Tobacco and Alcohol Tax Increments for Medical Welfare - Literature review Example

Tobacco and Alcohol Tax Increments for Medical Welfare Introduction Research indicates tobacco and alcohol usage as a main cause to preventable deaths in the modern society. Various reviews from the professor and other students, assert evidence that the society engages in the production and use of the substances. They aim to create revenues towards economic development. They assert that products from the two categories contribute to a greater GDP measure compared to other manufactured products. The ill resolution for the massive production of the two commodities in order to fuel economic growth poses unbearable consequences to the users (Brisbin, 2008). Arguably, the massive production calls for massive users, thus; the population of cigarette and alcohol users is on the increase despite the awareness created by different human welfare groups to ensure that the practices cease with time. Part 1: Revision of a problem that exists The professor and fellow students assert that economic growth prevails at the expense of the users who face different incurable health problems. These health problems include liver cirrhosis for the alcohol users and lung cancer for the tobacco users. In emphasis, these are the two main causes of preventable deaths in the global society (El-Saharty & World Bank, 2013). The United States of America statistical reviews indicate that the society could reduce its mortality rates by avoiding the consumption of the two commodities. Social scientists embark on stringent measures to pursue for the implementation of rules and regulations that would lead to the increased costs for the products’ usages holding that the approach will contribute positively to the society. In the professor’s opinion, the resolution will enable the health facilities to be able to provide medical care to curb the preventable deaths since the amassed revenues will be redirected for use in the health sector. This argument would be beneficial, but only to the extent that entire society would embrace it for the benefit of the forthcoming generations. The professor indicates persistence of the problem since populations seem to match an increment in the addicts and new user populations (Brisbin, 2008). The challenges reveal future uncertainties for the drug users’ growing population as the medical facilities may lack the financial capabilities to cater for the medical needs of the ailing. Scholars reveal that the escalation of the costs of the two drug commodities may only lead to a reduction in marginal consumption since the users will not be able to purchase their unit quantities at the increased prices. Therefore, the move poses challenges as it may fail to accrue the desired revenue amounts. Further, the increment of taxes will lead to increased wealth to the national governments as the rates accrued from the addicts who may not cease, and this shall eventually translate to an increased GNP (El-Saharty & World Bank, 2013). In my own account, I view that the professor’s resolution of price increment may serve as detrimental. Mainly, the reduced marginal consumption indicates that the health facilities may not yield the desired revenue since the accrued amount will reduce in the long run. Secondly, it will be an advantageous resolution since its implementation may lead to reduced mortality rates (LaVilla & Wynn, 2010). Financial will reduce challenges as the users will draw from the tendency and shelf the costs to cater for that of the drugs. Such a resolution will affect all dependants of the users too. Arguably, the deterrence is that the increased poverty rates and financial incompetence will lead to increased incapacities in health issues. For instance, people will be unable to acquire the basic medical needs with the assertion of the tax regulations since they will lack personal financial capabilities (Brisbin, 2008). Critically, increased taxes for the commodities seem to be a failure in the long run, and it would be a wise decision of the authorities and other interest groups to engage in finding a better approach to curbing the menace. The advantages borne of the remedy of tax increment to the drug prices are overwhelming. The fact is that the society shall be able to acquire financial support from the drug users in executing treatments. These financial contributions shall emanate from the taxes paid by the users during the purchase. The different groups of social smokers and drunks shall be contributing towards the reduction of the overall medical budget that other utilities may spend towards the provision of medical services for the ailing drug users (El-Saharty & World Bank, 2013). The solution indicated by the professor and fellow students seems to be the vital discourse to engaging the drug users into realizing the costs of medication that befalls the tendency of drug abuse in the long run. Therefore, the remedy shall be served to benefit the entire society from those who recuperate from the addiction will save the finances that they would have been using for the purchase of the drugs in handling other expenses of majority needs. Up to this point, it is vital to assert thnat5 vital implementation of tax increment upon the products’ prices shall serve to increase the society’s economic and social welfare (Brisbin, 2008). Predictions are that the future generations will desist from the drug usages since they will find them too expensive to use. Secondly, they will be able to evaluate the high costs of the drugs, the health repercussions that stand in their futures, and the financial incompetence that will occur from the usages (Berry, 2005). Part 2: Solution to the problem and advantages Solution and thesis I beseech all the American society inclusive of the health advocates and potential voters to embrace increment in taxes on alcohol and tobacco (TAT). The move shall serve to the advantage of the entire society as the users will be involved in catering for their subsequent medical expenses. Similarly, the solution