The Acceptable Thing about the Evaluation Meeting - Case Study Example

The Acceptable Thing about the Evaluation MeetingIntroduction This present will analyze a foregoing portion of an evaluation meeting that took place at the manager’s office. The paper will indicate acceptable things about the evaluation meeting and inappropriate things about the evaluation meeting, and then it will suggest how these inappropriate things could have been done correctly.The acceptable thing about the evaluation meeting The only acceptable thing about the evaluation meeting was that employee evaluation is a necessary tool for assessing employees’ performance and the evaluation provides a basis through which the employees are able to know their areas of weaknesses and strengths.

More importantly, Armstrong (2010) stated that evaluations are essential for the development of the employees. This is because, by highlighting on the weaknesses of employees, they will initiate actions that will make them improve on these areas of weaknesses.The inappropriate things about the evaluation meeting The first inappropriate thing about the evaluation meeting was that, it was conducted before the employee had an opportunity to evaluate himself personally, and according to Sandler and Keefe (2003), this act denied the employee an opportunity to reflect upon himself and become accountable for his own actions.

In this regard, the manager should have conducted the evaluation meeting after the employee had the opportunity to evaluate himself and identify his own areas strengths and weaknesses. The second inappropriate thing about the evaluation meeting is that it was conducted six weeks after the actual deadline when the company is supposed to conduct evaluation of the employees. In this regard, it is suggested that the evaluation should have been carried out during the actual dates when the exercise is usually scheduled to take place.

Thirdly, the employee was not prepared for the meeting and therefore, he was unable to come up with defenses or justifications on the criticisms that were leveled against him. In this regard, it is suggested that the manager should have given the employee enough time to prepare before conducting the evaluation.Summary From the passage, it is clear that the employee was ambushed with the evaluation, thereby setting a bad tone for the meeting that did not even involve dialogue between the two parties or the exchange of ideas and opinions.

ReferencesArmstrong, S. (2010). The Essential Performance Review Handbook: A Quick and Handy Resource for Any Manager or HR Professional. New York: Career PressSandler, C. and Keefe, J. (2003). Performance Appraisal Phrase Book: The Best Words, Phrases, and Techniques for Performance Reviews. New York: Adams Media Publishers