Nobody downloaded yet

Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons views on the Ottoman Empire - Term Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
In this paper “Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgson’s views on the Ottoman Empire” the comparison between two historians will be made in an attempt to understand the operations of the empire and its success since its inception and prior to 1600 AD…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons views on the Ottoman Empire
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons views on the Ottoman Empire"

Download file to see previous pages There was an accepted mode of coexistence that was not occasionally as disruptive as a society as such would be in the modern world. This, however, did not mean that the different religious factions existed in absolute peace without any animosity or bad blood. On the contrary, there were documented cases of massacres and discrimination all over the empire that seemed to have been sparked by hatred and a religious bias.  The breakdown of the empire of the Seljuk Turks was the catalyst in the formation of the Ottoman Empire1 which was one of the few surviving empires at the time. The Ottoman Empire started as one of the small states that were formed after the initial breakdown and existed as thus for a longer period of time before the reign of Muhammad II saw the absorption of all neighboring Turkish states in one unified monarch that was referred to as the Ottoman Empire. The rulers in the Ottoman Empire were primarily the descendants of Ghazi warriors who were very successful in the formation of a superpower in Europe at the time when all the other empires around them were disintegrating2. The Ottoman Empire existed peacefully with the other nations around it except for the occasional war that was primarily aimed at expanding trade routes or spreading the holy word of Islam. An alliance between the French and the Turks was formed later on with the driving force being a common enemy in Austria Hapsburg and Spain although it did not have much in the bearing of war. The then leader Sulayman (popularly referred to as Sulayman the magnificent) of the Ottoman Empire was responsible for creating this alliance. He was instrumental in the organization of the judicial system among many other accolades that he had and he was arguably one of the most successful rulers of the empire if not the greatest. In addition, his reign saw the flowering of Turkish literature, Ottoman architecture, and arts which served to expand the reach of the empire as scholars were attracted by them. Furthermore, traders also followed suit as the world was beginning to have an appreciation for the arts and literature although every culture had its own. The leader of the Ottoman Empire was popularly referred to as the sultan. The sultan was primarily charged with upholding the Muslim canonical law among many other implied responsibilities which were overshadowed by the fact that he was viewed as the representative of the Muslim God, Allah, on the ottomans. After the death of Sulayman, the Janissaries, who were largely Christians converted to Islam and trained to be deadly in war gained power and this was the cue for the empire to begin crumbling. Corruption then became the order of the day as the holders of the office of the day were charged with fleecing the people as they scrambled to keep what they would for themselves at the expense of the very people they were meant to be representative of. The first signs of the waning power of the empire lost in the battlefront, with enemies aligning with Austria in a bid to ceasing parts of the territory that was initially under the Ottoman Empire. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons views on the Ottoman Empire Term Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1392090-comparison-of-hodgson-s-view-and-inalcik-s-view-of
(Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons Views on the Ottoman Empire Term Paper)
https://studentshare.org/history/1392090-comparison-of-hodgson-s-view-and-inalcik-s-view-of.
“Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons Views on the Ottoman Empire Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1392090-comparison-of-hodgson-s-view-and-inalcik-s-view-of.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
ow
owaelchi added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
At first, I thought 29 of pages is too much for such a question. But now I see it could not be done better. As the author starts you see the difficulty of the topic. I’ve read all at once. Great sample

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons views on the Ottoman Empire

Safavids and Ottoman empire

...Comparisons between the Ideologies and Policies of the Ottoman and the Safavid Empires The two empires, the Safavid and the Ottoman, were built on two different sets of ideologies, rules, regulations and necessarily two different sets of belief. The geographical and the temporal features that prepared the plots for the rises of these two empires were different in nature. When the fragmentation of the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum after the Mongol invasion in Anatolia in the late 13th century planted the seed of the Ottoman Empire in one of the Beyliks, the fragments of the Turkish Anatolia, the Safavid Empire...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

History: Ottoman Empire

...of independence, and whose unique cultural realities enhanced and deepened that of the Ottoman Empire. Yet, as the Ottomans advanced toward West and the absorption of the Balkan and Greek peoples continued, the Persian and Turkic-oriented traditions of its rulers itself adopted several cultural aspects of the subjugated populations (Mansel 1996, 43). The Osmanli, or the men of the governing empire, got married to women of different indigenous groups (Aksan 2004, 58) and hence the leaders themselves were of varied cultural and racial legacy. Intellectual The integration of the Ottoman Empire into the capitalist global economy or modern...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Ottoman Empire

