Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Healthcare System Against the Country Brazil - Term Paper Example

 Comparative Analysis of the US Healthcare system against the Country Brazil Outline: 1.0 Introduction- Current status of healthcare system in the United States, Its advantages and disadvantages, similarities and differences with the healthcare system in Brazil. Population and healthcare in these countries. A comparative study between the healthcare systems in the United States and Brazil, Conclusion. 2.0 Body Passage-1: Discusses the healthcare system in the US- Modern healthcare interventions and facilities, high amount of healthcare expenditure, poor involvement of public sector in healthcare system, increasing middle class people and healthcare programs. 3.0 Body Passage-2: Discusses the healthcare system in Brazil- involvement of public sector in healthcare systems, communal safety healthcare network, economic barriers and increasing healthcare needs. Body Passages-3 and 4: It contains a compare the systems between both countries. Both public and private involvement in healthcare system in American and Brazil, difference in health care expenditure in the United States and Brazil, population and healthcare programs and the problems in healthcare systems in US and Brazil. 4.0 Conclusion: the essay ends with a concussion which comments that even though American healthcare system has its own advantages, it would face some practical barriers such as public involvement, insurance problems and communal safety network model which practiced in Brazilian healthcare system. Advantages and disadvantages in healthcare system in the United States, high status of healthcare expenditure, healthcare management and organization in Brazilian healthcare system. Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Healthcare system against the Country BRAZIL Introduction: Contemporary healthcare market in the United States shows signs of escalating opportunity for sturdy and stable development. The continent’s rising middle-class population requires quality healthcare, but still noticeable dissimilarities exist in this area. Increasing costs of healthcare programs and interventions create barriers to middle-class people’s utilization of the healthcare system. If one studies about the healthcare systems in the US against the healthcare systems in Brazil, one can easily comprehend both advantages and disadvantages of US healthcare system. Because of the malfunctioning of medical equipments, scarcity of doctors, chronic complaints in the rural areas has remained a major concern due to absence of infrastructure facilities in Brazil. Healthcare system in Brazil had shown the signs of dilemma until 1970s. Current healthcare system in Brazil has achieved numerous growths in providing healthcare services in to the nuke and corners of the country. However, absence of proper monitoring and measuring of quality became a serious problem in current healthcare system in the United States. The involvement of both public and private sectors in healthcare system is different in both United States and Brazil. An overview of Healthcare system in the United State: Freely available medical technology and best treatment facilities help the US Healthcare system to stand firm in the status of the best healthcare system in the world. The government of the United States spends a substantial percentage of GDP for healthcare management and healthcare organization. The government of the United States further has been assembling all its efforts to control their increasing healthcare bills. Two trends are mainly understandable in the present system. One of the significant and essential is the devolution of healthcare administration and the other one is the on the rising membership of private division. A lot of those states have been bringing in obligatory common advices and restrict drug prices. Previous researches and studies have endorsed the fact that more than 42 million people in the United States live without proper health insurance and other healthcare practices because of its increasing costs and many other practical problems. Changing life style, difference in mortality rate, status of various infectious diseases, status of old age health problems and demands for quality healthcare services in American society have paved the way for polarization in American health care system in the recent years. A comparative study between the healthcare system in the United Sate and Brazil permits the reader to analyze the growth of healthcare system in both nations in recent years. Healthcare system in Country Brazil: Population and health: Successive implementation of the Organic Health Law of 1990 in Brazil universalized admittance to medical care, integrated the public healthcare system and with the support of Ministry of Health and the National Institute for Medical Assistance and Social Security, decentralized the organization of healthcare management from the federal government to the state. As a result of the improvisation comprehensive and free healthcare services are allowed for each individual. Approximately 200 million people in Brazil have been actively involved various healthcare programs and the refurbished healthcare system ensure healthcare service for the poorer who were deprived of basic care. Federal, State, and Municipalities encourage various health care programs such as Family Health Programs, Preventions programs, treatments for sick and injured and the tackling of infectious diseases. Dr Hugo Coelho Barbosa Tomassini remarks; “Although we are a developing country, our people are at risk from [noncommunicable conditions such as] cancer and trauma resulting from violence and accidents, as well as from infectious diseases such as dengue, Chagas, schistosomiasis.” (Flawed but fair: Brazils’ health system reaches out to the poor, 2008, p.2). A comparative study between the healthcare programs that practiced in the United States and Brazil: In the past two decades, states in the US have made significant sociopolitical alterations and financial predicaments in the field of healthcare management and healthcare organization. These changes, in addition to ones in the epidemiology of most important reasons of morbidity and humanity, have been connected with changes in healthcare structure. The problem of quality and administrative waste in healthcare field has been an increasing crisis in the United States healthcare system. A majority of middle class people in United States are still uninsured. In the case of Brazil, a number of common people who are engaged in public healthcare program is too high and the involvement of public sector is visible in Brazilian healthcare system. Because of this effective involvement of public sector, the government can ensure the participation of common people of the nation in a variety of healthcare programs. Studies argue that Brazil is the world’s 10th prevalent marketplace for drugs and second biggest in Latin America, next to Mexico. The online article entitled Brazil Heath Care System permits the reader to think about the healthcare status of Brazil and reader can find its gradual developments. It clearly remarks that; “The Brazilian market for health care has great potential, due to the fact that 9% of the Brazilian population is currently over sixty years of age, a demographic segment that consumes significantly more health care services than other age groups.” (Brazil healthcare system, 2007, p.2). The Brazilian healthcare system, in many ways, is complicated when contrasted with the US healthcare. The US use up so much extra cash per capita on healthcare than Brazil. The Brazilian healthcare representation plans to expand its own healthcare.  