Midterm - Term Paper Example

Download file to see previous pages... This concept of state could have led the division of the whole world into states which triumph as a form of political organization. Although they could be universal they could not clearly be the only political actors due to impacts of organizations, for example, International Monetary Fund and the Microsoft. The political process comprises of establishing the priorities and the scale of policies, goals values and interests within and among political communities. The nature and quality development of, political community, varies due to how differences in potential values, interests and values could be handled. This could be through rules, institutions and procedures. The creative tension between conflicting interests, values, interest and preferences could distinguish the political communities. On the other hand, there could be consensus and communal ties on orientation and key features of political community. The work of the democratic process would be to find a balance between the two sides of the equation. A life or death situation could emerge through debates and different views on cases of the political community. The emergence could be evoked in times of war or during external or internal attacks among the member of a community. The threat to the community could be true although total consensus could be maintained before the essence of real danger. This could reveal how dictatorship was born thousands of the year back. The birth of dictatorship could be justified today by the imposition of a single opinion on various issues at the end of a real political community. If the conflicts systematically predominate, over the agreement on primary goals and procedures the political community becomes inefficient and could be threatened by a breakdown. Past and current experience could have taught other way of domestic political order to dynamic function of democracy. LIST B: QUESTION 1 AGE OF THE EMPIRE Huntley (22) refers to the period between 1875 and 1914 as the Age of the Empire. This is not only due to the fact that a new strain of imperialism emerged during this time, but also because of a very archaic reason. It was period during which the number of rulers who viewed themselves (officially) or viewed by western scholars as worthy of the “emperor” tag was the highest. In Europe the rulers of Austria, Germany, Turkey, Russia and (in their glory as rulers of India) Britain laid claim to this title. Of the five, India/Britain and Germany emerged in the 1870s, and they more than made up for the decline and disappearance of Napoleon’s “Second Empire”. Outside Europe, rulers of Japan, Persia, China and- maybe with a broader attribute of global diplomatic courtesy- Morocco and Ethiopia were gradually allowed this tag, while up until 1899 Brazil had an American emperor. By 1987, Japan was the only country that could still be said to have a super-monarch, but its political influence and profile had already waned significantly (Huntley 39). The military and economic supremacy of capitalist nations had lacked serious challengers for a very long time, but there were no planned attempts made to extend this to formal annexation, administration and conquest between the latter years of the 18th century and the last 25 years of the 19th century. However, from 1880 to 1914 they were made, and a majority of countries ...Download file to see next pagesRead More