...?Ottoman Empire: A Comparison of government and administration, military strength and economy between the golden age and in the decline. IntroductionThe Ottoman Empire is one of the longest and largest empires of the world. It was founded in 1299 by the ruler, Osman I, by whose name the word ‘Ottoman’ is emerged, and lasted up to 1923 with establishment of the Republic of Turkey. The Empire was a strong force in the Middle East and it had extended its territories to all the sides. The Byzantine capital, Constantinople fell in the hands of the Ottoman ruler, Mehmed II thus making an end to the Roman...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Turkish Foreign Policy since the Ottoman Empire

...? Turkish Foreign Policy since the Ottoman Empire Introduction Since time immemorial, Turkey had been a predominantly a Muslim country that was controlled by the Sultanates of the Ottoman Empire. However, through a nationalist movement led by Musataf Kemal, Turkey was able to establish itself as a prosperous secular state that could assert itself as a force in the Central African region. To establish itself to be the modern day Turkey, it had to employ numerous strategies as the Ottoman Empire under the leadership of the Sultanates was greatly opposed to an independent Turkish state with a distinct language, dress code and run through...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Ottoman Empire golden age

...? Section/# The Golden Age of the Ottoman Empire: A Discussion of the Power and Importance of the Process ofCentralisation Though the use of superlatives is often incorporated with regards to understanding and defining many geopolitical structures that have existed since the dawn of time, it is not hyperbole to state that the Ottoman Empire was one of the longest lived, richest, and most successful empires that the world has ever seen. Beginning in the year 1299 and lasting up until the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1922, the 623 year span of time in nearly continual power that this Empire was able to exert was unmatched at...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Ottoman Empire

...Middle-East History The social and political history of the Ottoman Empire has been interesting area of research in various studies and it is essential to realize the several elements which influence the economy of the empire. Analyzing the factors that contributed to the decline of the Ottoman Empire, one realizes that the economy of this great Empire was largely dependent on gold and precious metals, the acute shortage of which influenced the weakening of the economy as well. One of the major impacts on the growth of the economy of the Ottoman Empire was the discovery and exploitation of the New World...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The history of Ottoman empire

...Ottoman empire The Ottoman empire was an imperial that existed from 1299 to 1922. At the height of its power in the 16th century, it included Anatolia, the Middle East, parts of North Africa, and much of south-eastern Europe to the Caucasus. It comprised an area of about 5.6 million km squared, though it controlled a much larger area through indirect rule in adjoining areas dominated mainly by nomadic tribes. The Empire was situated in the Middle East and West, and interacted with both the East and the West throughout its six-century history . The Ottoman Empire was established by the tribe of Kinsik Oghuz Turks, in...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

ECONOMICS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

...Economics of the Ottoman Empire Despite the decline of the Ottoman Empire after the 17th century, this imperial empire achieved significant fame because of its economic prowess and value of people welfare. The Ottoman man empire is believed to have had a well-organized government that was powered by economic gains in various areas (Bulut 192). The success of Ottoman Empire in commerce and economic remain to be remembered as sheer display of strength for the empire at a time when commerce was at infancy. The success of Ottomans Empire...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Colonialism. Ottoman Empire

... 30th November The Ottoman Empire Introduction The essay shall focus on colonization and the Ottoman Empire. It shall talk about the rise and fall of the empire and why colonization was a must for the colonization period and also for a group of people or colony to grow as an economy. The essay shall chart different parts of the empire, with the rise of the empire, the consolidation period and eventually the decline of the empire. The essay shall also focus on colonialism and how it has impacted the world history throughout the ages. Since it has two broad lines consisting of colonialism and Ottoman empire, the ideas is to trace the history of the Ottoman empire and link it with colonialism, thus trying to understand the impact... of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Ottoman Empire

...Legacy of the Ottoman Empire The contributions of Ottoman Empire to the development of Arab world in general and Turkey particular cannot be neglected. Even though Ottomans tried to extend their power to the entire Arab world, they were keen in preserving the values and beliefs of Islamic religion. They never tried to dilute religious principles and beliefs for economic and political gains. The contributions or the legacies of Ottoman Empire in political, economic and cultural circles are still helping Arab world in many ways. One of the major legacies left behind by the Ottoman Empire...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Halil Inalcik and Marshall Hodgsons views on the Ottoman Empire for FREE!

Contact Us