals. Even the children, which are serving in the prison for less severe crimes, should not mingle with other criminals with serious and long criminal history. This way they would enter the prison as children but rather than improving or becoming a good citizen, they would end up becoming expert criminals with all possible knowledge about crimes and breaking the law (Binder, Geis, & Bruce, 2000; Scott & Steinberg, 2008). Another important argument in this regard comes from the law itself. Almost all international charters, human right conventions, and laws recognize the point that the right to life is the basic right of every person. For example, Article 2 of European Convention of Human Rights (Martin, 2006) states, “Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.” Furthermore, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Article 1, 3 and 5 (Martin, 2006) state, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood”, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person” and “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment”. More importantly, these laws are general but even the United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child (Martin, 2006) acknowledges in the Article 6, “Every child has the inherent right to life. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child”. Furthermore, the article 37 explicitly states, “No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, and neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age” (Hesse, Lawrence & Hesse, 2009). Important here to note is that if the government or law enforcement agencies decide to execute juveniles this would not send the right message to the child. Even if a child has taken some one’s life in his or her sane mind then by executing him or her, would not the government be taking the role of the criminal? If a child has taken someone’s life then by doing the same in terms of taking the life of that child, would not the government be committing a crime as well? Do two wrongs make a right? The government and the law enforcement agencies are not there to enforce the law of jungle in the society, which is “an ear for an ear”, “an eye for an eye” and “a life for a life”; however, these institutions are there to protect the society by “changing the lives” of offenders. Quite understandably, changing lives does not include taking away lives (Benekos & Merlo, 2008). According to many surveys and polls, the general opinion within public is against the legal execution of the juveniles. People have appeared to agree to the fact that in most of the cases, children who commit crime are not in their sane mind. They fail to think it through and weigh the consequences, unlike adults (Scott & Steinberg, 2008). The supporters of legal execution for juvenile offenders present their argument by saying that public opinion does not matter to the law. These people fail to understand that eventually it is the public opinion, which makes the law. In a democratic country like the US, the public elects its representatives for law making and policymaking; therefore, there is no point in avoiding the public opinion (Hesse, Lawrence & Hesse, 2009). According to the statistics from 1975 to 2005 of 23 states, more than 123 people who received death penalties later proved themselves as innocent and saved their lives. However, important here to note is that for all these people the clock was ticking and if they would have failed to provide the evidence or other arguments in time then they would have ceased to exist (Siegel & Welsh, 2008). Furthermore, it also shows that there is a possibility that many innocent people may have been executed just because they did not had enough time to prove their innocence. On the other hand, if the person receives a lifetime imprisonment sentence then he has to chance to prove his innocence in light of any new evidence, which comes up. As mentioned earlier that many juvenile offenders end up getting punishment not because they are guilty but because of their age and their mental level, they fail to convince people that they are innocent. Attorneys and public defenders fail to communicate well with children, offenders fail to identify witnesses, and the offenders may easily come under pressure and change their statements without even realizing the full weight of their actions (Siegel & Welsh, 2008). Conclusion Therefore, towards the end, it is understandable to conclude that there are few rational and logical arguments behind the supporting the legal execution of juveniles less than the age of 18 who commit murders or any other crimes. Not only in the recent past but also time and time again, the public voted for putting an end to the same and also the Supreme Court has its given its verdict in various cases such as in 2005 that legal execution of juveniles must not take place. The international conventions and charters of human rights, signed and approved by almost all countries of the world, clearly mention that every person has the right to live. More importantly, children have the right to liberty, life, and freedom more than anyone else does. Moreover, the UN Convention of Rights of Children also states that any child cannot be subjected to capital punishment (Siegel & Welsh, 2008). Not only is it incorrect and wrong on moral and ethical grounds but also, at the same time, even the law itself, as mentioned earlier as well, and psychology provides evidence of treating juvenile offenders differently. The government and the law enforcement agencies are there to ensure the protection of the people in the society and ensure that the offenders could rejoin the society as better people (Benekos & Merlo, 2008). However, killing juvenile offenders, who have great potential to improve and serve the society as better citizens, is the worst possible option for enforcing power and making the world a better place to live. References Benekos, P. & Merlo, A. (2008). “Juvenile Justice: The Legacy of Punitive Policy.” Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. January 2008 6: 28-46 Binder, A., Geis, G., & Bruce, D. D. (2000). Juvenile delinquency: historical, cultural, and legal perspectives. Elsevier. Boesky, L. M., & American Correctional Association. (2002). Juvenile offenders with mental health disorders: who are they and what do we do with them? American Correctional Association. Hesse, M. L., Lawrence, R., & Hesse, M. (2009). Juvenile Justice: The Essentials. SAGE. Martin, F. F. (2006). International Human Rights & Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press. Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. D. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Harvard University Press. Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. (2008). Juvenile delinquency: theory, practice, and law. Cengage Learning. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Juvenile Offenders Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1427661-juvenile-offenders-who-commit-murder-under-the-age
(Juvenile Offenders Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/history/1427661-juvenile-offenders-who-commit-murder-under-the-age.
“Juvenile Offenders Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1427661-juvenile-offenders-who-commit-murder-under-the-age.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Legal Execution of Juvenile offenders

