The Oslo I Accord or simply Oslo I, which indicates the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of the Declaration of Principles (DOP), set in 1993, was an attempt to establish a framework which would seek the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Why did the Oslo Peace Process fail"
Download file to see previous pages
It marked the initial face-to-face agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The activities surrounding the agreement arose from the Madrid Conference of 1991, carried out in Oslo, Norway, supported by the Fafo institute and cleared on the 20th of August 1993 (Brown, 2003). The Accords were then officially set to writing and signed during a public ceremony in Washington, D.C on the 13th of September 1993 before Yasser Arafat (PLO Chairman), Prime Minister of Israel Yitzhak Rabin, and President Bill Clinton of the United States of America (Brown, 2003). The documents were also supported and signed by other official signatories, including Mahmoud Abbas for the PLO, Shimon Peres, foreign minister for Israel, the US Secretary of State Warren Christopher for the US as well as Andrei Kozyrev, the foreign minister for Russia (Brown, 2003). The Accord supported the establishment of a Palestinian interim self-government, including the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). This PNA was set to bear responsibility for the management of the territory within its control (Brown, 2003). The Accords also supported the withdrawal of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) from various regions of the contentious Gaza Strip and the West Bank. It was expected that the arrangement would cover a five-year interim period where later a more permanent arrangement would be established, especially on issues like Jerusalem, Palestine refugees, Israeli settlements, and borders (Weinburger, 2007). This Oslo I was followed by Oslo II. In both accords, no independence was anticipated for Palestine. In general, the agreement emphasized the withdrawal of Israel personnel from different areas of the Gaza Strip as well as the West Bank. It also supported the right of Palestine for self-governance in these regions through the establishment of the Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority (Weinburger, 2007). The term of the Palestine was set to last for five years, at which time, more permanent arrangements would have been established for the two territories. Major problems, including the issue of Jerusalem, Palestinian refugees, as well as security and border issues were to be managed in other negotiations and arrangements (Weinburger, 2007). Israel was ready to grant an interim self-rule to Palestine in stages. Aside from the principles, the two groups put into writing the Letters of Mutual Recognition, as the Israeli government supported the PLO to be the legal representative of the Palestinians and the PLO also supported the right declared by Israel to exist (McMahon, 2009). The agreement also rejected and condemned terrorism, violence, and activities set to destroy Israel. The goal of the Israel-Palestine talks was to secure a Palestine Interim Self-Government Authority, for the people of the Palestine region in the West Bank as well as the Gaza strip, during the transitional 5-year period (McMahon, 2009). Before Palestinians could manage themselves based on democratic principles, general elections were set for the Council. The coverage of the Palestinian Council was the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Exempt were issues which would be managed during the permanent negotiations (McMahon, 2009). The two parties perceived West Bank and Gaza to be single territorial units. The five-year transition period would be seen with Israel withdrawing from the Gaza Strip and the Jericho area. Permanent status talks started soon enough between these territories (Quandt, 2001). A transfer of authority was also set between the Israel Defense Forces to the Palestinians on matters relating to education, culture, health, social welfare, taxation, and tourism. The Council would
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Executive Summary Elite Careers is an UK based recruiting agency, which is part of Elite, a ?300m turnover group of recruitment companies owned by James Caan. Elite Career recruits highly skilled and equipped prospective employees from emerging markets all over the world, for placements in well known companies that operate Africa, Middle East Asia and also Southern America.
Reasons Why The Oslo Peace Process Of The 1990s Failed To Deliver The Promise Of A Just And Lasting Peace Between Israel And The Palestinians. The Oslo Accords of the 1990s promised to bring an end to the conflicts over control of Palestine. Just when the world thought the tensions were about to be contained and a bi-lateral agreement would ensure that Israel and Palestine would co-exist peacefully and side-by-side, the violence started up all over again.
In order for organizations to be able to compete they must be positioned to constantly improve performance by cost reduction and innovation in services and products (Becker & Gerhart, 1996). Human Resource Management (HRM) theorists have conducted a number of studies designed to establish a connection between organizational performance and HRM (Cooke, 2000).
Educators, policy makers and researchers have consistently tied the achievement gap to the student dropout rate (Ladson-Billings, 2006). As a result, educators, parents, employers and policy makers have expressed concerned over the persistent high drop-out rate particularly among high school students (Burris & Welner, 2005).
For a synergy of the building blocks and tools to drive an organisation towards desired performance and outcomes, the missing link consists of what Kaplan and Norton (2008) described as “a comprehensive framework to integrate all these tools so that they are properly aligned and synchronised”.
These population fluctuations are determined by the most recent U.S. census data. States each have their own laws regarding the boundary-development of these legislative districts, but ultimately must meet Federal regulations. Some have criticized the fairness of the congressional redistricting process because of its tendency to promote domination of one party over the other in many states, as well as the ability for states to design maps that place opposing parties into fewer districts.
Outsourcing has moved from a niche technology management business practice to a typical strategic weapon. Business Process Outsourcing influences process driven efficiencies. BPO is emerging as a powerful and flexible approach that business leaders and nations can use to achieve a wide range of tactical and strategic aims.
The following objectives have been established to maintain focus of the study on the Assistance unit of MAPFRE to achieve the above aim. To determine the reasons which lead MAPFRE to embark upon the globalisation trend, to identify the reason of success in Americas and Mediterranean countries and failures in Germany, Japan and UK, etc.
It comprises of detailed strengths and weaknesses of the risk management planning process (John, Chris, Paul, and Karl, 2004, 13-14). It also includes how the group overcame difficulties while coming up with the risk management planning process and finally a deep evaluation of the risk management planning process of Chesapeake Energy.
5 Pages(1250 words)Dissertation
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the dissertation on your topic
"Why did the Oslo Peace Process fail"
with a personal 20% discount.