Outline The decision promotes correction of offender’s behaviors. The decision is constitutional The decision differentiates adulthood and childhood. Life sentencing for minor is cruel. Juvenile life sentencing was recently overturned by U.S. Supreme Court The decision by the US Supreme Court to eliminate sentencing minors under life imprisonment is a major achievement in the US judicial history…
Download file to see previous pages...
According to statistics on juvenile sentencing and cases, Florida leads other states in terms of offering harsh sentence to minors (Musgrave Web). The high court’s decision to overturn life sentencing for juveniles was heavily criticized by conservative justices throughout the country. However, the court’s ruling against juvenile life sentencing is constitutionally sound. This essay raises an argument in support of the decision made by the Supreme Court concerning juvenile life sentencing. It is a fact that minors are getting more involved in criminal activities than years before. This is a major problem to societies living in economically developed countries such as the US and several European countries. Juvenile cases range from minor case such as simple assaults in schools to armed robbery and murder. Offenders who commit such crime are liable for life sentencing since the county ruled out death penalty. Life sentence has now become the most severe punishment since the elimination of death sentence. The decision to overturn life sentence for juvenile offenders is an appropriate decision that should be supported by all stakeholders (Bajger Web). This is because sentencing minors to life imprisonment is not a solution to crime or the problem, but a cover up for the problem. An appropriate solution will be more concerned with finding the root causes of the problems than dealing with the aftermath. Such a solution does not give room to juvenile life sentencing. Exposure to violent movies and lack of parental guidance are some of the major causes of juvenile crimes that are supported by modern lifestyles. Life imprisonment for juvenile does not address either of this root cause and hence it is not a solution to the problem (Chambliss 102). In addition, life sentence for juvenile creates room for more minor offenders. The main purpose of the judicial system is to enhance correction of offenders. Decisions made by the judicial system through the court are executed by the correctional facilities such as prisons. Prisons are important facilities in a country; however, their roles are not fully understood by most people. Life sentencing of minor offenders is more of a punishment than a correctional decision. Eliminating the sentence from the penal code proves that the US judicial has great interest on implementing its purpose (Musgrave Web). The decision is therefore, of particular interest to the judicial system and the United States population. The decision also proves that the judicial system is ready to implement necessary reforms in such a time when the United States democracy is under criticism. Correction of wrong behaviors is important to both the country and the offenders. However, correction is more important when the offender is a minor than when the offender is an adult. Sentencing minors to life imprisonment denies them the chance to acquire correct behaviors. This is because when serving a life imprisonment, a person has no use for descent behavior. In addition, life sentence denies the culprit to practice descent behavior or to prove that they have acquired descent behavior from correctional facilities (Musgrave Web). The decision by the high court therefore proves that the US judicial system is in support of the correctional role of the judicial system. Life imprisonmen
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Juvenile Life Sentencing was Recently Overturned by U.S. Supreme Court Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1446819-juvenile-life-sentencing-was-recently-overturned
(Juvenile Life Sentencing Was Recently Overturned by U.S. Supreme Court Admission/Application Essay)
“Juvenile Life Sentencing Was Recently Overturned by U.S. Supreme Court Admission/Application Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1446819-juvenile-life-sentencing-was-recently-overturned.
Name Instructor Course Date Juvenile 2 The first group debate question is “should juvenile be tried as adults?” Pros a) Trying juvenile in court as adults helps in controlling crime. b) It acts as a deterrent for crime because it makes other juvenile to think twice before committing the crime because of the punishment.
Question 1 Facts In the case of Davis v. Washington, U.S. Supreme Court, (2006) where McCottry had been assaulted by Davis the boyfriend who had later on fled the scene. McCottry was supposed to testify for charges of felony violation of domestic order. This led to using hearsay from the 911 call recording that was made by McCottry despite Davis objection of not doing it.
Additionally, gender significantly influences the decision-making in matters affecting young delinquents, since the number of female offenders is usually negligible. Moreover, the pattern of young female offender is inconsistent. Another considered extralegal factor is the race
Money is necessary to run the economy of a country. “It is one of the most important concepts to be understood in the running of the worlds financial system” (Helfield, 2003). If we talk about the functions of money, we can
For example, if a student is being bullied at school, he will never let his teacher know about the problem and his victimization will continue to increase when he is not enjoying a trustworthy relationship
Crime prevention is enacted “before the act has been committed” (Welsh & Farrington 1). Moreover, preventions programs can be supported by different organizations which are not included in formal justice system unlike crime control which fully depends on it.
However, this view is too superficial – once we move these images imposed by consumer culture, we will see a kind of peculiar cultural DNA that distinguishes America from other countries, though American culture is a product of influence of a variety of national cultures. On
Basing on these researches the article to build on their hypothesis to exampling what they feel are the causes of discomfort towards modern day immigrants into United States. The researchers collect data from the State of California (Espenshade &