Brazil has followed a defined path to improve healthcare to its deprived inhabitants, looking for as an alternative to expand a worldwide healthcare system that is regularly available to all Brazilians. Devolution of healthcare has similarly allowed for an extra personal and instantaneous center on the specific requirements of societies. A kind of marginalization is visible in the U S healthcare system in the form of uninsured middleclass people in recent years. Quality healthcare services have often centralized the high-class society. The online article entitled A Healthy Debate: Does the Brazilian Healthcare Model Offer a Guide to the U.S.? explains; “As the Brazilian Minister of Health himself noted, the U.S. currently spends about $670 billion a year on healthcare for its approximately 300 million citizens compared to a mere 50 billion reais (approximately $22 billion) a year spent in Brazil, for a nation with a population of roughly 200 million.” (Guiraldelli & Benz, 2009, para.9). The amount of healthcare expenditure in the United States is higher than the healthcare expenditure of Brazil. Previous research proves that in the year 2006, the United States dedicated 15.3% of its GDP to health-care spending including various goods and services and healthcare infrastructure. (See figure1) Analyzing the graph one can understand the high status of the United States in spending fund for healthcare programs and interventions. US gets numerous opportunities of funding for the development of healthcare coverage. In case of Brazil, sources of funding for healthcare programs are mainly based on the cancellation of its detested monetary transaction tax. Significantly, Brazil’s example illustrates that even countries with inadequate income can attain extremely motivated goals to enlarge communal health care over time.  Brazil’s present health care condition is not fully sufficient. Even though, the country has faced severe health problems and financial crisis, it has been able to ensure a structured functioning of its healthcare system. The country has the third uppermost per capita whole expenses in the area but at the same time it is one of the inferior performers in infant humanity and life hope. Not only Chile and Costa Rica are in an enhanced place, but also Paraguay and Peru have better outcome allowing for the declared variables. Besides, these nations have fewer medical doctor densities and less nurse density. Brazil has incorporated the communal safety healthcare network with the communal system. In contrast with the healthcare system in the United States, Brazil have implemented an amalgamated form of public and private reforms and that ensure quality healthcare services than the United States, even though the two countries have practiced healthcare policies separately. The online article Health Care in Brazil underlines that; “In Brazil there is a public health care system called the SUS that was created in 1988 and established by the Brazilian Constitution. It is based on the ideas of universality, comprehensiveness, and equity.” (Soman, 2009, para.1). Unlike the healthcare system in the United States, the National Healthcare system in Brazil (SUS) ensures the service of communal safety healthcare network that strictly follow the principles of universality, comprehensiveness and equity. SUS explains relevant information that each and every person in the country must have the right to use healthcare and every citizen are allowed to complete and participate health care programs, and every healthcare guiding principles aim toward the decrease of dissimilarity between persons. SUS will be a most important precedence for the Brazilian administration as the use of Brazil’s communal healthcare system turns into cover more extensive areas. SUS plays a vital role in healthcare practices in Brazil. The issue of administrative waste in healthcare services in the United States causes quality problems and corruption. Conclusion: One can go through some relevant points about the comparative study of healthcare system in U S and Brazil. Even though existing healthcare system in the United Sates provides a high quality and modern healthcare service for its people, one cannot ignore some crucial problems in healthcare programs and interventions among the increasing middle class people. The amount of healthcare expenditure in the United Sates is very high and the US government can provide effective treatments, services of efficient doctors and technical facilities for the public. In the case of Brazil, one can find that Brazilian government gives more emphasis on public sector than private in healthcare management and healthcare organizations. Absence of effective monitoring and measuring of quality creates barriers for the smooth functioning of healthcare practices in the United Sates. Comparatively, healthcare systems in Brazil have shown quality and more public involvement than in the United Sates because of the implementation of communal safety healthcare network. A communal safety healthcare network model similar to Brazil can ensure quality and efficiency in healthcare system in the United States also. Even though one cannot accept current healthcare system in Brazil as a perfect one, but its policies ensure effective and quality healthcare for public. Figure-1 Rate of healthcare expenditure in various countries: (Lack of universal health care in the US: Morally and fiscally bankrupt, 2009). Reference List Brazil healthcare system. (2007). MOITI, p.2. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from http://www.moiti.org/pdf/Brazil%20Health%20Care%20System.pdf Flawed but fair: Brazils’ health system reaches out to the poor. (2008). Bulletin of the World Health Organization, p.2. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/4/08-030408.pdf Guiraldelli, M. F., & Benz, A. (2009). A Healthy Debate: Does the Brazilian Healthcare Model Offer a Guide to the U.S.? Foreign Policy Digest. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from http://www.foreignpolicydigest.org/March-2009/Archive/a-healthy-debate-does-the-brazilian-healthcare-model-offer-a-guide-to-the-us.html Lack of universal health care in the US: Morally and fiscally bankrupt. (2009). Science Blogs. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/04/lack_of_universal_health_care.php Soman, E. (2009). Health care in Brazil. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from http://healthmad.com/healthcare-industry/health-care-in-brazil/ Read More