Capital Punishment

This study will also introduce me with an unknown world that is riddled with chilled penury and perhaps the breeding ground of juvenile capital and other forms of crime.... I am sure that this will reveal more than I expect and explore the multifaceted reasons that lie behind the juvenile capital offenders.... It is expected to be shown that capital punishment has little to do with curbing juvenile capital crime.... This might help me to have a different outlook towards juvenile criminals and might even compel me to extend my helping hands towards them....
15 Pages (3750 words) Research Paper

A Case for an Intergrated Criminal Court and Against an Independent Juvenile Justice System

Majority of juvenile justice theorists and policymakers understand the purposeful union of juvenile courts with the adult criminal justice system but oppose the possibility of removing the juvenile courts and sentencing all kinds of criminals in criminal court.... Finally, advocates of an independent juvenile justice system call upon the contingency argument of Progressives (Feld, 1999): in spite of the procedural defects and evident impoverishment of juvenile courts, criminal courts represent more unpleasant locations to try and sentence juvenile delinquents....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Juvenile Life Sentencing was Recently Overturned by U.S. Supreme Court

The decision to overturn life sentence for juvenile offenders is an appropriate decision that should be supported by all stakeholders (Bajger Web).... Exposure to violent movies and lack of parental guidance are some of the major causes of juvenile crimes that are supported by modern lifestyles.... offenders who commit such crime are liable for life sentencing since the county ruled out death penalty.... In addition, life sentence for juvenile creates room for more minor offenders....
4 Pages (1000 words) Admission/Application Essay

The Influence of Prison Gang Affiliation on Violence and Other Prison Misconduct

According to Steinberg, "Most reasonable people agree that a small number of offenders should be kept out of the juvenile system because they pose a genuine threat to the safety of other juveniles, because the severity of their offense merits a relatively more severe punishment, or because their history of repeated offending bodes poorly for their ultimate rehabilitation" (1).... The question has been raised whether Rafael should be tried as an adult or be given the considerations afforded a juvenile....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Arguments for and against the Death Penalty

However, it was held that juvenile criminals, who were sixteen years or older, could be executed.... Taking this decision as a precedent, most states in the US had imposed the death penalty on juvenile delinquents who were sixteen years of age.... Justice Brenan opposed this decision and argued that such juvenile executions were in the breach of evolving standards of humanity in the US3.... he first ever reported execution in In December of that year, Captain George Kendall was shot dead by firing squad in Jamestown, USA....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Juvenile Executions

It also discusses the history of juvenile execution and the first-ever case held in the United States.... This research proposal "juvenile Executions" gives an overview of the juvenile execution system and how it came into effect.... The whole idea of the juvenile execution system is not a good form of punishment and many are now against it.... Many organizations are now fighting for the abolishment of the juvenile system entirely and they are hoping that they would succeed....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Proposal

Should Minors Be Charged as Adults in Court

The author argues that all states in America should adopt the policy of charging young offenders or minors as adults, as it seems to be very effective in helping America stop crime.... Most of the time, people tend to argue that young offenders should not be charged as adults and consider it as a radical and traditional way of thinking.... They also have the view that such young offenders do not need harsh punishments, but rather require rehabilitation, which will make them change their behavior....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Investigation of Juvenile Sex Offenses

juvenile offenders can sometimes be predatory as other adult sexual offenders.... Receiving protection from the silence about the act, which is a major characteristic of sexual offenses, juvenile offenders can possess the techniques of running away and making arrangements to maneuver the process of investigation.... This report "Investigation of juvenile Sex Offenses" seeks to explore the difficulties of sexual assault investigations involving juvenile sex offenders....
14 Pages (3500 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us