The Provision of Psychosocial Services - Article Example

A Critique of the Literature Name of the Student: Name of the Instructor: Name of the course: Code of the course: Submission date: Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 2 Title of articles 3 Abstract of article 4 Introduction of the article 4 Method of article 6 Results of article 7 Discussion of article 8 Conclusion of article 8 References of article 9 Conclusion 9 Works cited 11 A Critique of the Literature Introduction It is an apparent fact that the process of treating the victims of extensive burns remains to be confronted by major challenges. This is despite the enormous progresses that have been made in the realms of burn care in the past decades. This fact is supported by Corry, Pruzinsky and Rumsey (540) who cited that one of these intrinsic impediments is related to the necessity for psychosocial rehabilitation after the injuries associated with the burns which is linked to elevating the level of adjustment and social functioning. This phenomenon is made complex in a situation where the victim of the burn incident is a child who is confronted by both externalizing and internalizing behaviors like aggression and disturbances in sleep respectively. Moreover, burns have been associated with negative social implications on children. On the other hand, the parents of these children are often confronted by the challenges of complex, inherent feelings of guilt and depression as well as a marred image of being ideal parents (Phillips and Rumsey, 56). Against this background, this essay will critically analyze the work Considerations for the provision of psychosocial services for families following paediatric burn injury—A quantitative studyby Phillip and Rumsey aimed at ascertaining the validity of their presumptions in regard to the psychosocial needs of the families after paediatric burn injury. Title of articles The title of this article has profound relevance on the subsequent literature as well as the quantitative analysis in the subsequent sections. In addition, this title assumes an advocatory stance whereby based on the evidence presented in the ensuing analysis, it calls for the medical facilities to consider the provision of psychosocial services for families following paediatric burn injury. Abstract of article The abstract of this article have a summative approach where it clearly outlines the purpose of the study at the very beginning. It also proceeds with highlighting the methodology to be used in terms of sample size and criteria and the instruments put into utility. In addition, the general findings of the study are summarized in this abstract as well as the primary recommendations after this study based on the findings mentioned above. These recommendations include screening being a routine element in care as well as adoption and offering of routine evaluation and an approach which is family centered in the delivery of psychosocial support to all parents in absolute disregard of the size of burn amongst their children. Introduction of the article The introduction instigates with qualitative data of the annual burn victims in the UK as well as the admission rates. The overall impact of the advances in physical treatment of burns is also noted, a fact which is supported by Pavoni et al. (1) who noted that there have been significant progressions in the medical treatment of physical injury of burn victims which have culminated in the enhancement of the general mortality rate after the burn injury among the patients. The gaps in the provision of the psychosocial support in the UK to these victims in diverse medical facilities are also identified in this section. In addition, different psychosocial implications in the post-burn treatment are also highlighted. These psychosocial consequences are also outlined in the research brief by the Kronkosky Charitable Foundation (3) which cited anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) and depression as being some of the primary psychological issues which are usually faced by the burn survivors. The vulnerability markers of the detrimental psychological results of burns among the parents are also outlined, the most robust being evident in pre-morbid mental health. This vulnerability variance is also epitomized by Niţescu et. al. (577) who cited diverse researches which have pointed that majority of the burn survivors are able to extensively adjust to the post-burn period in terms of achieving a satisfactory quality of life. Nonetheless, 30% of any sample of burn survivors has been ascertained to be in constant exhibition of either moderate or acute psychological or social problems. This shows the variance in the level of vulnerability of the burn victims. Lastly, this section noted the limited level of published research on the imperative nature of parental adjustment to the burned children’s psychosocial rehabilitation, apart from the work by Kent et al. which was also outside the UK. Nonetheless, there is acknowledgement of the service establishment in the realms of psychosocial support which has seen increased focus since 2001 and the eventual publication of the NBCR report. The need to provide evidence based recommendations in regard to the need for psycho-social support to the families which are affected by burns is cemented as being the central focus underpinning this study. Method of article In regard to the sample and procedure, the sample size and characteristics in this study can be perceived to be a representative of the larger burn victims among children. In addition, based on the fact that this study focused on both the inpatient and outpatient areas, it was bound to achieve a comprehensive participation of the burn victims as well as meeting the quotas in the sampling techniques in terms of age and gender among others. On the other hand, the criteria for the respondents to be included in this study is viable since it is aimed at retrieving information which will fortify the recommendations at the end of the study from specific and well-selected informants. This is key in ensuring that the gathered evidence from the sample will be justifiable. Moreover, the greater focus on the parents of children attending outpatient clinics (56 parents) when juxtaposed 16 parents of inpatient is chief in getting information focusing on the long-term post-treatment psychosocial implication of the burns on these families. Other aspects of the methods includes the acquisition of ethical approval from the involved Healthcare Trusts as well as getting consent from the respondents which are fundamental in obtaining viable information which is founded on ethical practices as evident in this study. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that there was a necessity to include a considerable number of healthcare practitioners like nurses in the study sample based on the rationale that they are in constant interaction with thee burn victims, mostly at a very personal level. Thus, they are bound to be endowed with integral information in regard to the psychosocial needs of their patients as well as the most ideal approach in this process which would have been paramount in strengthening the recommendations of this study. In regard to the materials, the use of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Mini Marker Personality Inventory and McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) was bound to produce viable quantitative data. In addition, the general use of the semi-structured interviews which entailed questions on the hospital experience, views on the necessary support and the problems and implications of the burns conducted with the parents during the home visits was bound to produce some sought of qualitative information based on aspects like observations which would be fundamental in supporting the quantitative data. Results of article In regard to the common causes of burn injury among the children in the inpatient sample, it was evident that scalds from hot drink/ liquid was the most predominant cause (88%) followed by hot bath (6%) and lastly contact with hot cooking oil (6%). This is roughly similar to the outpatient cases. The prominence of scalds from hot fluid as a cause of burn injury is also revealed by Justin-Temu et. al (38) who cited that thermal scalding (by hot fluids) is the most common cause of burn injury among children. In addition, Read More