The national security strategy of 1995 Clinton administration was listed out in a document titled, A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, published by the White House in February 1995 (The White House, 1995)…
Download file to see previous pages...
The national security strategy of 1995 Clinton administration was listed out in a document titled, A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, published by the White House in February 1995 (The White House, 1995). The new strategy had its attention more focused on the “ethnic conflicts” which were on the rise all over the world and also the challenges raised by the so-called “rogue states” (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). Another major aspect of the change that was reflected in the NSS 1995 was the shifting of attention of the US from the communist nations, towards a wider geopolitical realm, to say, the whole world. Geo-politically, the two major concerns, which have prompted the formulation of a new security strategy for the US, had been “the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction” and the “political instability in many countries and regions” caused by population explosion and “environmental degradation” (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). It was evident that the US was redefining its national security concerns on geo-political lines rather than the previous practice of seeing national security in relation with the ideological realm, especially communism. The immediate yet indirect threats to global political stability from certain regions and nations based on geopolitical issues like ethnicity, and environment were seriously accounted for, the first time in US history. The new National Security Strategy was prepared “in accordance with Section 603 of the Goldwater- Nichols Defense Department Reorganization Act 1986 (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). The declared key objectives of this strategy document had been, “to sustain our [America’s] security with military forces that are ready to fight, to bolster America's economic revitalization [and] to promote democracy abroad” (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). The first two objectives represented the natural security concerns of any nation but the third objective was specific to America with its long history of intervening in the matters of other nations with a vision of a global super power. And the attention imparted to link the economic development of the nation with the security aspect is again unique to the US. This is an indicator of the geo-political stand that this country has been adopting ever since its establishment as a rich and powerful nation. The dependence of the US economy on weapon trade, oil, and other natural resources (scarce inside the nation and available in plenty in the third world and the Middle East) can be one reason why concepts of security become entangled with internal matters of foreign countries and regions for this nation, thus giving national security a distinct global geopolitical edge. For example Saudi Arabia has been “the largest customer for US military hardware” (Cohen, 2003, p.356). Similarly, the greatest labor force that America has to run its industries has been flowing from Mexico (Cohen, 2003, p.135). And “the United States invaded Haiti in 1915 to protect U.S. investments and properties in a military occupation that lasted until 1934” (Cohen, 2003, p.107). Making of the NSS The National Security Strategy document is prepared by the US government administration beginning the process with a “preferred approach to national security” (Bartolotto, 2004, p.6). The “process of initiating, controlling, developing, writing, and publishing the NSS” is entrusted with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, who also is the head of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“A geopolitical analysis of The Clinton Administration's 1995 National Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1393425-a-geopolitical-analysis-of-the-clinton-administrations-1995-national-security-strategy
(A Geopolitical Analysis of The Clinton Administration'S 1995 National Research Paper)
“A Geopolitical Analysis of The Clinton Administration'S 1995 National Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1393425-a-geopolitical-analysis-of-the-clinton-administrations-1995-national-security-strategy.
It is because of this reason that several measures have been taken by the governments to ensure a terrorism free world. This situation has led to a confusion between the governmental agencies as to how much they should interfere in the lives of individuals.
Following this act of terrorism America became a war nation, everything in the country including policies were developed to fight terrorism. The measures taken by the government to protect the citizens were extreme. The federal government also went forth to establish an antiterrorism unit or a special police department that handles terrorist and terrorist related cases.
National security is paramount to both the people as well as the federal government. The relationship between individual privacy and national security is the basis of the controversies surrounding the topic. Although this topic is concerned with current issues that are of public concern, it is a wide topic.
Furthermore, the paper gives an instance of an agency in the federal, state and local law-enforcing unit. Lastly, the paper looks at case studies in which all the agencies whether federal, state or local were involved in enforcing law and protecting their citizens.
Introduction 10 2.1. The US Middle East Relationship: The Foundation 11 2.2. US National Security Strategy 15 2.3. Middle East in the Face or at the Heart of Globalization 20 2.4. US Middle East Relationship in the era of Globalization 22 2.5. Some Gaps 25 Summary 25 Chapter 3 Research Methodology 3.0 Introduction Research methodology shows the development of the paper, how a researcher should begin, how success is measured and what contributes to the success of the study.
Both documents together adequately articulate the ‘ways’ and ‘means to implement the administration’s view with regards to the national security as defined in the 2010 National Security Strategy (NSS). Threats to American security and interests have become more defuse, harder to anticipate and more difficult to combat.
National Security which was directed by Dennis Dugan utilizes adequate slow-mo shots and shimmering cinematography in the first thirty minutes to guarantee the distinction. The existence of Martin Lawrence only assists to waste feel like a Bay retreat. In place of enigmatic will Smith, Martin Lawrence associates with an unusually unbearable Steve Zahn who stars as Hank Rafferty.
NATIONAL PURPOSE Iraq as a nation is going through a transformation from a dictatorship nation to a democratic one. This however has been greatly affected by the security affairs of the country, the religious difference as well as political and international community’s interests.
Security is one of the basic necessities of all the people so that they can live in a harmonious environment, hence to ensure security of personal and civil liberties there is a thin line which need not be crossed under any circumstances. To some extent violation of the rights of individuals as well as civil liberties to ensure the security of the nation is justified.
On the one hand, the main difference between these approaches was caused by political situations and foreign policies provided by Bill Clinton and George Bush. Clinton's defeat motivated him to adopt a more cautious, pragmatic, and moderate approach reflected the post-Cold war situation needed the policy of "engagement and enlargement".
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic A geopolitical analysis of The Clinton Administration's 1995 National Security Strategy for FREE!