shall serve as a constraint to indulge in the use of these health hazardous’ commodities. Statistics implement that indulgence in the use of drugs is rising with time. The arguments are that unemployment and increased poverty rates are a main cause of the growth (El-Saharty & World Bank, 2013). The following discussion seeks to implement the vital advantages that the society would accrue from the enforcement of taxes on alcohol and tobacco products. Support Medical practitioners find curbing the health challenges posed by the consumption of the two drugs inevitably as they struggle to their level best to reduce the risk of deaths that the users suffer in the end. Such challenges would be avoided if the TAT solution would be embraced and enacted in every American state. Statistical data show that over 70,000 Americans die from cancerous diseases caused by alcohol and tobacco consumption. Further, the total mortality rate emanating from the drug usage ranges at 457,000 (Berry, 2005). It is knowledgeable that an increment in taxes will influence the users towards withdrawal as they shall find the purchase rather expensive and shall devote their spending on other necessities. It is vital to understand that the society shall be undertaking an appropriate step to achieve development and replenished social welfare through the reduction in mortality rates (Brisbin, 2008). This is because the people exposed to such preventable deaths may be undertaking performances to benefit the broader society, and their absence will cause problems before finding accurate replacements. Economic advantage The advantage of TAT regulation is profound growth. Surveys indicate that the conversion of the users’ population from the vice would subsequently lead to an increment in lifespan. Essentially, the population increment shall translate to increment in production since there would be enough and fit labor. This will be beneficial and of use in the economy. Presumably, the American society should understand that the increment in population is influential increased production in the presence and ease in innovative investments (El-Saharty & World Bank, 2013). Therefore, TAT shall be serving the American society positively as everybody engages in innovative programs to earn beneficial returns. Comparably, the society’s medical expenses will reduce gradually as the users withdraw from the drug usage due to the increased costs (Brisbin, 2008). However repulsive the approach might seem to the addicts, they will be able to undertake tasks without facing preventable health challenges. Consequently, they will register higher output thus increasing the overall returns. Social advantage Ethics and morals, seek to ensure the protection of life for worth courses. Therefore, the society finds it unworthy when lives are lost to preventable circumstances other than the act of God. Such challenges deter acquisition of the desired edge of social welfare. An implementation of taxes translates to an increment in the number of lives as the population vulnerable to preventable deaths decreases accordingly (LaVilla & Wynn, 2010). I suppose that all states view, the essence of life and the wholeness of families in the absence of unnecessary deaths a choice worth acting for rather than restraining the process of implementation and suffering the losses borne therein. The solution will upon its implementation lead to decreased poverty levels as the young population will find indulgence an expensive course thus rule out on the behavior at an early stage (Berry, 2005). Lastly, those already in the cycle of drug abuse will withdraw gradually, and they will spend the costs on necessities for the benefit of the society. Ethical, moral and environmental advantages Precisely, the solution will curb the menace witnessed by the society from the ill consumption of alcohol and tobacco products. While critics will seek to deter the effective implementation of the law, citing on the economic consequences that it may pose to the producers, it is essential to acknowledge that the solution is in the best of ethics and social morality. It is sound to state that the consumption of the products impairs ones justices thus; the users are incapable of making the right decisions when executing the obligations of public importance. For instance, a persons driver may lack the capacity to justify the road conditions, and may eventually cause an accident, destruction of properties, and loss of lives (Brisbin, 2008). Therefore, TAT shall serve as a key to restructuring ethics and morality in the American society since its implementation will lead to reduced consumption of the drugs. I beseech voters to acknowledge the importance of TAT for the beneficial changes that the resolution will deliver in curbing environmental pollution caused by public consumption of the products. Conclusion Tobacco and alcohol production and consumption remain in legal despite the health challenges, and unnecessary deaths they cause. The imposition of regulations based on demographic patterns has failed and the society continues to bear the consequences posed by the products. TAT rests to be the most appropriate solution to the eradication of the menace. Presumably, the established solution may serve as deterrence to the continued use of the drug to a bigger percentage of the total population engaged in the use of tobacco and alcohol (Berry, 2005). Lastly, alcohol and tobacco consumers will be exposed to incurring the medical costs. References Berry, R. A. (2005). Labor market policies in Canada and Latin America: Challenges of the new millenium. Boston [u.a.: Kluwer Acad. Publ. Brisbin, R. A. (2008). West Virginia politics and government. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. El-Saharty, S., & World Bank. (2013). Tackling noncommunicable diseases in Bangladesh: Now is the time. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. LaVilla, J., & Wynn, D. (2010). The wine, beer, & spirits handbook: A guide to styles and service. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Read More