The Global Justice Movement: A Contemporaneous Prototype of Global Movement Introduction The academic field of social movements is undergoing a major restoration because of the growing occurrence of protest and resistance all over the world and to its new global nature…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Is it accurate to describe the Global Justice Movement as a 'global movement'"
Download file to see previous pages
For instance, the global character of these emergent social movements reflects the contemporary movement of ideas, information, products, and people. The movement of people outside national borders are viewed as outbursts of aspirations, and by itself, they are considered integral to sociological analysis (Goodwin & Jasper 2009). The French sociologist Bourdieu (2001 cited in Ruggiero 2002) asserts that governments should meddle with the rules running the economy. At the same time, he emphasises the appearance of new kinds of political movement, and new forms of organisations driven by self-supervision, and “characterised by a structural lightness allowing agents to reappropriate their role as active subjects” (Ruggiero 2002: p. 48). These present-day social movements are described to develop precise goals, to take on kinds of activity of high representative character, to be global, and to demand highly dedicated personal involvement from members, and to form themselves as freely organised systems (Della Porta & Diani 2006). The Global Justice Movement exhibits almost all of these features. This paper tries to determine whether it is accurate to describe the Global Justice Movement as a ‘global movement’. The Contemporary Global Movement The initial years of the 21st century were a period of hope and enthusiasm for many people across the globe. A new form of social movement was developing. Driven by the dialogical and varied networks of protest envisioned by the Zapatistas, an array of popular movements and militant-directed non-governmental groups, maybe mostly but absolutely not totally from the global North, were banding together to form a mobilization of movements opposed to neoliberal globalisation (Eschle & Maiguashca 2005). Some of them are enemies of the World Trade Organisation, World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund; supporters of global finance capital taxation; critics of the strengthened control of multinational entities; proponents of debt assistance for Third World countries; and detractors of capitalism motivated by different expressions of socialist and revolutionary principles. Nevertheless, the 9/11 attack and their consequences have raised difficult challenges to the GJM. The social significances connected to the terrorist attack in the U.S., the legitimisation of militaristic nationalism forces and the accompanied transformations in the political arena of global governance have merged to change the political setting where in the movement works (Amoore 2005). In this environment of terror and nearly unanimously exercises of U.S. power, mechanisms of political, social, and economic de-territorialisation which had reinforced the development of global movements may be more and more re-expressed in nationalistic ways (Mayo 2005). Whether the Global Justice Movement is capable of calming the neo-imperial rage, holding back the powerful drag of nationalisms, and thus preserving its thrust towards a more unified, peaceful, and just global order remains unresolved. There are major similarities between the current global anti-war movement and GJM. These similarities attest to the fact the GJM is indeed a ‘global movement’. Primarily, a great deal of the anti-war movement has taken on GJM’s very effective network framework of global grassroots political movement feature. Second, organisations and leaders integral to the GJM have turned out to be strongly involved in the anti-war move
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The author states that if a claim is made for the future generations, then it will be possible to take away from the current world order, which has certainly been responsible for much of the earth’s environmental damage, the power to continue doing what it is currently doing so that there might be a break from the environmental degradation.
It is unfortunate that these inequalities are more than the estate was about 50 years ago. It is unfortunate that from the many that with the changes taking place in the world today, there are higher cases of inequalities than in the previous years (Schaefer 2007, p23).
While poor countries and development agencies have been battling at international conferences for a change in world trade rules, a parallel initiative has emerged that aims to harness Western consumers addiction to coffee and chocolate in the fight against poverty. From humble
Some of the global educators have included the study of global issues into curriculum and sought the interaction with the other global educators. Kenneth Tye in his article "World View: Global Education as a Worldwide Movement" has investigated what exactly has been done recently to include the global education into school curriculum.
One such coverage, for example, by the global organization The Christian Science Monitor, the movement is painted as being misdirected, and a force that can potentially harm ordinary people. This is because, as that news outfit reports, the Occupy Movement
Similarly, at a railway crossing, the red lights flashing, that flare in alteration is static though normally appears to be in motion. Due to these examples, it is therefore evident that not everything that one sees is
The historically accepted Hobbes document, Social Contract, affirms that justice is based on compliance with the social contract. The Social Contract document is the brainchild of Thomas Hobbes. The document affirms that a person who did not sign or enter into any contract is not bound by the contract.
Great inequalities are observable between different people within each society, and between societies as a whole, and yet most people would agree that it is a good thing for governments, corporations, international agencies and individuals to strive towards social justice.
The basic idea was to incorporate resources and skills in order to facilitate humanitarian activities all over the world. Moreover, they aspire to encourage and promote peace by eliminating human adversaries1. It has satisfactorily performed after the World War I in dealing with different calamities and warfare consequences.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Is it accurate to describe the Global Justice Movement as a 'global movement'"
with a personal 20% discount.