Vicarious Liability Module 3 ( CASE) - Essay Example

Vicarious Liability Module 3 Introduction The doctrines concerning vicarious and corporate liability represent the lawful principles based on which the individuals are sued particularly due to their any negligence activity (Anselmi, 2012). These doctrines are not a new phenomenon that can be highlighted in the case of “Norton v. Argonaut Insurance Co.” With this concern, the essay intends to discuss about the aforesaid doctrines related to this case. Discussion of Vicarious Liability and Corporate LiabilityThe term vicarious liability is viewed to remain as a sub-part of secondary obligation, under which an individual is usually considered to be liable for the violations caused by his/her subordinate (Anselmi, 2012).

For instance, it is the employers of any organization who are duly considered to be accountable for the unlawful activities performed by their respective personnel.Conversely, the term corporate liability denotes the employers or the administrative officials of a particular firm who are held liable for performing varied illegal actions rather than the individual personnel and the employees (Anselmi, 2012).Identifying the Mistakes in the Case and Indicating the Type of Liability One of the mistakes, which can be apparently identified in the case of “Norton v.

Argonaut Insurance Co.” is the inappropriate use of the medication plan. In this context, the negligence activity performed by the nurse in terms of administering the medication plan appropriately, which resulted overdose of the medicines, eventually caused death of the infant. In context to the above discussed case, it can be indicated that the notion of vicarious liability might be applied (Leagle, Inc., 2014).Steps To Prevent Such MistakesAs the administrator or the chief of nursing, I would like to follow certain steps for preventing such happening of mistake again.

In this regard, one of such steps I will desire to implement is providing effective training to the staff. This would include a program of remaining stress free within the healthcare environment. Moreover, apart from this step, I would also try to make sure that every nurse within the organization must take valuable advices of the senior officials while catering to the requirements of the patients.Safeguards Are In Place Today To Prevent Such MistakeIn ancient times, there does not lay adequate level of valuable resources in providing effective care to the patients.

Moreover, the technology was not upgraded, which eventually resulted the occurrence of such sort of mistake. However, in this present day context, the increased extent of globalization and adoption along with execution of pioneering technological advancements have lessened such kind of mistake as compared to the earlier years. It has been witnessed that the hospital authorities nowadays are adopting various initiatives in order to address as well as mitigate such mistakes with the help of adopting advanced technological procedures (Mas & Valentini, 2012).

Meaning of Pretermitting and Its Application to the CaseThe word ‘pretermitting’ means negligence or overlooked any specific object and activity (McGinnis, n.d.). After acquiring a brief idea about the meaning of ‘pretermitting’, it can be asserted that this notion is applied to the case as the infant died due to the negligence activity performed by the nurse in terms of inappropriately utilizing the medication plan. ConclusionBased on the above analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the term vicarious liability is much applicable in relation to the case of “Norton v.

Argonaut Insurance Co.” This might be owing to the reason that the negligence activity conducted by the nurse eventually caused the death of the infant, making the notion of vicarious liability applicable by a considerable extent.ReferencesAnselmi, K. K. (2012). Ethics, law, and policy. Nurses personal liability vs. employers vicarious liability. MEDSURG Nursing, 21(1), 45.Leagle, Inc. (2014). Norton v. Argonaut Insurance Company. Retrieved from http://www.leagle.com/decision/1962393144So2d249_1357 Mas, N.

, & Valentini, G. (2012). The Importance of Technology in the Consolidation of Hospital Market. In The Case Of United States. Retrieved from http://mba.americaeconomia.com/sites/mba.americaeconomia.com/files/wp-953_tcm5-79232-1.pdfMcGinnis, K. (n.d.). Focus On misclassification of workers as independent contractors in the health care industry: are you ready to be audited? Retrieved from http://www.naylornetwork.com/ahh-nwl/articles/index-v2.asp?aid=126671&issueID=22496