During the era of 1988, the citizens of Chile were under constant struggle to take the powers from their military. In Sandinistas it has been witnessed that the peace of the nation was threatened by their military forces. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Another Latin country, Panama is dependent on the fate of bad general for their democracy. The entire region that constitutes of Latin America is fighting against military rule and governments that are being operated in accordance to military regulations. Democracy in various areas have not been able to reach the advanced level because in these nations, officer groups are ready to give up their positions in government offices but are not ready to give up those functions that have civilian power. Those democracies that are still in their early stages are continuously being threatened by the military section of the country and these sections dictate how government needs to operate. One of the major problems faced by society is that the society is controlled by those who have more physical power such as the police force, the intelligence agencies and the defence. Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North represented the fact that countries that have strong democracies should always be alert about the connection between the public and the military.
The defence forces operate with great power and secrecy and this kind of behaviour is a very huge threat to the policy makers located in democratic settings. The same problem even exists in developing countries and the degree of this problem in developing countries is much higher.
Body The Story of Latin America and Role of the US The Latin American side of America started moving from dictatorship rule to democratic rule during 1970s; this transition has witnessed huge number of bargaining episodes taking place between the civilians and the military of Latin America (CHASTEEN, 2001). Several bargaining episodes have failed over the year and the end result of these failures has resulted in economical and political failures as well as defeat at the hands of their own military (FITCH, 1998). The main motive behind the failures of these bargaining episodes has always been the protection of the interest of the defence system. The degree of control that civilians have gained during these bargaining episodes has have never been constant and has been dependant on the strength of the forces of military. The decision of how much power is to be vested in the civil side of the nation has been decided on the basis of concerns for national security. Various countries that have an interest in Latin America has helped in developing the military section of the region. These countries includes: US, Spain, France and other European countries, but the most influential of all these countries has been the United States. When questions are raised against US intervention in the military section of Latin America, these questions have been answered while keeping in view the strategic importance of intervention for Washington. During the year 1987, the military section of US that is responsible for safeguarding the southern side of US was provided with only 4% of assistance from security agencies through the world (DENT, 1995). The southern section only received less than
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Unfortunately, this has not been the case with some governments, which are notably led by self centered individuals, who will go to great lengths so as to hold on to power, against the will of their fellow citizens. Consequently, dissidents find ways of getting them out of power either constitutionally or through other means such as military intervention.
Amongst India’s sixty-year-old democratic experiment, achievement is the sheer durability of its liberal constitution. Almost all countries that gained independence in the post-WWII wave of decolonization have failed to carry out open and just elections, shield and boost essential rights, and uphold the civilian rule of the military.
In America, democracy comes from status Vivendi where the people are more superior to the government while in Russia democracy stems from the understanding that people identify with both the government and its sovereignty. In America, democracy helps the citizens constantly analyze the reaction of the government towards its people.
Robert Dahl, arguably the most influential American political scientist of the 20th century reckons that democracy is a utopian concept that is not found anywhere in contemporary geo-politics. In its stead, leading industrial societies of the world, including the United States have a ‘Plutocracy’, where power is shared and wielded by various major public institutions.
Now they can leave home and be independent. These new independents may apply for a job and do what they had long wanted to do and buy what they had wanted to buy because their parents forbade them not to do or buy before.
Democracy can also be defined as the right to vote in any organization.
In the eyes of numerous proponents of spreading democracy on the Iraqi soil Iraq is supposed to become an example to follow (a “City on the Hill”) for the rest of Arab states in the Middle East and other regions of the
The limitations of democracy are common, but its benefits can be attained in the end. American legal system and laws are increasingly defective. Democracy principle bends towards the benefit of the wider society. Democracy’s inadequate skill is not detrimental, however, as the errors are correctable.
It may then spread from the low level to high levels. Corruption can be sporadic or occasional. Corruption at high levels is, however, very dangerous especially to democracy than low-level corruption. If the high-levels of
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Obstacle To Democracy: Military for FREE!